Cargando…

Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG

Humans are especially good at taking another's perspective—representing what others might be thinking or experiencing. This “mentalizing” capacity is apparent in everyday human interactions and conversations. We investigated its neural basis using magnetoencephalography. We focused on whether m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bögels, Sara, Barr, Dale J., Garrod, Simon, Kessler, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4537451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu116
_version_ 1782385893631328256
author Bögels, Sara
Barr, Dale J.
Garrod, Simon
Kessler, Klaus
author_facet Bögels, Sara
Barr, Dale J.
Garrod, Simon
Kessler, Klaus
author_sort Bögels, Sara
collection PubMed
description Humans are especially good at taking another's perspective—representing what others might be thinking or experiencing. This “mentalizing” capacity is apparent in everyday human interactions and conversations. We investigated its neural basis using magnetoencephalography. We focused on whether mentalizing was engaged spontaneously and routinely to understand an utterance's meaning or largely on-demand, to restore “common ground” when expectations were violated. Participants conversed with 1 of 2 confederate speakers and established tacit agreements about objects' names. In a subsequent “test” phase, some of these agreements were violated by either the same or a different speaker. Our analysis of the neural processing of test phase utterances revealed recruitment of neural circuits associated with language (temporal cortex), episodic memory (e.g., medial temporal lobe), and mentalizing (temporo-parietal junction and ventromedial prefrontal cortex). Theta oscillations (3–7 Hz) were modulated most prominently, and we observed phase coupling between functionally distinct neural circuits. The episodic memory and language circuits were recruited in anticipation of upcoming referring expressions, suggesting that context-sensitive predictions were spontaneously generated. In contrast, the mentalizing areas were recruited on-demand, as a means for detecting and resolving perceived pragmatic anomalies, with little evidence they were activated to make partner-specific predictions about upcoming linguistic utterances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4537451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45374512015-08-17 Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG Bögels, Sara Barr, Dale J. Garrod, Simon Kessler, Klaus Cereb Cortex Articles Humans are especially good at taking another's perspective—representing what others might be thinking or experiencing. This “mentalizing” capacity is apparent in everyday human interactions and conversations. We investigated its neural basis using magnetoencephalography. We focused on whether mentalizing was engaged spontaneously and routinely to understand an utterance's meaning or largely on-demand, to restore “common ground” when expectations were violated. Participants conversed with 1 of 2 confederate speakers and established tacit agreements about objects' names. In a subsequent “test” phase, some of these agreements were violated by either the same or a different speaker. Our analysis of the neural processing of test phase utterances revealed recruitment of neural circuits associated with language (temporal cortex), episodic memory (e.g., medial temporal lobe), and mentalizing (temporo-parietal junction and ventromedial prefrontal cortex). Theta oscillations (3–7 Hz) were modulated most prominently, and we observed phase coupling between functionally distinct neural circuits. The episodic memory and language circuits were recruited in anticipation of upcoming referring expressions, suggesting that context-sensitive predictions were spontaneously generated. In contrast, the mentalizing areas were recruited on-demand, as a means for detecting and resolving perceived pragmatic anomalies, with little evidence they were activated to make partner-specific predictions about upcoming linguistic utterances. Oxford University Press 2015-09 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4537451/ /pubmed/24904076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu116 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Bögels, Sara
Barr, Dale J.
Garrod, Simon
Kessler, Klaus
Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
title Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
title_full Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
title_fullStr Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
title_full_unstemmed Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
title_short Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
title_sort conversational interaction in the scanner: mentalizing during language processing as revealed by meg
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4537451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu116
work_keys_str_mv AT bogelssara conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg
AT barrdalej conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg
AT garrodsimon conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg
AT kesslerklaus conversationalinteractioninthescannermentalizingduringlanguageprocessingasrevealedbymeg