Cargando…
Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is widely used to identify chromosomal binding sites. Chromatin proteins are cross-linked to their target sequences in living cells. The purified chromatin is sheared and the relevant protein is enriched by immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies. The co-pur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26117547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv637 |
_version_ | 1782386041301237760 |
---|---|
author | Jain, Dhawal Baldi, Sandro Zabel, Angelika Straub, Tobias Becker, Peter B. |
author_facet | Jain, Dhawal Baldi, Sandro Zabel, Angelika Straub, Tobias Becker, Peter B. |
author_sort | Jain, Dhawal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is widely used to identify chromosomal binding sites. Chromatin proteins are cross-linked to their target sequences in living cells. The purified chromatin is sheared and the relevant protein is enriched by immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies. The co-purifying genomic DNA is then determined by massive parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq). We applied ChIP-seq to map the chromosomal binding sites for two ISWI-containing nucleosome remodeling factors, ACF and RSF, in Drosophila embryos. Employing several polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies directed against their signature subunits, ACF1 and RSF-1, robust profiles were obtained indicating that both remodelers co-occupied a large set of active promoters. Further validation included controls using chromatin of mutant embryos that do not express ACF1 or RSF-1. Surprisingly, the ChIP-seq profiles were unchanged, suggesting that they were not due to specific immunoprecipitation. Conservative analysis lists about 3000 chromosomal loci, mostly active promoters that are prone to non-specific enrichment in ChIP and appear as ‘Phantom Peaks’. These peaks are not obtained with pre-immune serum and are not prominent in input chromatin. Mining the modENCODE ChIP-seq profiles identifies potential Phantom Peaks in many profiles of epigenetic regulators. These profiles and other ChIP-seq data featuring prominent Phantom Peaks must be validated with chromatin from cells in which the protein of interest has been depleted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4538825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45388252015-08-18 Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments Jain, Dhawal Baldi, Sandro Zabel, Angelika Straub, Tobias Becker, Peter B. Nucleic Acids Res Genomics Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is widely used to identify chromosomal binding sites. Chromatin proteins are cross-linked to their target sequences in living cells. The purified chromatin is sheared and the relevant protein is enriched by immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies. The co-purifying genomic DNA is then determined by massive parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq). We applied ChIP-seq to map the chromosomal binding sites for two ISWI-containing nucleosome remodeling factors, ACF and RSF, in Drosophila embryos. Employing several polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies directed against their signature subunits, ACF1 and RSF-1, robust profiles were obtained indicating that both remodelers co-occupied a large set of active promoters. Further validation included controls using chromatin of mutant embryos that do not express ACF1 or RSF-1. Surprisingly, the ChIP-seq profiles were unchanged, suggesting that they were not due to specific immunoprecipitation. Conservative analysis lists about 3000 chromosomal loci, mostly active promoters that are prone to non-specific enrichment in ChIP and appear as ‘Phantom Peaks’. These peaks are not obtained with pre-immune serum and are not prominent in input chromatin. Mining the modENCODE ChIP-seq profiles identifies potential Phantom Peaks in many profiles of epigenetic regulators. These profiles and other ChIP-seq data featuring prominent Phantom Peaks must be validated with chromatin from cells in which the protein of interest has been depleted. Oxford University Press 2015-08-18 2015-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4538825/ /pubmed/26117547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv637 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genomics Jain, Dhawal Baldi, Sandro Zabel, Angelika Straub, Tobias Becker, Peter B. Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments |
title | Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments |
title_full | Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments |
title_fullStr | Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments |
title_short | Active promoters give rise to false positive ‘Phantom Peaks’ in ChIP-seq experiments |
title_sort | active promoters give rise to false positive ‘phantom peaks’ in chip-seq experiments |
topic | Genomics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26117547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaindhawal activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments AT baldisandro activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments AT zabelangelika activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments AT straubtobias activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments AT beckerpeterb activepromotersgiverisetofalsepositivephantompeaksinchipseqexperiments |