Cargando…

Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review is to study the effect of school-based interventions on smoking prevention for girls. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles published since 1992 on school-based tobacco-control interventions in controlled trials for smoking prevention among chil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Kleijn, Miriam J.J., Farmer, Melissa M., Booth, Marika, Motala, Aneesa, Smith, Alexandria, Sherman, Scott, Assendelft, Willem J.J., Shekelle, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7
_version_ 1782385794677211136
author de Kleijn, Miriam J.J.
Farmer, Melissa M.
Booth, Marika
Motala, Aneesa
Smith, Alexandria
Sherman, Scott
Assendelft, Willem J.J.
Shekelle, Paul
author_facet de Kleijn, Miriam J.J.
Farmer, Melissa M.
Booth, Marika
Motala, Aneesa
Smith, Alexandria
Sherman, Scott
Assendelft, Willem J.J.
Shekelle, Paul
author_sort de Kleijn, Miriam J.J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review is to study the effect of school-based interventions on smoking prevention for girls. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles published since 1992 on school-based tobacco-control interventions in controlled trials for smoking prevention among children. We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Databases, CINAHL, Social Science Abstracts, and PsycInfo. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and quality and extracted data. A pooled random-effects estimate was estimated of the overall relative risk. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials were included, of which 16 trials with 24,210 girls were included in the pooled analysis. The overall pooled effect was a relative risk (RR) of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.08; I(2)=75 %). One study in which a school-based intervention was combined with a mass media intervention showed more promising results compared to only school-based prevention, and four studies with girl-specific interventions, that could not be included in the pooled analysis, reported statistically significant benefits for attitudes and intentions about smoking and quit rates. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that school-based smoking prevention programs have a significant effect on preventing adolescent girls from smoking. Combining school-based programs with mass media interventions, and developing girl-specific interventions, deserve additional study as potentially more effective interventions compared to school-based-only intervention programs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42012002322 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4536766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45367662015-08-15 Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls de Kleijn, Miriam J.J. Farmer, Melissa M. Booth, Marika Motala, Aneesa Smith, Alexandria Sherman, Scott Assendelft, Willem J.J. Shekelle, Paul Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review is to study the effect of school-based interventions on smoking prevention for girls. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles published since 1992 on school-based tobacco-control interventions in controlled trials for smoking prevention among children. We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Databases, CINAHL, Social Science Abstracts, and PsycInfo. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and quality and extracted data. A pooled random-effects estimate was estimated of the overall relative risk. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials were included, of which 16 trials with 24,210 girls were included in the pooled analysis. The overall pooled effect was a relative risk (RR) of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.08; I(2)=75 %). One study in which a school-based intervention was combined with a mass media intervention showed more promising results compared to only school-based prevention, and four studies with girl-specific interventions, that could not be included in the pooled analysis, reported statistically significant benefits for attitudes and intentions about smoking and quit rates. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that school-based smoking prevention programs have a significant effect on preventing adolescent girls from smoking. Combining school-based programs with mass media interventions, and developing girl-specific interventions, deserve additional study as potentially more effective interventions compared to school-based-only intervention programs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42012002322 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4536766/ /pubmed/26272326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7 Text en © de Kleijn et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
de Kleijn, Miriam J.J.
Farmer, Melissa M.
Booth, Marika
Motala, Aneesa
Smith, Alexandria
Sherman, Scott
Assendelft, Willem J.J.
Shekelle, Paul
Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls
title Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls
title_full Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls
title_fullStr Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls
title_short Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls
title_sort systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dekleijnmiriamjj systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls
AT farmermelissam systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls
AT boothmarika systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls
AT motalaaneesa systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls
AT smithalexandria systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls
AT shermanscott systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls
AT assendelftwillemjj systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls
AT shekellepaul systematicreviewofschoolbasedinterventionstopreventsmokingforgirls