Cargando…

Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to assess the effects of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation or gelatin sponge particle (GSP) embolization on patients with giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors. METHODS: A total of 24 cases with giant sacral neurogenic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Xiaojun, Wei, Sun, Yang, Chunxi, Hua, Yingqi, Shen, Jiakang, Cai, Zhengdong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0662-y
_version_ 1782385788104736768
author Ma, Xiaojun
Wei, Sun
Yang, Chunxi
Hua, Yingqi
Shen, Jiakang
Cai, Zhengdong
author_facet Ma, Xiaojun
Wei, Sun
Yang, Chunxi
Hua, Yingqi
Shen, Jiakang
Cai, Zhengdong
author_sort Ma, Xiaojun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to assess the effects of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation or gelatin sponge particle (GSP) embolization on patients with giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors. METHODS: A total of 24 cases with giant sacral neurogenic tumor were performed in a retrospective study between 2000 and 2012. Nineteen cases received surgical resection, and five cases received non-surgical treatment. In surgical group, patients with type III sacral tumor had received a combined anterior-posterior approach and patients with type IV were treated with simple anterior approach. In non-surgical group, CT-guided (125)I seed implantation or GSP embolization was applied to occlude vessels. Besides, CT scanning or magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the size and development of tumors. RESULTS: Two of the five patients were treated three times with GSP embolization, one had received GSP embolization combined with CT-guided (125)I seed implantation, one case did not receive any treatment, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Patients in non-surgical group were followed up for 2–8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that CT-guided (125)I seed implantation or GSP embolization treatment is very useful to slow down the development of giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4536730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45367302015-08-15 Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors Ma, Xiaojun Wei, Sun Yang, Chunxi Hua, Yingqi Shen, Jiakang Cai, Zhengdong World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to assess the effects of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 ((125)I) seed implantation or gelatin sponge particle (GSP) embolization on patients with giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors. METHODS: A total of 24 cases with giant sacral neurogenic tumor were performed in a retrospective study between 2000 and 2012. Nineteen cases received surgical resection, and five cases received non-surgical treatment. In surgical group, patients with type III sacral tumor had received a combined anterior-posterior approach and patients with type IV were treated with simple anterior approach. In non-surgical group, CT-guided (125)I seed implantation or GSP embolization was applied to occlude vessels. Besides, CT scanning or magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the size and development of tumors. RESULTS: Two of the five patients were treated three times with GSP embolization, one had received GSP embolization combined with CT-guided (125)I seed implantation, one case did not receive any treatment, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Patients in non-surgical group were followed up for 2–8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that CT-guided (125)I seed implantation or GSP embolization treatment is very useful to slow down the development of giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors. BioMed Central 2015-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4536730/ /pubmed/26271355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0662-y Text en © Ma et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Xiaojun
Wei, Sun
Yang, Chunxi
Hua, Yingqi
Shen, Jiakang
Cai, Zhengdong
Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors
title Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors
title_full Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors
title_fullStr Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors
title_full_unstemmed Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors
title_short Gelfoam embolization or (125)I seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors
title_sort gelfoam embolization or (125)i seed implantation may be a more effective treatment than surgical treatment for giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0662-y
work_keys_str_mv AT maxiaojun gelfoamembolizationor125iseedimplantationmaybeamoreeffectivetreatmentthansurgicaltreatmentforgiantbenignsacralneurogenictumors
AT weisun gelfoamembolizationor125iseedimplantationmaybeamoreeffectivetreatmentthansurgicaltreatmentforgiantbenignsacralneurogenictumors
AT yangchunxi gelfoamembolizationor125iseedimplantationmaybeamoreeffectivetreatmentthansurgicaltreatmentforgiantbenignsacralneurogenictumors
AT huayingqi gelfoamembolizationor125iseedimplantationmaybeamoreeffectivetreatmentthansurgicaltreatmentforgiantbenignsacralneurogenictumors
AT shenjiakang gelfoamembolizationor125iseedimplantationmaybeamoreeffectivetreatmentthansurgicaltreatmentforgiantbenignsacralneurogenictumors
AT caizhengdong gelfoamembolizationor125iseedimplantationmaybeamoreeffectivetreatmentthansurgicaltreatmentforgiantbenignsacralneurogenictumors