Cargando…

Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation

[Purpose] The present study aimed to examine the test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. [Subjects and Methods] We recruited 18 patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. All patients had impaired...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morino, Akira, Shida, Masahiro, Tanaka, Masashi, Sato, Kimihiro, Seko, Toshiaki, Ito, Shunsuke, Ogawa, Shunichi, Takahashi, Naoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2163
_version_ 1782386296188043264
author Morino, Akira
Shida, Masahiro
Tanaka, Masashi
Sato, Kimihiro
Seko, Toshiaki
Ito, Shunsuke
Ogawa, Shunichi
Takahashi, Naoaki
author_facet Morino, Akira
Shida, Masahiro
Tanaka, Masashi
Sato, Kimihiro
Seko, Toshiaki
Ito, Shunsuke
Ogawa, Shunichi
Takahashi, Naoaki
author_sort Morino, Akira
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The present study aimed to examine the test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. [Subjects and Methods] We recruited 18 patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. All patients had impaired consciousness. The mode of the ventilator was synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. The abdomen above the navel was vertically compressed using a handheld dynamometer in synchronization with expiration. Expiratory abdominal compression was performed two times. We measured the tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression. There was an interval of 5 minutes between the first and second measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to examine the test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer. [Results] The test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression was excellent (ICC(1, 1): 0.987). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there was no fixed bias and no proportional bias. [Conclusion] The findings of this study suggest that expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer is reliable and useful for patients with respiratory failure and prolonged mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4540841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45408412015-08-26 Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation Morino, Akira Shida, Masahiro Tanaka, Masashi Sato, Kimihiro Seko, Toshiaki Ito, Shunsuke Ogawa, Shunichi Takahashi, Naoaki J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The present study aimed to examine the test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. [Subjects and Methods] We recruited 18 patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. All patients had impaired consciousness. The mode of the ventilator was synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. The abdomen above the navel was vertically compressed using a handheld dynamometer in synchronization with expiration. Expiratory abdominal compression was performed two times. We measured the tidal volume during expiratory abdominal compression. There was an interval of 5 minutes between the first and second measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to examine the test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer. [Results] The test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression was excellent (ICC(1, 1): 0.987). Bland-Altman analysis showed that there was no fixed bias and no proportional bias. [Conclusion] The findings of this study suggest that expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer is reliable and useful for patients with respiratory failure and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-07-22 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4540841/ /pubmed/26311946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2163 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Morino, Akira
Shida, Masahiro
Tanaka, Masashi
Sato, Kimihiro
Seko, Toshiaki
Ito, Shunsuke
Ogawa, Shunichi
Takahashi, Naoaki
Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
title Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_full Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_fullStr Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_short Test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_sort test-retest reliability of expiratory abdominal compression with a handheld dynamometer in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2163
work_keys_str_mv AT morinoakira testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT shidamasahiro testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT tanakamasashi testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT satokimihiro testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT sekotoshiaki testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT itoshunsuke testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT ogawashunichi testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT takahashinaoaki testretestreliabilityofexpiratoryabdominalcompressionwithahandhelddynamometerinpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilation