Cargando…

Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1

OBJECTIVE: We identified a poor clinical response to treatment of cholera with a single 1 g dose of ciprofloxacin, a standard treatment for cholera. METHODS: To determine reasons for the poor response and better therapeutic approaches we examined the minimal inhibitor concentration (MIC, n = 275) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Wasif Ali, Saha, Debasish, Ahmed, Sabeena, Salam, Mohammed Abdus, Bennish, Michael Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134921
_version_ 1782385709887258624
author Khan, Wasif Ali
Saha, Debasish
Ahmed, Sabeena
Salam, Mohammed Abdus
Bennish, Michael Louis
author_facet Khan, Wasif Ali
Saha, Debasish
Ahmed, Sabeena
Salam, Mohammed Abdus
Bennish, Michael Louis
author_sort Khan, Wasif Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We identified a poor clinical response to treatment of cholera with a single 1 g dose of ciprofloxacin, a standard treatment for cholera. METHODS: To determine reasons for the poor response and better therapeutic approaches we examined the minimal inhibitor concentration (MIC, n = 275) and disc-diffusion zone sizes (n = 205) for ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid of V. cholerae O1 strains isolated in Bangladesh from 1994 to 2012, and reexamined data from 161patients infected with Vibrio cholerae O1 recruited in four clinical trials who received single- or multiple-dose ciprofloxacin for treatment of cholera and compared their clinical response to the V. cholerae O1 susceptibility. RESULTS: Although all 275 isolates of V. cholerae O1 remained susceptible to ciprofloxacin using standard MIC and disc-diffusion thresholds, the MIC(90) to ciprofloxacin increased from 0.010 in 1994 to 0.475 μgm/ml in 2012. Isolates became frankly resistant to nalidixic with the MIC(90) increasing from 21 μgm/ml in 1994 to >256 μgm/ml and 166 of 205 isolates from 1994 to 2005 being frankly resistant using disc-diffusion testing. Isolates resistant to nalidixic acid by disc-diffusion testing had a median ciprofloxacin MIC of 0.190 μgm/ml (10(th)-90(th) centiles 0.022 to 0.380); nalidixic acid-susceptible isolates had a median ciprofloxacin MIC of 0.002 (0.002 to 0.012).The rate of clinical success with single-dose ciprofloxacin treatment for nalidixic acid-susceptible strains was 94% (61 of 65 patients) and bacteriologic success 97% (63/65) compared to 18% (12/67) and 8% (5/67) respectively with nalidixic acid-resistant strains (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Multiple-dose treatment with ciprofloxacin had 86% and 100% clinical and bacteriologic success rates respectively in patients infected with nalidixic acid-susceptible strains of V. cholerae O1 compared to clinical success 67% and bacteriologic success 60% with nalidixic acid-resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose ciprofloxacin is not effective for treating cholera caused by V. cholerae O1 with diminished susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, and nalidixic acid disc-diffusion testing effectively screens for such isolates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4536225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45362252015-08-20 Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1 Khan, Wasif Ali Saha, Debasish Ahmed, Sabeena Salam, Mohammed Abdus Bennish, Michael Louis PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: We identified a poor clinical response to treatment of cholera with a single 1 g dose of ciprofloxacin, a standard treatment for cholera. METHODS: To determine reasons for the poor response and better therapeutic approaches we examined the minimal inhibitor concentration (MIC, n = 275) and disc-diffusion zone sizes (n = 205) for ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid of V. cholerae O1 strains isolated in Bangladesh from 1994 to 2012, and reexamined data from 161patients infected with Vibrio cholerae O1 recruited in four clinical trials who received single- or multiple-dose ciprofloxacin for treatment of cholera and compared their clinical response to the V. cholerae O1 susceptibility. RESULTS: Although all 275 isolates of V. cholerae O1 remained susceptible to ciprofloxacin using standard MIC and disc-diffusion thresholds, the MIC(90) to ciprofloxacin increased from 0.010 in 1994 to 0.475 μgm/ml in 2012. Isolates became frankly resistant to nalidixic with the MIC(90) increasing from 21 μgm/ml in 1994 to >256 μgm/ml and 166 of 205 isolates from 1994 to 2005 being frankly resistant using disc-diffusion testing. Isolates resistant to nalidixic acid by disc-diffusion testing had a median ciprofloxacin MIC of 0.190 μgm/ml (10(th)-90(th) centiles 0.022 to 0.380); nalidixic acid-susceptible isolates had a median ciprofloxacin MIC of 0.002 (0.002 to 0.012).The rate of clinical success with single-dose ciprofloxacin treatment for nalidixic acid-susceptible strains was 94% (61 of 65 patients) and bacteriologic success 97% (63/65) compared to 18% (12/67) and 8% (5/67) respectively with nalidixic acid-resistant strains (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Multiple-dose treatment with ciprofloxacin had 86% and 100% clinical and bacteriologic success rates respectively in patients infected with nalidixic acid-susceptible strains of V. cholerae O1 compared to clinical success 67% and bacteriologic success 60% with nalidixic acid-resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose ciprofloxacin is not effective for treating cholera caused by V. cholerae O1 with diminished susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, and nalidixic acid disc-diffusion testing effectively screens for such isolates. Public Library of Science 2015-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4536225/ /pubmed/26271050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134921 Text en © 2015 Khan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khan, Wasif Ali
Saha, Debasish
Ahmed, Sabeena
Salam, Mohammed Abdus
Bennish, Michael Louis
Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1
title Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1
title_full Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1
title_fullStr Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1
title_short Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Cholera Associated with Diminished Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin to Vibrio cholerae O1
title_sort efficacy of ciprofloxacin for treatment of cholera associated with diminished susceptibility to ciprofloxacin to vibrio cholerae o1
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134921
work_keys_str_mv AT khanwasifali efficacyofciprofloxacinfortreatmentofcholeraassociatedwithdiminishedsusceptibilitytociprofloxacintovibriocholeraeo1
AT sahadebasish efficacyofciprofloxacinfortreatmentofcholeraassociatedwithdiminishedsusceptibilitytociprofloxacintovibriocholeraeo1
AT ahmedsabeena efficacyofciprofloxacinfortreatmentofcholeraassociatedwithdiminishedsusceptibilitytociprofloxacintovibriocholeraeo1
AT salammohammedabdus efficacyofciprofloxacinfortreatmentofcholeraassociatedwithdiminishedsusceptibilitytociprofloxacintovibriocholeraeo1
AT bennishmichaellouis efficacyofciprofloxacinfortreatmentofcholeraassociatedwithdiminishedsusceptibilitytociprofloxacintovibriocholeraeo1