Cargando…

Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether advanced practice providers could learn to collect objective functional assessment data accurately and efficiently with commercially available devices that measure kinematics and kinetics (Nintendo Wii Balance Board [WBB] and Level Belt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Tiffany L., Ames, Tyler D., Le, Khoi M., Wee, Corinne, Phieffer, Laura S., Quatman, Carmen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458515577196
_version_ 1782385750922231808
author Wang, Tiffany L.
Ames, Tyler D.
Le, Khoi M.
Wee, Corinne
Phieffer, Laura S.
Quatman, Carmen E.
author_facet Wang, Tiffany L.
Ames, Tyler D.
Le, Khoi M.
Wee, Corinne
Phieffer, Laura S.
Quatman, Carmen E.
author_sort Wang, Tiffany L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether advanced practice providers could learn to collect objective functional assessment data accurately and efficiently with commercially available devices that measure kinematics and kinetics (Nintendo Wii Balance Board [WBB] and Level Belt [LB]) to aid in the assessment of fall risk and outcomes after fragility fractures. METHODS: Nine advanced practice providers participated in a 1-hour clinical assessment tools (CATs) training session on equipment use, providing standardized instructions, and practice of the testing procedures. Afterward, they participated in a skills demonstration evaluation and completed a postsession survey. RESULTS: Participants successfully achieved a mean of 18.22 (standard deviation 1.56) of 20 performance measures. Of the incomplete or omitted tasks, the majority (10 of 16) occurred within the first of 3 CATs activities. Postsession survey results revealed that 9 of 9 participants reported that the 1 hour provided for training on the CATs was sufficient. All participants reported that after the training, they felt confident they could reliably carry out the tasks to test patients on both the WBB and the LB. The majority of participants reported that they believed that the WBB (7 of 9) and LB (8 out of 9) would be good assets to clinics in assessing patient functionality after fragility fractures. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that advanced practice providers can confidently learn and effectively test patients with the WBB and LB within 1 hour of training. In the future, adoption of CATs in the clinical setting may allow for objective, easy-to-use, portable, noninvasive, and relatively inexpensive measures to assess functional outcomes in patients with fragility fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4536498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45364982016-09-01 Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures Wang, Tiffany L. Ames, Tyler D. Le, Khoi M. Wee, Corinne Phieffer, Laura S. Quatman, Carmen E. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether advanced practice providers could learn to collect objective functional assessment data accurately and efficiently with commercially available devices that measure kinematics and kinetics (Nintendo Wii Balance Board [WBB] and Level Belt [LB]) to aid in the assessment of fall risk and outcomes after fragility fractures. METHODS: Nine advanced practice providers participated in a 1-hour clinical assessment tools (CATs) training session on equipment use, providing standardized instructions, and practice of the testing procedures. Afterward, they participated in a skills demonstration evaluation and completed a postsession survey. RESULTS: Participants successfully achieved a mean of 18.22 (standard deviation 1.56) of 20 performance measures. Of the incomplete or omitted tasks, the majority (10 of 16) occurred within the first of 3 CATs activities. Postsession survey results revealed that 9 of 9 participants reported that the 1 hour provided for training on the CATs was sufficient. All participants reported that after the training, they felt confident they could reliably carry out the tasks to test patients on both the WBB and the LB. The majority of participants reported that they believed that the WBB (7 of 9) and LB (8 out of 9) would be good assets to clinics in assessing patient functionality after fragility fractures. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that advanced practice providers can confidently learn and effectively test patients with the WBB and LB within 1 hour of training. In the future, adoption of CATs in the clinical setting may allow for objective, easy-to-use, portable, noninvasive, and relatively inexpensive measures to assess functional outcomes in patients with fragility fracture. SAGE Publications 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4536498/ /pubmed/26328225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458515577196 Text en © The Author(s) 2015
spellingShingle Articles
Wang, Tiffany L.
Ames, Tyler D.
Le, Khoi M.
Wee, Corinne
Phieffer, Laura S.
Quatman, Carmen E.
Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures
title Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures
title_full Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures
title_fullStr Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures
title_short Training Advanced Practice Providers to Collect Functional Outcomes After Fragility Fractures
title_sort training advanced practice providers to collect functional outcomes after fragility fractures
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458515577196
work_keys_str_mv AT wangtiffanyl trainingadvancedpracticeproviderstocollectfunctionaloutcomesafterfragilityfractures
AT amestylerd trainingadvancedpracticeproviderstocollectfunctionaloutcomesafterfragilityfractures
AT lekhoim trainingadvancedpracticeproviderstocollectfunctionaloutcomesafterfragilityfractures
AT weecorinne trainingadvancedpracticeproviderstocollectfunctionaloutcomesafterfragilityfractures
AT phiefferlauras trainingadvancedpracticeproviderstocollectfunctionaloutcomesafterfragilityfractures
AT quatmancarmene trainingadvancedpracticeproviderstocollectfunctionaloutcomesafterfragilityfractures