Cargando…

An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units

BACKGROUND: Kidney Failure is epidemic in many remote communities in Canada. In-centre hemodialysis is provided within these settings in satellite hemodialysis units. The key cost drivers of this program have not been fully described. Such information is important in informing the design of programs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Thomas W., Zacharias, James, Walker, Simon R., Collister, David, Rigatto, Claudio, Tangri, Navdeep, Komenda, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26284357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135587
_version_ 1782386274724741120
author Ferguson, Thomas W.
Zacharias, James
Walker, Simon R.
Collister, David
Rigatto, Claudio
Tangri, Navdeep
Komenda, Paul
author_facet Ferguson, Thomas W.
Zacharias, James
Walker, Simon R.
Collister, David
Rigatto, Claudio
Tangri, Navdeep
Komenda, Paul
author_sort Ferguson, Thomas W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kidney Failure is epidemic in many remote communities in Canada. In-centre hemodialysis is provided within these settings in satellite hemodialysis units. The key cost drivers of this program have not been fully described. Such information is important in informing the design of programs aimed at optimizing efficiency in providing dialysis and preventative chronic kidney disease care in remote communities. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We constructed a cost model based on data derived from 16 of Manitoba, Canada’s remote satellite units. We included all costs for operation of the unit, transportation, treatment, and capital costs. All costs were presented in 2013 Canadian dollars. RESULTS: The annual per-patient cost of providing hemodialysis in the satellite units ranged from $80,372 to $215,918 per patient, per year. The median per patient, per year cost was $99,888 (IQR $89,057—$122,640). Primary cost drivers were capital costs related to construction, human resource expenses, and expenses for return to tertiary care centres for health care. Costs related to transport considerably increased estimates in units that required plane or helicopter transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Satellite hemodialysis units in remote areas are more expensive on a per-patient basis than hospital hemodialysis and satellite hemodialysis available in urban areas. In some rural, remote locations, better value for money may reside in local surveillance and prevention programs in addition support for home dialysis therapies over construction of new satellite hemodialysis units.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4540589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45405892015-08-24 An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units Ferguson, Thomas W. Zacharias, James Walker, Simon R. Collister, David Rigatto, Claudio Tangri, Navdeep Komenda, Paul PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Kidney Failure is epidemic in many remote communities in Canada. In-centre hemodialysis is provided within these settings in satellite hemodialysis units. The key cost drivers of this program have not been fully described. Such information is important in informing the design of programs aimed at optimizing efficiency in providing dialysis and preventative chronic kidney disease care in remote communities. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We constructed a cost model based on data derived from 16 of Manitoba, Canada’s remote satellite units. We included all costs for operation of the unit, transportation, treatment, and capital costs. All costs were presented in 2013 Canadian dollars. RESULTS: The annual per-patient cost of providing hemodialysis in the satellite units ranged from $80,372 to $215,918 per patient, per year. The median per patient, per year cost was $99,888 (IQR $89,057—$122,640). Primary cost drivers were capital costs related to construction, human resource expenses, and expenses for return to tertiary care centres for health care. Costs related to transport considerably increased estimates in units that required plane or helicopter transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Satellite hemodialysis units in remote areas are more expensive on a per-patient basis than hospital hemodialysis and satellite hemodialysis available in urban areas. In some rural, remote locations, better value for money may reside in local surveillance and prevention programs in addition support for home dialysis therapies over construction of new satellite hemodialysis units. Public Library of Science 2015-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4540589/ /pubmed/26284357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135587 Text en © 2015 Ferguson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferguson, Thomas W.
Zacharias, James
Walker, Simon R.
Collister, David
Rigatto, Claudio
Tangri, Navdeep
Komenda, Paul
An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units
title An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units
title_full An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units
title_fullStr An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units
title_full_unstemmed An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units
title_short An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units
title_sort economic assessment model of rural and remote satellite hemodialysis units
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26284357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135587
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonthomasw aneconomicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT zachariasjames aneconomicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT walkersimonr aneconomicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT collisterdavid aneconomicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT rigattoclaudio aneconomicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT tangrinavdeep aneconomicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT komendapaul aneconomicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT fergusonthomasw economicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT zachariasjames economicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT walkersimonr economicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT collisterdavid economicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT rigattoclaudio economicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT tangrinavdeep economicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits
AT komendapaul economicassessmentmodelofruralandremotesatellitehemodialysisunits