Cargando…
Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification
Objective. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of an imaging protocol combining dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in patients with suspicious breast lesions. Materials and Methods. A total of 31 breast lesions (15 malignant and 16 b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26339597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/237863 |
_version_ | 1782385992117780480 |
---|---|
author | Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Granata, Vincenza Catalano, Orlando Amato, Daniela Maria Di Bonito, Maurizio D'Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Rinaldo, Massimo Petrillo, Antonella |
author_facet | Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Granata, Vincenza Catalano, Orlando Amato, Daniela Maria Di Bonito, Maurizio D'Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Rinaldo, Massimo Petrillo, Antonella |
author_sort | Fusco, Roberta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of an imaging protocol combining dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in patients with suspicious breast lesions. Materials and Methods. A total of 31 breast lesions (15 malignant and 16 benign proved by histological examination) in 26 female patients were included in this study. For both DCE-MRI and DW-MRI model free and model based parameters were computed pixel by pixel on manually segmented ROIs. Statistical procedures included conventional linear analysis and more advanced techniques for classification of lesions in benign and malignant. Results. Our findings indicated no strong correlation between DCE-MRI and DW-MRI parameters. Results of classification analysis show that combining of DCE parameters or DW-MRI parameter, in comparison of single feature, does not yield a dramatic improvement of sensitivity and specificity of the two techniques alone. The best performance was obtained considering a full combination of all features. Moreover, the classification results combining all features are dominated by DCE-MRI features alone. Conclusion. The combination of DWI and DCE-MRI does not show a potential to dramatically increase the sensitivity and specificity of breast MRI. DCE-MRI alone gave the same performance as in combination with DW-MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4538369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45383692015-09-03 Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Granata, Vincenza Catalano, Orlando Amato, Daniela Maria Di Bonito, Maurizio D'Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Rinaldo, Massimo Petrillo, Antonella Biomed Res Int Research Article Objective. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of an imaging protocol combining dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in patients with suspicious breast lesions. Materials and Methods. A total of 31 breast lesions (15 malignant and 16 benign proved by histological examination) in 26 female patients were included in this study. For both DCE-MRI and DW-MRI model free and model based parameters were computed pixel by pixel on manually segmented ROIs. Statistical procedures included conventional linear analysis and more advanced techniques for classification of lesions in benign and malignant. Results. Our findings indicated no strong correlation between DCE-MRI and DW-MRI parameters. Results of classification analysis show that combining of DCE parameters or DW-MRI parameter, in comparison of single feature, does not yield a dramatic improvement of sensitivity and specificity of the two techniques alone. The best performance was obtained considering a full combination of all features. Moreover, the classification results combining all features are dominated by DCE-MRI features alone. Conclusion. The combination of DWI and DCE-MRI does not show a potential to dramatically increase the sensitivity and specificity of breast MRI. DCE-MRI alone gave the same performance as in combination with DW-MRI. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4538369/ /pubmed/26339597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/237863 Text en Copyright © 2015 Roberta Fusco et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Filice, Salvatore Granata, Vincenza Catalano, Orlando Amato, Daniela Maria Di Bonito, Maurizio D'Aiuto, Massimiliano Capasso, Immacolata Rinaldo, Massimo Petrillo, Antonella Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification |
title | Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification |
title_full | Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification |
title_fullStr | Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification |
title_short | Integration of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI Quantitative Parameters for Breast Lesion Classification |
title_sort | integration of dce-mri and dw-mri quantitative parameters for breast lesion classification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26339597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/237863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuscoroberta integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT sansonemario integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT filicesalvatore integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT granatavincenza integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT catalanoorlando integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT amatodanielamaria integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT dibonitomaurizio integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT daiutomassimiliano integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT capassoimmacolata integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT rinaldomassimo integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification AT petrilloantonella integrationofdcemrianddwmriquantitativeparametersforbreastlesionclassification |