Cargando…

Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches

BACKGROUND: There is limited guidance on the design of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials. Current methodological literature focuses mainly on trials with cross-sectional data collection at discrete times, yet many recent stepped wedge trials do not follow this design. In this article, we prese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Copas, Andrew J., Lewis, James J., Thompson, Jennifer A., Davey, Calum, Baio, Gianluca, Hargreaves, James R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26279154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7
_version_ 1782386027753635840
author Copas, Andrew J.
Lewis, James J.
Thompson, Jennifer A.
Davey, Calum
Baio, Gianluca
Hargreaves, James R.
author_facet Copas, Andrew J.
Lewis, James J.
Thompson, Jennifer A.
Davey, Calum
Baio, Gianluca
Hargreaves, James R.
author_sort Copas, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is limited guidance on the design of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials. Current methodological literature focuses mainly on trials with cross-sectional data collection at discrete times, yet many recent stepped wedge trials do not follow this design. In this article, we present a typology to characterise the full range of stepped wedge designs, and offer guidance on several other design aspects. METHODS: We developed a framework to define and report the key characteristics of a stepped wedge trial, including cluster allocation and individual participation. We also considered the relative strengths and weaknesses of trials according to this framework. We classified recently published stepped wedge trials using this framework and identified illustrative case studies. We identified key design choices and developed guidance for each. RESULTS: We identified three main stepped wedge designs: those with a closed cohort, an open cohort, and a continuous recruitment short exposure design. In the first two designs, many individuals experience both control and intervention conditions. In the final design, individuals are recruited in continuous time as they become eligible and experience either the control or intervention condition, but not both, and then provide an outcome measurement at follow-up. While most stepped wedge trials use simple randomisation, stratification and restricted randomisation are often feasible and may be useful. Some recent studies collect outcome information from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period, but this contributes little to the primary analysis. Incomplete designs should be considered when the intervention cannot be implemented quickly. Carry-over effects can arise in stepped wedge trials with closed and open cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Stepped wedge trial designs should be reported more clearly. Researchers should consider the use of stratified and/or restricted randomisation. Trials should generally not commit resources to collect outcome data from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period. Though substantial carry-over effects are uncommon in stepped wedge trials, researchers should consider their possibility before conducting a trial with closed or open cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4538756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45387562015-08-18 Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches Copas, Andrew J. Lewis, James J. Thompson, Jennifer A. Davey, Calum Baio, Gianluca Hargreaves, James R. Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: There is limited guidance on the design of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials. Current methodological literature focuses mainly on trials with cross-sectional data collection at discrete times, yet many recent stepped wedge trials do not follow this design. In this article, we present a typology to characterise the full range of stepped wedge designs, and offer guidance on several other design aspects. METHODS: We developed a framework to define and report the key characteristics of a stepped wedge trial, including cluster allocation and individual participation. We also considered the relative strengths and weaknesses of trials according to this framework. We classified recently published stepped wedge trials using this framework and identified illustrative case studies. We identified key design choices and developed guidance for each. RESULTS: We identified three main stepped wedge designs: those with a closed cohort, an open cohort, and a continuous recruitment short exposure design. In the first two designs, many individuals experience both control and intervention conditions. In the final design, individuals are recruited in continuous time as they become eligible and experience either the control or intervention condition, but not both, and then provide an outcome measurement at follow-up. While most stepped wedge trials use simple randomisation, stratification and restricted randomisation are often feasible and may be useful. Some recent studies collect outcome information from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period, but this contributes little to the primary analysis. Incomplete designs should be considered when the intervention cannot be implemented quickly. Carry-over effects can arise in stepped wedge trials with closed and open cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Stepped wedge trial designs should be reported more clearly. Researchers should consider the use of stratified and/or restricted randomisation. Trials should generally not commit resources to collect outcome data from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period. Though substantial carry-over effects are uncommon in stepped wedge trials, researchers should consider their possibility before conducting a trial with closed or open cohorts. BioMed Central 2015-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4538756/ /pubmed/26279154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7 Text en © Copas et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Copas, Andrew J.
Lewis, James J.
Thompson, Jennifer A.
Davey, Calum
Baio, Gianluca
Hargreaves, James R.
Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
title Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
title_full Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
title_fullStr Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
title_full_unstemmed Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
title_short Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
title_sort designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26279154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7
work_keys_str_mv AT copasandrewj designingasteppedwedgetrialthreemaindesignscarryovereffectsandrandomisationapproaches
AT lewisjamesj designingasteppedwedgetrialthreemaindesignscarryovereffectsandrandomisationapproaches
AT thompsonjennifera designingasteppedwedgetrialthreemaindesignscarryovereffectsandrandomisationapproaches
AT daveycalum designingasteppedwedgetrialthreemaindesignscarryovereffectsandrandomisationapproaches
AT baiogianluca designingasteppedwedgetrialthreemaindesignscarryovereffectsandrandomisationapproaches
AT hargreavesjamesr designingasteppedwedgetrialthreemaindesignscarryovereffectsandrandomisationapproaches