Cargando…

Prediction of basal metabolic rate in overweight/obese and non-obese subjects and its relation to pulmonary function tests

BACKGROUND: Few studies investigated the association between basal metabolic rate (BMR) and indicators of pulmonary function. This study was conducted to estimate BMR in overweight/obese and non-obese healthy subjects using four commonly used predictive equations and to investigate its relation to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merghani, Tarig H, Alawad, Azza O, Ibrahim, Rihab M, Abdelmoniem, Asim M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26276559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1320-8
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Few studies investigated the association between basal metabolic rate (BMR) and indicators of pulmonary function. This study was conducted to estimate BMR in overweight/obese and non-obese healthy subjects using four commonly used predictive equations and to investigate its relation to the indicators of lung function tests (LFT). A cross sectional study was conducted in Tabuk University, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. A total of 201 students (98 males and 103 females) participated in the study. Four different values of BMR were calculated for each participant using four different predictive equations (Harris-Benedict, Mifflin, FAO/WHO/UNU and Henry-Rees). A portable All-flow spirometer (Clement Clarke International, Harlow, UK) was used for measurements of LFT. RESULTS: Significantly higher values of spirometric indicators (p < 0.05) were found in males compared to females, except for FEF75 and FEF75-85. Mean BMR values predicted with the four equations were significantly higher in the males compared to the females and among the overweight/obese compared to the non-obese subjects (p < 0.05). The relation between mean BMR values and the indicators of LFT was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mean values of LFT indicators are not related to the estimated values of BMR. A practical calculation of BMR based on direct measurement of oxygen consumption is recommended to confirm the absence of this association.