Cargando…

Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches

BACKGROUND: Image registration algorithms are frequently used to align the reconstructed brain PET frames to remove subject head motion. However, in occupancy studies, this is a challenging task where competitive binding of a drug can further reduce the available signal for registration. The purpose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiao, Jieqing, Searle, Graham E., Schnabel, Julia A., Gunn, Roger N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0117-0
_version_ 1782386019643949056
author Jiao, Jieqing
Searle, Graham E.
Schnabel, Julia A.
Gunn, Roger N.
author_facet Jiao, Jieqing
Searle, Graham E.
Schnabel, Julia A.
Gunn, Roger N.
author_sort Jiao, Jieqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Image registration algorithms are frequently used to align the reconstructed brain PET frames to remove subject head motion. However, in occupancy studies, this is a challenging task where competitive binding of a drug can further reduce the available signal for registration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate two kinds of algorithms—a conventional frame-by-frame (FBF) registration and a recently introduced groupwise image registration (GIR), for motion correction of a dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy study. METHODS: The FBF method co-registers all the PET frames to a common reference based on normalised mutual information as the spatial similarity. The GIR method incorporates a pharmacokinetic model and conducts motion correction by maximising a likelihood function iteratively on tracer kinetics and subject motion. Data from eight healthy volunteers scanned with [11C]-(+)-PHNO pre- and post-administration of a range of doses of the D3 antagonist GSK618334 were used to compare the motion correction performance. RESULTS: The groupwise registration achieved improved motion correction results, both by visual inspection of the dynamic PET data and by the reduction of the variability in the outcome measures, and required no additional steps to exclude unsuccessfully realigned PET data for occupancy modelling as compared to frame-by-frame registration. Furthermore, for the groupwise method, the resultant binding potential estimates had reduced variation and bias for individual scans and improved half maximal effective concentration (EC(50)) estimates were obtained for the study as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the groupwise registration approach can provide improved motion correction of dynamic brain PET data as compared to frame-by-frame registration approaches for receptor occupancy studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40658-015-0117-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4538721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45387212015-08-20 Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches Jiao, Jieqing Searle, Graham E. Schnabel, Julia A. Gunn, Roger N. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Image registration algorithms are frequently used to align the reconstructed brain PET frames to remove subject head motion. However, in occupancy studies, this is a challenging task where competitive binding of a drug can further reduce the available signal for registration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate two kinds of algorithms—a conventional frame-by-frame (FBF) registration and a recently introduced groupwise image registration (GIR), for motion correction of a dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy study. METHODS: The FBF method co-registers all the PET frames to a common reference based on normalised mutual information as the spatial similarity. The GIR method incorporates a pharmacokinetic model and conducts motion correction by maximising a likelihood function iteratively on tracer kinetics and subject motion. Data from eight healthy volunteers scanned with [11C]-(+)-PHNO pre- and post-administration of a range of doses of the D3 antagonist GSK618334 were used to compare the motion correction performance. RESULTS: The groupwise registration achieved improved motion correction results, both by visual inspection of the dynamic PET data and by the reduction of the variability in the outcome measures, and required no additional steps to exclude unsuccessfully realigned PET data for occupancy modelling as compared to frame-by-frame registration. Furthermore, for the groupwise method, the resultant binding potential estimates had reduced variation and bias for individual scans and improved half maximal effective concentration (EC(50)) estimates were obtained for the study as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the groupwise registration approach can provide improved motion correction of dynamic brain PET data as compared to frame-by-frame registration approaches for receptor occupancy studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40658-015-0117-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4538721/ /pubmed/26501816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0117-0 Text en © Jiao et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jiao, Jieqing
Searle, Graham E.
Schnabel, Julia A.
Gunn, Roger N.
Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches
title Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches
title_full Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches
title_fullStr Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches
title_full_unstemmed Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches
title_short Impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine D3/D2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches
title_sort impact of image-based motion correction on dopamine d3/d2 receptor occupancy—comparison of groupwise and frame-by-frame registration approaches
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0117-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaojieqing impactofimagebasedmotioncorrectionondopamined3d2receptoroccupancycomparisonofgroupwiseandframebyframeregistrationapproaches
AT searlegrahame impactofimagebasedmotioncorrectionondopamined3d2receptoroccupancycomparisonofgroupwiseandframebyframeregistrationapproaches
AT schnabeljuliaa impactofimagebasedmotioncorrectionondopamined3d2receptoroccupancycomparisonofgroupwiseandframebyframeregistrationapproaches
AT gunnrogern impactofimagebasedmotioncorrectionondopamined3d2receptoroccupancycomparisonofgroupwiseandframebyframeregistrationapproaches