Cargando…
The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods
The Natsal-SF is a psychometrically validated measure of sexual function for use in community health surveys, derived from 17 questions reflecting three components of sexual function. Scoring requires knowledge of complex statistical modeling and, given the methodological complexities, we assessed t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.985813 |
_version_ | 1782385817829769216 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Kyle G. Mitchell, Kirstin R. Ploubidis, George B. Wellings, Kaye Datta, Jessica Johnson, Anne M. Mercer, Catherine H. |
author_facet | Jones, Kyle G. Mitchell, Kirstin R. Ploubidis, George B. Wellings, Kaye Datta, Jessica Johnson, Anne M. Mercer, Catherine H. |
author_sort | Jones, Kyle G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Natsal-SF is a psychometrically validated measure of sexual function for use in community health surveys, derived from 17 questions reflecting three components of sexual function. Scoring requires knowledge of complex statistical modeling and, given the methodological complexities, we assessed the validity of two simplified scoring methods calculated using the factor loadings produced when originally modeling the Natsal-SF items. Method 1 uses these factor loadings to three decimal places, while method 2 assigns whole numbers to each item based on the factor loadings. Scores from these simplified methods are compared to the original score using correlation coefficients, by comparing the distributions and the scores of each method in a linear regression model with key variables. We found scores from the simplified methods both correlate highly with the original score, and the distributions of scores closely match. The simplified methods result in different regression coefficients for gender and relationship context but estimate the coefficients of all other variables similarly to the original method. While the Natsal-SF should ideally be scored using latent variable modeling, the simplified methods perform well so can be used in similar contexts, increasing the utility of the Natsal-SF and enabling future studies to measure sexual function more comprehensively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4536938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45369382015-09-01 The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods Jones, Kyle G. Mitchell, Kirstin R. Ploubidis, George B. Wellings, Kaye Datta, Jessica Johnson, Anne M. Mercer, Catherine H. J Sex Res Empirical Articles The Natsal-SF is a psychometrically validated measure of sexual function for use in community health surveys, derived from 17 questions reflecting three components of sexual function. Scoring requires knowledge of complex statistical modeling and, given the methodological complexities, we assessed the validity of two simplified scoring methods calculated using the factor loadings produced when originally modeling the Natsal-SF items. Method 1 uses these factor loadings to three decimal places, while method 2 assigns whole numbers to each item based on the factor loadings. Scores from these simplified methods are compared to the original score using correlation coefficients, by comparing the distributions and the scores of each method in a linear regression model with key variables. We found scores from the simplified methods both correlate highly with the original score, and the distributions of scores closely match. The simplified methods result in different regression coefficients for gender and relationship context but estimate the coefficients of all other variables similarly to the original method. While the Natsal-SF should ideally be scored using latent variable modeling, the simplified methods perform well so can be used in similar contexts, increasing the utility of the Natsal-SF and enabling future studies to measure sexual function more comprehensively. Routledge 2015-07-24 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4536938/ /pubmed/25667952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.985813 Text en Published with license by Taylor & Francis This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Empirical Articles Jones, Kyle G. Mitchell, Kirstin R. Ploubidis, George B. Wellings, Kaye Datta, Jessica Johnson, Anne M. Mercer, Catherine H. The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods |
title | The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods |
title_full | The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods |
title_fullStr | The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods |
title_short | The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods |
title_sort | natsal-sf measure of sexual function: comparison of three scoring methods |
topic | Empirical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.985813 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joneskyleg thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT mitchellkirstinr thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT ploubidisgeorgeb thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT wellingskaye thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT dattajessica thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT johnsonannem thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT mercercatherineh thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT joneskyleg natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT mitchellkirstinr natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT ploubidisgeorgeb natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT wellingskaye natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT dattajessica natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT johnsonannem natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods AT mercercatherineh natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods |