Cargando…
Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers
Experimental proof is provided of an unconventional seismic design concept, which is based on deliberately underdesigning shallow foundations to promote intense rocking oscillations and thereby to dramatically improve the seismic resilience of structures. Termed rocking isolation, this new seismic d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2451 |
_version_ | 1782386206459297792 |
---|---|
author | Loli, Marianna Knappett, Jonathan A Brown, Michael J Anastasopoulos, Ioannis Gazetas, George |
author_facet | Loli, Marianna Knappett, Jonathan A Brown, Michael J Anastasopoulos, Ioannis Gazetas, George |
author_sort | Loli, Marianna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Experimental proof is provided of an unconventional seismic design concept, which is based on deliberately underdesigning shallow foundations to promote intense rocking oscillations and thereby to dramatically improve the seismic resilience of structures. Termed rocking isolation, this new seismic design philosophy is investigated through a series of dynamic centrifuge experiments on properly scaled models of a modern reinforced concrete (RC) bridge pier. The experimental method reproduces the nonlinear and inelastic response of both the soil-footing interface and the structure. To this end, a novel scale model RC (1:50 scale) that simulates reasonably well the elastic response and the failure of prototype RC elements is utilized, along with realistic representation of the soil behavior in a geotechnical centrifuge. A variety of seismic ground motions are considered as excitations. They result in consistent demonstrably beneficial performance of the rocking-isolated pier in comparison with the one designed conventionally. Seismic demand is reduced in terms of both inertial load and deck drift. Furthermore, foundation uplifting has a self-centering potential, whereas soil yielding is shown to provide a particularly effective energy dissipation mechanism, exhibiting significant resistance to cumulative damage. Thanks to such mechanisms, the rocking pier survived, with no signs of structural distress, a deleterious sequence of seismic motions that caused collapse of the conventionally designed pier. © 2014 The Authors Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4540162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45401622015-08-21 Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers Loli, Marianna Knappett, Jonathan A Brown, Michael J Anastasopoulos, Ioannis Gazetas, George Earthq Eng Struct Dyn Research Articles Experimental proof is provided of an unconventional seismic design concept, which is based on deliberately underdesigning shallow foundations to promote intense rocking oscillations and thereby to dramatically improve the seismic resilience of structures. Termed rocking isolation, this new seismic design philosophy is investigated through a series of dynamic centrifuge experiments on properly scaled models of a modern reinforced concrete (RC) bridge pier. The experimental method reproduces the nonlinear and inelastic response of both the soil-footing interface and the structure. To this end, a novel scale model RC (1:50 scale) that simulates reasonably well the elastic response and the failure of prototype RC elements is utilized, along with realistic representation of the soil behavior in a geotechnical centrifuge. A variety of seismic ground motions are considered as excitations. They result in consistent demonstrably beneficial performance of the rocking-isolated pier in comparison with the one designed conventionally. Seismic demand is reduced in terms of both inertial load and deck drift. Furthermore, foundation uplifting has a self-centering potential, whereas soil yielding is shown to provide a particularly effective energy dissipation mechanism, exhibiting significant resistance to cumulative damage. Thanks to such mechanisms, the rocking pier survived, with no signs of structural distress, a deleterious sequence of seismic motions that caused collapse of the conventionally designed pier. © 2014 The Authors Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-12 2014-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4540162/ /pubmed/26300573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2451 Text en © 2014 The Authors Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Loli, Marianna Knappett, Jonathan A Brown, Michael J Anastasopoulos, Ioannis Gazetas, George Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers |
title | Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers |
title_full | Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers |
title_fullStr | Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers |
title_full_unstemmed | Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers |
title_short | Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers |
title_sort | centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic rc bridge piers |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lolimarianna centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers AT knappettjonathana centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers AT brownmichaelj centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers AT anastasopoulosioannis centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers AT gazetasgeorge centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers |