Cargando…

Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is widely used to identify chromosomal binding sites. Chromatin proteins are cross-linked to their target sequences in living cells. The purified chromatin is sheared and the relevant protein is enriched by immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies. The co-pur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Dhawal, Baldi, Sandro, Zabel, Angelika, Straub, Tobias, Becker, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26117547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv637
_version_ 1782386041301237760
author Jain, Dhawal
Baldi, Sandro
Zabel, Angelika
Straub, Tobias
Becker, Peter B.
author_facet Jain, Dhawal
Baldi, Sandro
Zabel, Angelika
Straub, Tobias
Becker, Peter B.
author_sort Jain, Dhawal
collection PubMed
description Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is widely used to identify chromosomal binding sites. Chromatin proteins are cross-linked to their target sequences in living cells. The purified chromatin is sheared and the relevant protein is enriched by immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies. The co-purifying genomic DNA is then determined by massive parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq). We applied ChIP-seq to map the chromosomal binding sites for two ISWI-containing nucleosome remodeling factors, ACF and RSF, in Drosophila embryos. Employing several polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies directed against their signature subunits, ACF1 and RSF-1, robust profiles were obtained indicating that both remodelers co-occupied a large set of active promoters. Further validation included controls using chromatin of mutant embryos that do not express ACF1 or RSF-1. Surprisingly, the ChIP-seq profiles were unchanged, suggesting that they were not due to specific immunoprecipitation. Conservative analysis lists about 3000 chromosomal loci, mostly active promoters that are prone to non-specific enrichment in ChIP and appear as ‘Phantom Peaks’. These peaks are not obtained with pre-immune serum and are not prominent in input chromatin. Mining the modENCODE ChIP-seq profiles identifies potential Phantom Peaks in many profiles of epigenetic regulators. These profiles and other ChIP-seq data featuring prominent Phantom Peaks must be validated with chromatin from cells in which the protein of interest has been depleted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4538825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45388252015-08-18 Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments Jain, Dhawal Baldi, Sandro Zabel, Angelika Straub, Tobias Becker, Peter B. Nucleic Acids Res Genomics Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is widely used to identify chromosomal binding sites. Chromatin proteins are cross-linked to their target sequences in living cells. The purified chromatin is sheared and the relevant protein is enriched by immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies. The co-purifying genomic DNA is then determined by massive parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq). We applied ChIP-seq to map the chromosomal binding sites for two ISWI-containing nucleosome remodeling factors, ACF and RSF, in Drosophila embryos. Employing several polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies directed against their signature subunits, ACF1 and RSF-1, robust profiles were obtained indicating that both remodelers co-occupied a large set of active promoters. Further validation included controls using chromatin of mutant embryos that do not express ACF1 or RSF-1. Surprisingly, the ChIP-seq profiles were unchanged, suggesting that they were not due to specific immunoprecipitation. Conservative analysis lists about 3000 chromosomal loci, mostly active promoters that are prone to non-specific enrichment in ChIP and appear as ‘Phantom Peaks’. These peaks are not obtained with pre-immune serum and are not prominent in input chromatin. Mining the modENCODE ChIP-seq profiles identifies potential Phantom Peaks in many profiles of epigenetic regulators. These profiles and other ChIP-seq data featuring prominent Phantom Peaks must be validated with chromatin from cells in which the protein of interest has been depleted. Oxford University Press 2015-08-18 2015-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4538825/ /pubmed/26117547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv637 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genomics
Jain, Dhawal
Baldi, Sandro
Zabel, Angelika
Straub, Tobias
Becker, Peter B.
Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments
title Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments
title_full Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments
title_fullStr Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments
title_full_unstemmed Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments
title_short Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments
title_sort active promoters give rise to false positive ‘phantom peaks’ in chip-seq experiments
topic Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26117547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv637
work_keys_str_mv AT jaindhawal activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments
AT baldisandro activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments
AT zabelangelika activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments
AT straubtobias activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments
AT beckerpeterb activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments