Cargando…
Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
Humans are especially good at taking another's perspective—representing what others might be thinking or experiencing. This “mentalizing” capacity is apparent in everyday human interactions and conversations. We investigated its neural basis using magnetoencephalography. We focused on whether m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4537451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu116 |
_version_ | 1782385893631328256 |
---|---|
author | Bögels, Sara Barr, Dale J. Garrod, Simon Kessler, Klaus |
author_facet | Bögels, Sara Barr, Dale J. Garrod, Simon Kessler, Klaus |
author_sort | Bögels, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans are especially good at taking another's perspective—representing what others might be thinking or experiencing. This “mentalizing” capacity is apparent in everyday human interactions and conversations. We investigated its neural basis using magnetoencephalography. We focused on whether mentalizing was engaged spontaneously and routinely to understand an utterance's meaning or largely on-demand, to restore “common ground” when expectations were violated. Participants conversed with 1 of 2 confederate speakers and established tacit agreements about objects' names. In a subsequent “test” phase, some of these agreements were violated by either the same or a different speaker. Our analysis of the neural processing of test phase utterances revealed recruitment of neural circuits associated with language (temporal cortex), episodic memory (e.g., medial temporal lobe), and mentalizing (temporo-parietal junction and ventromedial prefrontal cortex). Theta oscillations (3–7 Hz) were modulated most prominently, and we observed phase coupling between functionally distinct neural circuits. The episodic memory and language circuits were recruited in anticipation of upcoming referring expressions, suggesting that context-sensitive predictions were spontaneously generated. In contrast, the mentalizing areas were recruited on-demand, as a means for detecting and resolving perceived pragmatic anomalies, with little evidence they were activated to make partner-specific predictions about upcoming linguistic utterances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4537451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45374512015-08-17 Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG Bögels, Sara Barr, Dale J. Garrod, Simon Kessler, Klaus Cereb Cortex Articles Humans are especially good at taking another's perspective—representing what others might be thinking or experiencing. This “mentalizing” capacity is apparent in everyday human interactions and conversations. We investigated its neural basis using magnetoencephalography. We focused on whether mentalizing was engaged spontaneously and routinely to understand an utterance's meaning or largely on-demand, to restore “common ground” when expectations were violated. Participants conversed with 1 of 2 confederate speakers and established tacit agreements about objects' names. In a subsequent “test” phase, some of these agreements were violated by either the same or a different speaker. Our analysis of the neural processing of test phase utterances revealed recruitment of neural circuits associated with language (temporal cortex), episodic memory (e.g., medial temporal lobe), and mentalizing (temporo-parietal junction and ventromedial prefrontal cortex). Theta oscillations (3–7 Hz) were modulated most prominently, and we observed phase coupling between functionally distinct neural circuits. The episodic memory and language circuits were recruited in anticipation of upcoming referring expressions, suggesting that context-sensitive predictions were spontaneously generated. In contrast, the mentalizing areas were recruited on-demand, as a means for detecting and resolving perceived pragmatic anomalies, with little evidence they were activated to make partner-specific predictions about upcoming linguistic utterances. Oxford University Press 2015-09 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4537451/ /pubmed/24904076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu116 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Bögels, Sara Barr, Dale J. Garrod, Simon Kessler, Klaus Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG |
title | Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG |
title_full | Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG |
title_fullStr | Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG |
title_full_unstemmed | Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG |
title_short | Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG |
title_sort | conversational interaction in the scanner: mentalizing during language processing as revealed by meg |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4537451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bogelssara conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg AT barrdalej conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg AT garrodsimon conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg AT kesslerklaus conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg |