Cargando…
Comparison of the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly. [Subjects and Methods] The study included 30 elderly women from D city. The subjects were divided into the following two g...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4540875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2337 |
Sumario: | [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly. [Subjects and Methods] The study included 30 elderly women from D city. The subjects were divided into the following two groups, according to the training position: the sitting group (n = 15) and standing group (n = 15). Both groups performed training for 20 min, thrice a week for 8 weeks. The short form of the berg balance scale (SFBBS), timed 10-m walk test (10MWT), timed up & go test (TUG), and falls efficacy scale (FES) were used before and after training. [Results] SFBBS, 10MWT, and TUG values were significantly different between before and after training in both groups. However, FES values were significantly different in only the standing group. [Conclusion] Balance training in a standing position is helpful for improving activities that mainly use the lower extremities, such as gait, and training in a sitting position is somewhat helpful for improving balance ability. In addition, balance training in both positions can help overcome the fear of falling. |
---|