Cargando…
Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach
Trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, and almost 30% of trauma deaths are due to blood loss. A number of concerns have been raised regarding the advisability of the classic principles of aggressive crystalloid resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Some recent studies have shown that...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330707 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.161664 |
_version_ | 1782386342442827776 |
---|---|
author | Chatrath, Veena Khetarpal, Ranjana Ahuja, Jogesh |
author_facet | Chatrath, Veena Khetarpal, Ranjana Ahuja, Jogesh |
author_sort | Chatrath, Veena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, and almost 30% of trauma deaths are due to blood loss. A number of concerns have been raised regarding the advisability of the classic principles of aggressive crystalloid resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Some recent studies have shown that early volume restoration in certain types of trauma before definite hemostasis may result in accelerated blood loss, hypothermia, and dilutional coagulopathy. This review discusses the advances and changes in protocols in fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion for treatment of traumatic hemorrhage shock. The concept of low volume fluid resuscitation also known as permissive hypotension avoids the adverse effects of early aggressive resuscitation while maintaining a level of tissue perfusion that although lower than normal, is adequate for short periods. Permissive hypotension is part of the damage control resuscitation strategy, which targets the conditions that exacerbate hemorrhage. The elements of this strategy are permissive hypotension, minimization of crystalloid resuscitation, control of hypothermia, prevention of acidosis, and early use of blood products to minimize coagulopathy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4541175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45411752015-09-01 Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach Chatrath, Veena Khetarpal, Ranjana Ahuja, Jogesh J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Review Article Trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, and almost 30% of trauma deaths are due to blood loss. A number of concerns have been raised regarding the advisability of the classic principles of aggressive crystalloid resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Some recent studies have shown that early volume restoration in certain types of trauma before definite hemostasis may result in accelerated blood loss, hypothermia, and dilutional coagulopathy. This review discusses the advances and changes in protocols in fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion for treatment of traumatic hemorrhage shock. The concept of low volume fluid resuscitation also known as permissive hypotension avoids the adverse effects of early aggressive resuscitation while maintaining a level of tissue perfusion that although lower than normal, is adequate for short periods. Permissive hypotension is part of the damage control resuscitation strategy, which targets the conditions that exacerbate hemorrhage. The elements of this strategy are permissive hypotension, minimization of crystalloid resuscitation, control of hypothermia, prevention of acidosis, and early use of blood products to minimize coagulopathy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4541175/ /pubmed/26330707 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.161664 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chatrath, Veena Khetarpal, Ranjana Ahuja, Jogesh Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach |
title | Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach |
title_full | Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach |
title_fullStr | Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach |
title_short | Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach |
title_sort | fluid management in patients with trauma: restrictive versus liberal approach |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330707 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.161664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chatrathveena fluidmanagementinpatientswithtraumarestrictiveversusliberalapproach AT khetarpalranjana fluidmanagementinpatientswithtraumarestrictiveversusliberalapproach AT ahujajogesh fluidmanagementinpatientswithtraumarestrictiveversusliberalapproach |