Cargando…

The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods

The Natsal-SF is a psychometrically validated measure of sexual function for use in community health surveys, derived from 17 questions reflecting three components of sexual function. Scoring requires knowledge of complex statistical modeling and, given the methodological complexities, we assessed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Kyle G., Mitchell, Kirstin R., Ploubidis, George B., Wellings, Kaye, Datta, Jessica, Johnson, Anne M., Mercer, Catherine H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.985813
_version_ 1782385817829769216
author Jones, Kyle G.
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
Ploubidis, George B.
Wellings, Kaye
Datta, Jessica
Johnson, Anne M.
Mercer, Catherine H.
author_facet Jones, Kyle G.
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
Ploubidis, George B.
Wellings, Kaye
Datta, Jessica
Johnson, Anne M.
Mercer, Catherine H.
author_sort Jones, Kyle G.
collection PubMed
description The Natsal-SF is a psychometrically validated measure of sexual function for use in community health surveys, derived from 17 questions reflecting three components of sexual function. Scoring requires knowledge of complex statistical modeling and, given the methodological complexities, we assessed the validity of two simplified scoring methods calculated using the factor loadings produced when originally modeling the Natsal-SF items. Method 1 uses these factor loadings to three decimal places, while method 2 assigns whole numbers to each item based on the factor loadings. Scores from these simplified methods are compared to the original score using correlation coefficients, by comparing the distributions and the scores of each method in a linear regression model with key variables. We found scores from the simplified methods both correlate highly with the original score, and the distributions of scores closely match. The simplified methods result in different regression coefficients for gender and relationship context but estimate the coefficients of all other variables similarly to the original method. While the Natsal-SF should ideally be scored using latent variable modeling, the simplified methods perform well so can be used in similar contexts, increasing the utility of the Natsal-SF and enabling future studies to measure sexual function more comprehensively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4536938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45369382015-09-01 The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods Jones, Kyle G. Mitchell, Kirstin R. Ploubidis, George B. Wellings, Kaye Datta, Jessica Johnson, Anne M. Mercer, Catherine H. J Sex Res Empirical Articles The Natsal-SF is a psychometrically validated measure of sexual function for use in community health surveys, derived from 17 questions reflecting three components of sexual function. Scoring requires knowledge of complex statistical modeling and, given the methodological complexities, we assessed the validity of two simplified scoring methods calculated using the factor loadings produced when originally modeling the Natsal-SF items. Method 1 uses these factor loadings to three decimal places, while method 2 assigns whole numbers to each item based on the factor loadings. Scores from these simplified methods are compared to the original score using correlation coefficients, by comparing the distributions and the scores of each method in a linear regression model with key variables. We found scores from the simplified methods both correlate highly with the original score, and the distributions of scores closely match. The simplified methods result in different regression coefficients for gender and relationship context but estimate the coefficients of all other variables similarly to the original method. While the Natsal-SF should ideally be scored using latent variable modeling, the simplified methods perform well so can be used in similar contexts, increasing the utility of the Natsal-SF and enabling future studies to measure sexual function more comprehensively. Routledge 2015-07-24 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4536938/ /pubmed/25667952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.985813 Text en Published with license by Taylor & Francis This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Empirical Articles
Jones, Kyle G.
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
Ploubidis, George B.
Wellings, Kaye
Datta, Jessica
Johnson, Anne M.
Mercer, Catherine H.
The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods
title The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods
title_full The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods
title_fullStr The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods
title_full_unstemmed The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods
title_short The Natsal-SF Measure of Sexual Function: Comparison of Three Scoring Methods
title_sort natsal-sf measure of sexual function: comparison of three scoring methods
topic Empirical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4536938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.985813
work_keys_str_mv AT joneskyleg thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT mitchellkirstinr thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT ploubidisgeorgeb thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT wellingskaye thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT dattajessica thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT johnsonannem thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT mercercatherineh thenatsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT joneskyleg natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT mitchellkirstinr natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT ploubidisgeorgeb natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT wellingskaye natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT dattajessica natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT johnsonannem natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods
AT mercercatherineh natsalsfmeasureofsexualfunctioncomparisonofthreescoringmethods