Cargando…

Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant

Plant recovery rates after herbivory are thought to be a key factor driving recursion by herbivores to sites and plants to optimise resource-use but have not been investigated as an explanation for recursion in large herbivores. We investigated the relationship between plant recovery and recursion b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: English, Megan, Gillespie, Graeme, Goossens, Benoit, Ismail, Sulaiman, Ancrenaz, Marc, Linklater, Wayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290779
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1030
_version_ 1782386190031257600
author English, Megan
Gillespie, Graeme
Goossens, Benoit
Ismail, Sulaiman
Ancrenaz, Marc
Linklater, Wayne
author_facet English, Megan
Gillespie, Graeme
Goossens, Benoit
Ismail, Sulaiman
Ancrenaz, Marc
Linklater, Wayne
author_sort English, Megan
collection PubMed
description Plant recovery rates after herbivory are thought to be a key factor driving recursion by herbivores to sites and plants to optimise resource-use but have not been investigated as an explanation for recursion in large herbivores. We investigated the relationship between plant recovery and recursion by elephants (Elephas maximus borneensis) in the Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary, Sabah. We identified 182 recently eaten food plants, from 30 species, along 14 × 50 m transects and measured their recovery growth each month over nine months or until they were re-browsed by elephants. The monthly growth in leaf and branch or shoot length for each plant was used to calculate the time required (months) for each species to recover to its pre-eaten length. Elephant returned to all but two transects with 10 eaten plants, a further 26 plants died leaving 146 plants that could be re-eaten. Recursion occurred to 58% of all plants and 12 of the 30 species. Seventy-seven percent of the re-eaten plants were grasses. Recovery times to all plants varied from two to twenty months depending on the species. Recursion to all grasses coincided with plant recovery whereas recursion to most browsed plants occurred four to twelve months before they had recovered to their previous length. The small sample size of many browsed plants that received recursion and uneven plant species distribution across transects limits our ability to generalise for most browsed species but a prominent pattern in plant-scale recursion did emerge. Plant recovery time was a good predictor of time to recursion but varied as a function of growth form (grass, ginger, palm, liana and woody) and differences between sites. Time to plant recursion coincided with plant recovery time for the elephant’s preferred food, grasses, and perhaps also gingers, but not the other browsed species. Elephants are bulk feeders so it is likely that they time their returns to bulk feed on these grass species when quantities have recovered sufficiently to meet their intake requirements. The implications for habitat and elephant management are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4540050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45400502015-08-19 Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant English, Megan Gillespie, Graeme Goossens, Benoit Ismail, Sulaiman Ancrenaz, Marc Linklater, Wayne PeerJ Animal Behavior Plant recovery rates after herbivory are thought to be a key factor driving recursion by herbivores to sites and plants to optimise resource-use but have not been investigated as an explanation for recursion in large herbivores. We investigated the relationship between plant recovery and recursion by elephants (Elephas maximus borneensis) in the Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary, Sabah. We identified 182 recently eaten food plants, from 30 species, along 14 × 50 m transects and measured their recovery growth each month over nine months or until they were re-browsed by elephants. The monthly growth in leaf and branch or shoot length for each plant was used to calculate the time required (months) for each species to recover to its pre-eaten length. Elephant returned to all but two transects with 10 eaten plants, a further 26 plants died leaving 146 plants that could be re-eaten. Recursion occurred to 58% of all plants and 12 of the 30 species. Seventy-seven percent of the re-eaten plants were grasses. Recovery times to all plants varied from two to twenty months depending on the species. Recursion to all grasses coincided with plant recovery whereas recursion to most browsed plants occurred four to twelve months before they had recovered to their previous length. The small sample size of many browsed plants that received recursion and uneven plant species distribution across transects limits our ability to generalise for most browsed species but a prominent pattern in plant-scale recursion did emerge. Plant recovery time was a good predictor of time to recursion but varied as a function of growth form (grass, ginger, palm, liana and woody) and differences between sites. Time to plant recursion coincided with plant recovery time for the elephant’s preferred food, grasses, and perhaps also gingers, but not the other browsed species. Elephants are bulk feeders so it is likely that they time their returns to bulk feed on these grass species when quantities have recovered sufficiently to meet their intake requirements. The implications for habitat and elephant management are discussed. PeerJ Inc. 2015-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4540050/ /pubmed/26290779 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1030 Text en © 2015 English et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
English, Megan
Gillespie, Graeme
Goossens, Benoit
Ismail, Sulaiman
Ancrenaz, Marc
Linklater, Wayne
Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant
title Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant
title_full Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant
title_fullStr Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant
title_full_unstemmed Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant
title_short Recursion to food plants by free-ranging Bornean elephant
title_sort recursion to food plants by free-ranging bornean elephant
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290779
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1030
work_keys_str_mv AT englishmegan recursiontofoodplantsbyfreerangingborneanelephant
AT gillespiegraeme recursiontofoodplantsbyfreerangingborneanelephant
AT goossensbenoit recursiontofoodplantsbyfreerangingborneanelephant
AT ismailsulaiman recursiontofoodplantsbyfreerangingborneanelephant
AT ancrenazmarc recursiontofoodplantsbyfreerangingborneanelephant
AT linklaterwayne recursiontofoodplantsbyfreerangingborneanelephant