Cargando…
Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26278466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13087 |
_version_ | 1782385993240805376 |
---|---|
author | Parmar, Chintan Grossmann, Patrick Bussink, Johan Lambin, Philippe Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. |
author_facet | Parmar, Chintan Grossmann, Patrick Bussink, Johan Lambin, Philippe Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. |
author_sort | Parmar, Chintan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4538374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45383742015-08-25 Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers Parmar, Chintan Grossmann, Patrick Bussink, Johan Lambin, Philippe Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. Sci Rep Article Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group 2015-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4538374/ /pubmed/26278466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13087 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Parmar, Chintan Grossmann, Patrick Bussink, Johan Lambin, Philippe Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers |
title | Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers |
title_full | Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers |
title_short | Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers |
title_sort | machine learning methods for quantitative radiomic biomarkers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26278466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parmarchintan machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers AT grossmannpatrick machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers AT bussinkjohan machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers AT lambinphilippe machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers AT aertshugojwl machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers |