Cargando…

Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity

The alarm calls of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) constitute the classic textbook example of semantic communication in nonhuman animals, as vervet monkeys give acoustically distinct calls to different predators and these calls elicit appropriate responses in conspecifics. They also give si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Price, Tabitha, Wadewitz, Philip, Cheney, Dorothy, Seyfarth, Robert, Hammerschmidt, Kurt, Fischer, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13220
_version_ 1782386333992353792
author Price, Tabitha
Wadewitz, Philip
Cheney, Dorothy
Seyfarth, Robert
Hammerschmidt, Kurt
Fischer, Julia
author_facet Price, Tabitha
Wadewitz, Philip
Cheney, Dorothy
Seyfarth, Robert
Hammerschmidt, Kurt
Fischer, Julia
author_sort Price, Tabitha
collection PubMed
description The alarm calls of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) constitute the classic textbook example of semantic communication in nonhuman animals, as vervet monkeys give acoustically distinct calls to different predators and these calls elicit appropriate responses in conspecifics. They also give similar sounding calls in aggressive contexts, however. Despite the central role the vervet alarm calls have played for understanding the evolution of communication, a comprehensive, quantitative analysis of the acoustic structure of these calls was lacking. We used 2-step cluster analysis to identify objective call types and discriminant function analysis to assess context specificity. Alarm calls given in response to leopards, eagles, and snakes could be well distinguished, while the inclusion of calls given in aggressive contexts yielded some overlap, specifically between female calls given to snakes, eagles and during aggression, as well as between male vervet barks (additionally recorded in South Africa) in leopard and aggressive contexts. We suggest that both cognitive appraisal of the situation and internal state contribute to the variation in call usage and structure. While the semantic properties of vervet alarm calls bear little resemblance to human words, the existing acoustic variation, possibly together with additional contextual information, allows listeners to select appropriate responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4541072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45410722015-08-31 Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity Price, Tabitha Wadewitz, Philip Cheney, Dorothy Seyfarth, Robert Hammerschmidt, Kurt Fischer, Julia Sci Rep Article The alarm calls of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) constitute the classic textbook example of semantic communication in nonhuman animals, as vervet monkeys give acoustically distinct calls to different predators and these calls elicit appropriate responses in conspecifics. They also give similar sounding calls in aggressive contexts, however. Despite the central role the vervet alarm calls have played for understanding the evolution of communication, a comprehensive, quantitative analysis of the acoustic structure of these calls was lacking. We used 2-step cluster analysis to identify objective call types and discriminant function analysis to assess context specificity. Alarm calls given in response to leopards, eagles, and snakes could be well distinguished, while the inclusion of calls given in aggressive contexts yielded some overlap, specifically between female calls given to snakes, eagles and during aggression, as well as between male vervet barks (additionally recorded in South Africa) in leopard and aggressive contexts. We suggest that both cognitive appraisal of the situation and internal state contribute to the variation in call usage and structure. While the semantic properties of vervet alarm calls bear little resemblance to human words, the existing acoustic variation, possibly together with additional contextual information, allows listeners to select appropriate responses. Nature Publishing Group 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4541072/ /pubmed/26286236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13220 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Price, Tabitha
Wadewitz, Philip
Cheney, Dorothy
Seyfarth, Robert
Hammerschmidt, Kurt
Fischer, Julia
Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
title Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
title_full Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
title_fullStr Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
title_full_unstemmed Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
title_short Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
title_sort vervets revisited: a quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13220
work_keys_str_mv AT pricetabitha vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity
AT wadewitzphilip vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity
AT cheneydorothy vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity
AT seyfarthrobert vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity
AT hammerschmidtkurt vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity
AT fischerjulia vervetsrevisitedaquantitativeanalysisofalarmcallstructureandcontextspecificity