Cargando…
Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
The alarm calls of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) constitute the classic textbook example of semantic communication in nonhuman animals, as vervet monkeys give acoustically distinct calls to different predators and these calls elicit appropriate responses in conspecifics. They also give si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13220 |
_version_ | 1782386333992353792 |
---|---|
author | Price, Tabitha Wadewitz, Philip Cheney, Dorothy Seyfarth, Robert Hammerschmidt, Kurt Fischer, Julia |
author_facet | Price, Tabitha Wadewitz, Philip Cheney, Dorothy Seyfarth, Robert Hammerschmidt, Kurt Fischer, Julia |
author_sort | Price, Tabitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | The alarm calls of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) constitute the classic textbook example of semantic communication in nonhuman animals, as vervet monkeys give acoustically distinct calls to different predators and these calls elicit appropriate responses in conspecifics. They also give similar sounding calls in aggressive contexts, however. Despite the central role the vervet alarm calls have played for understanding the evolution of communication, a comprehensive, quantitative analysis of the acoustic structure of these calls was lacking. We used 2-step cluster analysis to identify objective call types and discriminant function analysis to assess context specificity. Alarm calls given in response to leopards, eagles, and snakes could be well distinguished, while the inclusion of calls given in aggressive contexts yielded some overlap, specifically between female calls given to snakes, eagles and during aggression, as well as between male vervet barks (additionally recorded in South Africa) in leopard and aggressive contexts. We suggest that both cognitive appraisal of the situation and internal state contribute to the variation in call usage and structure. While the semantic properties of vervet alarm calls bear little resemblance to human words, the existing acoustic variation, possibly together with additional contextual information, allows listeners to select appropriate responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4541072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45410722015-08-31 Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity Price, Tabitha Wadewitz, Philip Cheney, Dorothy Seyfarth, Robert Hammerschmidt, Kurt Fischer, Julia Sci Rep Article The alarm calls of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) constitute the classic textbook example of semantic communication in nonhuman animals, as vervet monkeys give acoustically distinct calls to different predators and these calls elicit appropriate responses in conspecifics. They also give similar sounding calls in aggressive contexts, however. Despite the central role the vervet alarm calls have played for understanding the evolution of communication, a comprehensive, quantitative analysis of the acoustic structure of these calls was lacking. We used 2-step cluster analysis to identify objective call types and discriminant function analysis to assess context specificity. Alarm calls given in response to leopards, eagles, and snakes could be well distinguished, while the inclusion of calls given in aggressive contexts yielded some overlap, specifically between female calls given to snakes, eagles and during aggression, as well as between male vervet barks (additionally recorded in South Africa) in leopard and aggressive contexts. We suggest that both cognitive appraisal of the situation and internal state contribute to the variation in call usage and structure. While the semantic properties of vervet alarm calls bear little resemblance to human words, the existing acoustic variation, possibly together with additional contextual information, allows listeners to select appropriate responses. Nature Publishing Group 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4541072/ /pubmed/26286236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13220 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Price, Tabitha Wadewitz, Philip Cheney, Dorothy Seyfarth, Robert Hammerschmidt, Kurt Fischer, Julia Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity |
title | Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity |
title_full | Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity |
title_fullStr | Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity |
title_full_unstemmed | Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity |
title_short | Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity |
title_sort | vervets revisited: a quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pricetabitha vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity AT wadewitzphilip vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity AT cheneydorothy vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity AT seyfarthrobert vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity AT hammerschmidtkurt vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity AT fischerjulia vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity |