Cargando…

What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?

Articular cartilage has limited regeneration capacities. One of the factors that appear to affect the in vitro cultivation of articular cartilage is mechanical stimulation. So far, no combination of parameters has been identified that offers the best results. The goal is to review the literature in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natenstedt, Jerry, Kok, Aimee C, Dankelman, Jenny, Tuijthof, Gabrielle JM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26914883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-015-0029-x
_version_ 1782386017536311296
author Natenstedt, Jerry
Kok, Aimee C
Dankelman, Jenny
Tuijthof, Gabrielle JM
author_facet Natenstedt, Jerry
Kok, Aimee C
Dankelman, Jenny
Tuijthof, Gabrielle JM
author_sort Natenstedt, Jerry
collection PubMed
description Articular cartilage has limited regeneration capacities. One of the factors that appear to affect the in vitro cultivation of articular cartilage is mechanical stimulation. So far, no combination of parameters has been identified that offers the best results. The goal is to review the literature in search of the best available set of quantitative mechanical stimuli that lead to optimal in vitro cultivation. The databases Scopus and PubMed were used to survey the literature, and strict in- and exclusion criteria were applied regarding the presence of quantitative data. The review was performed by studying the type of loading (hydrostatic compression or direct compression), the loading magnitude, the frequency and the loading regime (duration of the loading) in comparison to quantitative evidence of cartilage quality response (cellular, signaling and mechanical). Thirty-three studies met all criteria of which 8 studied human, 20 bovine, 2 equine, 1 ovine, 1 porcine and 1 canine cells using four different types of cultivated constructs. Six studies investigated loading magnitude within the same setup, three studies the frequency, and seven the loading regime. Nine studies presented mechanical tissue response. The studies suggest that a certain threshold exits for enhanced cartilage in vitro cultivation of explants (>20 % strain and 0.5 Hz), and that chondrocyte-seeded cultivated constructs show best results when loaded with physiological mechanical stimuli. That is a loading pressure between 5–10 MPa and a loading frequency of 1 Hz exerted at intermittent intervals for a period of a week or longer. Critical aspects remain to be answered for translation into in vivo therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4538712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45387122015-08-20 What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best? Natenstedt, Jerry Kok, Aimee C Dankelman, Jenny Tuijthof, Gabrielle JM J Exp Orthop Review Articular cartilage has limited regeneration capacities. One of the factors that appear to affect the in vitro cultivation of articular cartilage is mechanical stimulation. So far, no combination of parameters has been identified that offers the best results. The goal is to review the literature in search of the best available set of quantitative mechanical stimuli that lead to optimal in vitro cultivation. The databases Scopus and PubMed were used to survey the literature, and strict in- and exclusion criteria were applied regarding the presence of quantitative data. The review was performed by studying the type of loading (hydrostatic compression or direct compression), the loading magnitude, the frequency and the loading regime (duration of the loading) in comparison to quantitative evidence of cartilage quality response (cellular, signaling and mechanical). Thirty-three studies met all criteria of which 8 studied human, 20 bovine, 2 equine, 1 ovine, 1 porcine and 1 canine cells using four different types of cultivated constructs. Six studies investigated loading magnitude within the same setup, three studies the frequency, and seven the loading regime. Nine studies presented mechanical tissue response. The studies suggest that a certain threshold exits for enhanced cartilage in vitro cultivation of explants (>20 % strain and 0.5 Hz), and that chondrocyte-seeded cultivated constructs show best results when loaded with physiological mechanical stimuli. That is a loading pressure between 5–10 MPa and a loading frequency of 1 Hz exerted at intermittent intervals for a period of a week or longer. Critical aspects remain to be answered for translation into in vivo therapies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4538712/ /pubmed/26914883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-015-0029-x Text en © Natenstedt et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Natenstedt, Jerry
Kok, Aimee C
Dankelman, Jenny
Tuijthof, Gabrielle JM
What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?
title What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?
title_full What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?
title_fullStr What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?
title_full_unstemmed What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?
title_short What quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?
title_sort what quantitative mechanical loading stimulates in vitro cultivation best?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26914883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-015-0029-x
work_keys_str_mv AT natenstedtjerry whatquantitativemechanicalloadingstimulatesinvitrocultivationbest
AT kokaimeec whatquantitativemechanicalloadingstimulatesinvitrocultivationbest
AT dankelmanjenny whatquantitativemechanicalloadingstimulatesinvitrocultivationbest
AT tuijthofgabriellejm whatquantitativemechanicalloadingstimulatesinvitrocultivationbest