Cargando…

Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the indicators and proxy variables for the quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies and evaluates the relative importance of each assessment element by consulting experts from the fields of ecology, chemistry, safety, and public health. METHODS: The res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sungjune, Hong, Seokpyo, Ahn, Kilsoo, Gong, Sungyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206364
http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eht.s2015003
_version_ 1782386199835443200
author Kim, Sungjune
Hong, Seokpyo
Ahn, Kilsoo
Gong, Sungyong
author_facet Kim, Sungjune
Hong, Seokpyo
Ahn, Kilsoo
Gong, Sungyong
author_sort Kim, Sungjune
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study presents the indicators and proxy variables for the quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies and evaluates the relative importance of each assessment element by consulting experts from the fields of ecology, chemistry, safety, and public health. METHODS: The results collected were subjected to an analytic hierarchy process to obtain the weights of the indicators and the proxy variables. RESULTS: These weights may prove useful in avoiding having to resort to qualitative means in absence of weights between indicators when integrating the results of quantitative assessment by indicator. CONCLUSIONS: This study points to the limitations of current quantitative assessment techniques for green chemistry technologies and seeks to present the future direction for quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4540126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45401262015-08-21 Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment Kim, Sungjune Hong, Seokpyo Ahn, Kilsoo Gong, Sungyong Environ Health Toxicol Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study presents the indicators and proxy variables for the quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies and evaluates the relative importance of each assessment element by consulting experts from the fields of ecology, chemistry, safety, and public health. METHODS: The results collected were subjected to an analytic hierarchy process to obtain the weights of the indicators and the proxy variables. RESULTS: These weights may prove useful in avoiding having to resort to qualitative means in absence of weights between indicators when integrating the results of quantitative assessment by indicator. CONCLUSIONS: This study points to the limitations of current quantitative assessment techniques for green chemistry technologies and seeks to present the future direction for quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies. The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4540126/ /pubmed/26206364 http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eht.s2015003 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sungjune
Hong, Seokpyo
Ahn, Kilsoo
Gong, Sungyong
Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment
title Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment
title_full Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment
title_fullStr Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment
title_full_unstemmed Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment
title_short Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment
title_sort priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206364
http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eht.s2015003
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsungjune prioritysurveybetweenindicatorsandanalytichierarchyprocessanalysisforgreenchemistrytechnologyassessment
AT hongseokpyo prioritysurveybetweenindicatorsandanalytichierarchyprocessanalysisforgreenchemistrytechnologyassessment
AT ahnkilsoo prioritysurveybetweenindicatorsandanalytichierarchyprocessanalysisforgreenchemistrytechnologyassessment
AT gongsungyong prioritysurveybetweenindicatorsandanalytichierarchyprocessanalysisforgreenchemistrytechnologyassessment