Cargando…

Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?

A binary phylogenetic network may or may not be obtainable from a tree by the addition of directed edges (arcs) between tree arcs. Here, we establish a precise and easily tested criterion (based on “2-SAT”) that efficiently determines whether or not any given network can be realized in this way. Mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francis, Andrew R., Steel, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26070685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syv037
_version_ 1782386049668874240
author Francis, Andrew R.
Steel, Mike
author_facet Francis, Andrew R.
Steel, Mike
author_sort Francis, Andrew R.
collection PubMed
description A binary phylogenetic network may or may not be obtainable from a tree by the addition of directed edges (arcs) between tree arcs. Here, we establish a precise and easily tested criterion (based on “2-SAT”) that efficiently determines whether or not any given network can be realized in this way. Moreover, the proof provides a polynomial-time algorithm for finding one or more trees (when they exist) on which the network can be based. A number of interesting consequences are presented as corollaries; these lead to some further relevant questions and observations, which we outline in the conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4538883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45388832015-08-18 Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs? Francis, Andrew R. Steel, Mike Syst Biol Regular Articles A binary phylogenetic network may or may not be obtainable from a tree by the addition of directed edges (arcs) between tree arcs. Here, we establish a precise and easily tested criterion (based on “2-SAT”) that efficiently determines whether or not any given network can be realized in this way. Moreover, the proof provides a polynomial-time algorithm for finding one or more trees (when they exist) on which the network can be based. A number of interesting consequences are presented as corollaries; these lead to some further relevant questions and observations, which we outline in the conclusion. Oxford University Press 2015-09 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4538883/ /pubmed/26070685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syv037 Text en © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Francis, Andrew R.
Steel, Mike
Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?
title Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?
title_full Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?
title_fullStr Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?
title_full_unstemmed Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?
title_short Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?
title_sort which phylogenetic networks are merely trees with additional arcs?
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4538883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26070685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syv037
work_keys_str_mv AT francisandrewr whichphylogeneticnetworksaremerelytreeswithadditionalarcs
AT steelmike whichphylogeneticnetworksaremerelytreeswithadditionalarcs