Cargando…

Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations

INTRODUCTION: Microvascular changes in the skin due to pharmacological and physiological provocations can be used as a marker for vascular function. While laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used extensively for measurement of skin microvascular responses, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iredahl, Fredrik, Löfberg, Andreas, Sjöberg, Folke, Farnebo, Simon, Tesselaar, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26270037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133760
_version_ 1782385711013429248
author Iredahl, Fredrik
Löfberg, Andreas
Sjöberg, Folke
Farnebo, Simon
Tesselaar, Erik
author_facet Iredahl, Fredrik
Löfberg, Andreas
Sjöberg, Folke
Farnebo, Simon
Tesselaar, Erik
author_sort Iredahl, Fredrik
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Microvascular changes in the skin due to pharmacological and physiological provocations can be used as a marker for vascular function. While laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used extensively for measurement of skin microvascular responses, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) and Tissue Viability Imaging (TiVi) are novel imaging techniques. TiVi measures red blood cell concentration, while LDF and LSCI measure perfusion. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare responses to provocations in the skin using these different techniques. METHOD: Changes in skin microcirculation were measured in healthy subjects during (1) iontophoresis of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and noradrenaline (NA), (2) local heating and (3) post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) using LDF, LSCI and TiVi. RESULTS: Iontophoresis of SNP increased perfusion (LSCI: baseline 40.9±6.2 PU; 10-min 100±25 PU; p<0.001) and RBC concentration (TiVi: baseline 119±18; 10-min 150±41 AU; p = 0.011). No change in perfusion (LSCI) was observed after iontophoresis of NA (baseline 38.0±4.4 PU; 10-min 38.9±5.0 PU; p = 0.64), while RBC concentration decreased (TiVi: baseline 59.6±11.8 AU; 10-min 54.4±13.3 AU; p = 0.021). Local heating increased perfusion (LDF: baseline 8.8±3.6 PU; max 112±55 PU; p<0.001, LSCI: baseline 50.8±8.0 PU; max 151±22 PU; p<0.001) and RBC concentration (TiVi: baseline 49.2±32.9 AU; max 99.3±28.3 AU; p<0.001). After 5 minutes of forearm occlusion with prior exsanguination, a decrease was seen in perfusion (LDF: p = 0.027; LSCI: p<0.001) and in RBC concentration (p = 0.045). Only LSCI showed a significant decrease in perfusion after 5 minutes of occlusion without prior exsanguination (p<0.001). Coefficients of variation were lower for LSCI and TiVi compared to LDF for most responses. CONCLUSION: LSCI is more sensitive than TiVi for measuring microvascular changes during SNP-induced vasodilatation and forearm occlusion. TiVi is more sensitive to noradrenaline-induced vasoconstriction. LSCI and TiVi show lower inter-subject variability than LDF. These findings are important to consider when choosing measurement techniques for studying skin microvascular responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4536230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45362302015-08-20 Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations Iredahl, Fredrik Löfberg, Andreas Sjöberg, Folke Farnebo, Simon Tesselaar, Erik PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Microvascular changes in the skin due to pharmacological and physiological provocations can be used as a marker for vascular function. While laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used extensively for measurement of skin microvascular responses, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) and Tissue Viability Imaging (TiVi) are novel imaging techniques. TiVi measures red blood cell concentration, while LDF and LSCI measure perfusion. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare responses to provocations in the skin using these different techniques. METHOD: Changes in skin microcirculation were measured in healthy subjects during (1) iontophoresis of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and noradrenaline (NA), (2) local heating and (3) post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) using LDF, LSCI and TiVi. RESULTS: Iontophoresis of SNP increased perfusion (LSCI: baseline 40.9±6.2 PU; 10-min 100±25 PU; p<0.001) and RBC concentration (TiVi: baseline 119±18; 10-min 150±41 AU; p = 0.011). No change in perfusion (LSCI) was observed after iontophoresis of NA (baseline 38.0±4.4 PU; 10-min 38.9±5.0 PU; p = 0.64), while RBC concentration decreased (TiVi: baseline 59.6±11.8 AU; 10-min 54.4±13.3 AU; p = 0.021). Local heating increased perfusion (LDF: baseline 8.8±3.6 PU; max 112±55 PU; p<0.001, LSCI: baseline 50.8±8.0 PU; max 151±22 PU; p<0.001) and RBC concentration (TiVi: baseline 49.2±32.9 AU; max 99.3±28.3 AU; p<0.001). After 5 minutes of forearm occlusion with prior exsanguination, a decrease was seen in perfusion (LDF: p = 0.027; LSCI: p<0.001) and in RBC concentration (p = 0.045). Only LSCI showed a significant decrease in perfusion after 5 minutes of occlusion without prior exsanguination (p<0.001). Coefficients of variation were lower for LSCI and TiVi compared to LDF for most responses. CONCLUSION: LSCI is more sensitive than TiVi for measuring microvascular changes during SNP-induced vasodilatation and forearm occlusion. TiVi is more sensitive to noradrenaline-induced vasoconstriction. LSCI and TiVi show lower inter-subject variability than LDF. These findings are important to consider when choosing measurement techniques for studying skin microvascular responses. Public Library of Science 2015-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4536230/ /pubmed/26270037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133760 Text en © 2015 Iredahl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iredahl, Fredrik
Löfberg, Andreas
Sjöberg, Folke
Farnebo, Simon
Tesselaar, Erik
Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations
title Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations
title_full Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations
title_short Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations
title_sort non-invasive measurement of skin microvascular response during pharmacological and physiological provocations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26270037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133760
work_keys_str_mv AT iredahlfredrik noninvasivemeasurementofskinmicrovascularresponseduringpharmacologicalandphysiologicalprovocations
AT lofbergandreas noninvasivemeasurementofskinmicrovascularresponseduringpharmacologicalandphysiologicalprovocations
AT sjobergfolke noninvasivemeasurementofskinmicrovascularresponseduringpharmacologicalandphysiologicalprovocations
AT farnebosimon noninvasivemeasurementofskinmicrovascularresponseduringpharmacologicalandphysiologicalprovocations
AT tesselaarerik noninvasivemeasurementofskinmicrovascularresponseduringpharmacologicalandphysiologicalprovocations