Cargando…
Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that more intensive initial therapy for hypertension results in better long-term blood pressure (BP) control. We test this hypothesis comparing initial monotherapy with dual therapy in the management of essential hypertension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4539389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26253566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007645 |
_version_ | 1782386098414026752 |
---|---|
author | MacDonald, Thomas M Williams, Bryan Caulfield, Mark Cruickshank, J Kennedy McInnes, Gordon Sever, Peter Webb, David J Mackenzie, Isla S Salsbury, Jackie Morant, Steve Ford, Ian Brown, Morris J |
author_facet | MacDonald, Thomas M Williams, Bryan Caulfield, Mark Cruickshank, J Kennedy McInnes, Gordon Sever, Peter Webb, David J Mackenzie, Isla S Salsbury, Jackie Morant, Steve Ford, Ian Brown, Morris J |
author_sort | MacDonald, Thomas M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that more intensive initial therapy for hypertension results in better long-term blood pressure (BP) control. We test this hypothesis comparing initial monotherapy with dual therapy in the management of essential hypertension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, active-controlled trial in patients with essential hypertension. Around 50% of patients studied will be newly diagnosed and the others will be known hypertensives who previously received only monotherapy. The trial is divided into three phases as follows: Phase 1 (Week 0–Week 16): Randomised, parallel-group, masked assignation to either combination or monotherapy. Phase 2 (Week 17–Week 32): Open-label combination therapy. Phase 3 (Week 33–Week 52): Open-label combination therapy plus open-label add-on (if BP is above 140/90 mm Hg). Hierarchical primary end points are: a comparison of home BP (home systolic blood pressure (HSBP)) averaged over the duration of phase 1 and 2 in the combination versus monotherapy arms. If combination is superior in this analysis, then the averaged mean HSBP between initial monotherapy and initial combination therapy at the end of phase 2 will be compared. Secondary end points include: BP control at 1 year; the role of age, baseline renin, sodium status, plasma volume, haemodynamic compensation and peripheral resistance on BP control; validation of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence/British Hypertension Society joint guideline algorithm; safety and tolerability of combination therapy; and the impact of combination versus monotherapy on left ventricular mass and aortic pulse wave velocity. A sample size of 536 (268 in each group) will have 90% power to detect a difference in means of 4 mm Hg. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: PATHWAY 1 was approved by UK ethics (REC Reference 09/H0308/132). Trial results will be published and all participating subjects will be informed of the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UKCRN 4499 and EudraCT number 2008-007749-29 registered 27/08/2009. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4539389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45393892015-08-21 Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial MacDonald, Thomas M Williams, Bryan Caulfield, Mark Cruickshank, J Kennedy McInnes, Gordon Sever, Peter Webb, David J Mackenzie, Isla S Salsbury, Jackie Morant, Steve Ford, Ian Brown, Morris J BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that more intensive initial therapy for hypertension results in better long-term blood pressure (BP) control. We test this hypothesis comparing initial monotherapy with dual therapy in the management of essential hypertension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, active-controlled trial in patients with essential hypertension. Around 50% of patients studied will be newly diagnosed and the others will be known hypertensives who previously received only monotherapy. The trial is divided into three phases as follows: Phase 1 (Week 0–Week 16): Randomised, parallel-group, masked assignation to either combination or monotherapy. Phase 2 (Week 17–Week 32): Open-label combination therapy. Phase 3 (Week 33–Week 52): Open-label combination therapy plus open-label add-on (if BP is above 140/90 mm Hg). Hierarchical primary end points are: a comparison of home BP (home systolic blood pressure (HSBP)) averaged over the duration of phase 1 and 2 in the combination versus monotherapy arms. If combination is superior in this analysis, then the averaged mean HSBP between initial monotherapy and initial combination therapy at the end of phase 2 will be compared. Secondary end points include: BP control at 1 year; the role of age, baseline renin, sodium status, plasma volume, haemodynamic compensation and peripheral resistance on BP control; validation of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence/British Hypertension Society joint guideline algorithm; safety and tolerability of combination therapy; and the impact of combination versus monotherapy on left ventricular mass and aortic pulse wave velocity. A sample size of 536 (268 in each group) will have 90% power to detect a difference in means of 4 mm Hg. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: PATHWAY 1 was approved by UK ethics (REC Reference 09/H0308/132). Trial results will be published and all participating subjects will be informed of the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UKCRN 4499 and EudraCT number 2008-007749-29 registered 27/08/2009. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4539389/ /pubmed/26253566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007645 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine MacDonald, Thomas M Williams, Bryan Caulfield, Mark Cruickshank, J Kennedy McInnes, Gordon Sever, Peter Webb, David J Mackenzie, Isla S Salsbury, Jackie Morant, Steve Ford, Ian Brown, Morris J Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial |
title | Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial |
title_full | Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial |
title_short | Monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (PATHWAY-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial |
title_sort | monotherapy versus dual therapy for the initial treatment of hypertension (pathway-1): a randomised double-blind controlled trial |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4539389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26253566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macdonaldthomasm monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT williamsbryan monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT caulfieldmark monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT cruickshankjkennedy monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT mcinnesgordon monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT severpeter monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT webbdavidj monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT mackenzieislas monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT salsburyjackie monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT morantsteve monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT fordian monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT brownmorrisj monotherapyversusdualtherapyfortheinitialtreatmentofhypertensionpathway1arandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial |