Cargando…

Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers

Experimental proof is provided of an unconventional seismic design concept, which is based on deliberately underdesigning shallow foundations to promote intense rocking oscillations and thereby to dramatically improve the seismic resilience of structures. Termed rocking isolation, this new seismic d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loli, Marianna, Knappett, Jonathan A, Brown, Michael J, Anastasopoulos, Ioannis, Gazetas, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2451
_version_ 1782386206459297792
author Loli, Marianna
Knappett, Jonathan A
Brown, Michael J
Anastasopoulos, Ioannis
Gazetas, George
author_facet Loli, Marianna
Knappett, Jonathan A
Brown, Michael J
Anastasopoulos, Ioannis
Gazetas, George
author_sort Loli, Marianna
collection PubMed
description Experimental proof is provided of an unconventional seismic design concept, which is based on deliberately underdesigning shallow foundations to promote intense rocking oscillations and thereby to dramatically improve the seismic resilience of structures. Termed rocking isolation, this new seismic design philosophy is investigated through a series of dynamic centrifuge experiments on properly scaled models of a modern reinforced concrete (RC) bridge pier. The experimental method reproduces the nonlinear and inelastic response of both the soil-footing interface and the structure. To this end, a novel scale model RC (1:50 scale) that simulates reasonably well the elastic response and the failure of prototype RC elements is utilized, along with realistic representation of the soil behavior in a geotechnical centrifuge. A variety of seismic ground motions are considered as excitations. They result in consistent demonstrably beneficial performance of the rocking-isolated pier in comparison with the one designed conventionally. Seismic demand is reduced in terms of both inertial load and deck drift. Furthermore, foundation uplifting has a self-centering potential, whereas soil yielding is shown to provide a particularly effective energy dissipation mechanism, exhibiting significant resistance to cumulative damage. Thanks to such mechanisms, the rocking pier survived, with no signs of structural distress, a deleterious sequence of seismic motions that caused collapse of the conventionally designed pier. © 2014 The Authors Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4540162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45401622015-08-21 Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers Loli, Marianna Knappett, Jonathan A Brown, Michael J Anastasopoulos, Ioannis Gazetas, George Earthq Eng Struct Dyn Research Articles Experimental proof is provided of an unconventional seismic design concept, which is based on deliberately underdesigning shallow foundations to promote intense rocking oscillations and thereby to dramatically improve the seismic resilience of structures. Termed rocking isolation, this new seismic design philosophy is investigated through a series of dynamic centrifuge experiments on properly scaled models of a modern reinforced concrete (RC) bridge pier. The experimental method reproduces the nonlinear and inelastic response of both the soil-footing interface and the structure. To this end, a novel scale model RC (1:50 scale) that simulates reasonably well the elastic response and the failure of prototype RC elements is utilized, along with realistic representation of the soil behavior in a geotechnical centrifuge. A variety of seismic ground motions are considered as excitations. They result in consistent demonstrably beneficial performance of the rocking-isolated pier in comparison with the one designed conventionally. Seismic demand is reduced in terms of both inertial load and deck drift. Furthermore, foundation uplifting has a self-centering potential, whereas soil yielding is shown to provide a particularly effective energy dissipation mechanism, exhibiting significant resistance to cumulative damage. Thanks to such mechanisms, the rocking pier survived, with no signs of structural distress, a deleterious sequence of seismic motions that caused collapse of the conventionally designed pier. © 2014 The Authors Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-12 2014-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4540162/ /pubmed/26300573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2451 Text en © 2014 The Authors Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Loli, Marianna
Knappett, Jonathan A
Brown, Michael J
Anastasopoulos, Ioannis
Gazetas, George
Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers
title Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers
title_full Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers
title_fullStr Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers
title_full_unstemmed Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers
title_short Centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic RC bridge piers
title_sort centrifuge modeling of rocking-isolated inelastic rc bridge piers
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2451
work_keys_str_mv AT lolimarianna centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers
AT knappettjonathana centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers
AT brownmichaelj centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers
AT anastasopoulosioannis centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers
AT gazetasgeorge centrifugemodelingofrockingisolatedinelasticrcbridgepiers