Cargando…

Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers

Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parmar, Chintan, Grossmann, Patrick, Bussink, Johan, Lambin, Philippe, Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26278466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13087
_version_ 1782385993240805376
author Parmar, Chintan
Grossmann, Patrick
Bussink, Johan
Lambin, Philippe
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
author_facet Parmar, Chintan
Grossmann, Patrick
Bussink, Johan
Lambin, Philippe
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
author_sort Parmar, Chintan
collection PubMed
description Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4538374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45383742015-08-25 Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers Parmar, Chintan Grossmann, Patrick Bussink, Johan Lambin, Philippe Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. Sci Rep Article Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group 2015-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4538374/ /pubmed/26278466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13087 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Parmar, Chintan
Grossmann, Patrick
Bussink, Johan
Lambin, Philippe
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
title Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
title_full Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
title_fullStr Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
title_short Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers
title_sort machine learning methods for quantitative radiomic biomarkers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26278466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13087
work_keys_str_mv AT parmarchintan machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers
AT grossmannpatrick machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers
AT bussinkjohan machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers
AT lambinphilippe machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers
AT aertshugojwl machinelearningmethodsforquantitativeradiomicbiomarkers