Cargando…

Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits

BACKGROUND: Elevated follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is associated with poor vaginal oocyte retrieval (VOR) outcomes and cycle cancellations but intercycle variability in basal FSH reportedly does not predict ovarian response. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of basal FSH (n = 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gingold, Julian A., Lee, Joseph A., Whitehouse, Michael C., Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge, Sandler, Benjamin, Grunfeld, Lawrence, Mukherjee, Tanmoy, Copperman, Alan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0078-0
_version_ 1782385762797355008
author Gingold, Julian A.
Lee, Joseph A.
Whitehouse, Michael C.
Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge
Sandler, Benjamin
Grunfeld, Lawrence
Mukherjee, Tanmoy
Copperman, Alan B.
author_facet Gingold, Julian A.
Lee, Joseph A.
Whitehouse, Michael C.
Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge
Sandler, Benjamin
Grunfeld, Lawrence
Mukherjee, Tanmoy
Copperman, Alan B.
author_sort Gingold, Julian A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Elevated follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is associated with poor vaginal oocyte retrieval (VOR) outcomes and cycle cancellations but intercycle variability in basal FSH reportedly does not predict ovarian response. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of basal FSH (n = 15573 cycles) in couples (n = 9132) who initiated IVF cycle(s) with basal estradiol (E(2)) <100 pg/mL between 2002 and 2014 to reevaluate this hypothesis. The most recent (current) FSH, maximum FSH (Max FSH) and prior cycle maximum basal FSH (PMax FSH) were computed for each cycle. Metaphase II (MII) oocyte counts were modeled by age, stimulation type, prior peak E(2) level, prior MII count, Max FSH, PMax FSH and current FSH. Antral follicle counts, pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were modeled as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Max FSH level distinguished completed cycles from cancelled cycles better than PMax FSH or current FSH (AUC of 0.72, 0.71 and 0.61, respectively, p < 0.001). Fewer MIIs were retrieved (5.7 ± 3.8) in cycles with Max FSH >13 mIU/mL (n = 1475) than those with ≤13 mIU/mL (n = 11978) (11.6 ± 7.1) (p < 0.001). Max FSH was a better predictor of MII count than PMax FSH or current FSH after controlling for age, stimulation type, prior peak E(2) level and prior MII count. Additional MIIs were retrieved on average in cycles with PMax FSH >13 mIU/mL (n = 1930) whose current FSH was ≤13 mIU/ml rather than >13 mIU/ml (p < 0.01) after controlling for age, cycle number and stimulation type. However, no improvement in pregnancy or live birth rate was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Max FSH is the best FSH-based predictor of ovarian reserve. Retrieval benefits from waiting for a "better" month appear to exist but are limited. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0078-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4536597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45365972015-08-15 Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits Gingold, Julian A. Lee, Joseph A. Whitehouse, Michael C. Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge Sandler, Benjamin Grunfeld, Lawrence Mukherjee, Tanmoy Copperman, Alan B. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Elevated follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is associated with poor vaginal oocyte retrieval (VOR) outcomes and cycle cancellations but intercycle variability in basal FSH reportedly does not predict ovarian response. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of basal FSH (n = 15573 cycles) in couples (n = 9132) who initiated IVF cycle(s) with basal estradiol (E(2)) <100 pg/mL between 2002 and 2014 to reevaluate this hypothesis. The most recent (current) FSH, maximum FSH (Max FSH) and prior cycle maximum basal FSH (PMax FSH) were computed for each cycle. Metaphase II (MII) oocyte counts were modeled by age, stimulation type, prior peak E(2) level, prior MII count, Max FSH, PMax FSH and current FSH. Antral follicle counts, pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were modeled as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Max FSH level distinguished completed cycles from cancelled cycles better than PMax FSH or current FSH (AUC of 0.72, 0.71 and 0.61, respectively, p < 0.001). Fewer MIIs were retrieved (5.7 ± 3.8) in cycles with Max FSH >13 mIU/mL (n = 1475) than those with ≤13 mIU/mL (n = 11978) (11.6 ± 7.1) (p < 0.001). Max FSH was a better predictor of MII count than PMax FSH or current FSH after controlling for age, stimulation type, prior peak E(2) level and prior MII count. Additional MIIs were retrieved on average in cycles with PMax FSH >13 mIU/mL (n = 1930) whose current FSH was ≤13 mIU/ml rather than >13 mIU/ml (p < 0.01) after controlling for age, cycle number and stimulation type. However, no improvement in pregnancy or live birth rate was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Max FSH is the best FSH-based predictor of ovarian reserve. Retrieval benefits from waiting for a "better" month appear to exist but are limited. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0078-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4536597/ /pubmed/26272081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0078-0 Text en © Gingold et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gingold, Julian A.
Lee, Joseph A.
Whitehouse, Michael C.
Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge
Sandler, Benjamin
Grunfeld, Lawrence
Mukherjee, Tanmoy
Copperman, Alan B.
Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits
title Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits
title_full Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits
title_fullStr Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits
title_full_unstemmed Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits
title_short Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits
title_sort maximum basal fsh predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal fsh levels: waiting for a “better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0078-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gingoldjuliana maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits
AT leejosepha maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits
AT whitehousemichaelc maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits
AT rodriguezpuratajorge maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits
AT sandlerbenjamin maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits
AT grunfeldlawrence maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits
AT mukherjeetanmoy maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits
AT coppermanalanb maximumbasalfshpredictsreproductiveoutcomebetterthancyclespecificbasalfshlevelswaitingforabettermonthconveyslimitedretrievalbenefits