Cargando…
A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation
Biochemical markers have a central position in the diagnosis and management of patients in clinical medicine, and also in clinical research and drug development, also for brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is frequently used for measurement of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26347708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00179 |
_version_ | 1782386368778862592 |
---|---|
author | Andreasson, Ulf Perret-Liaudet, Armand van Waalwijk van Doorn, Linda J. C. Blennow, Kaj Chiasserini, Davide Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Fladby, Tormod Genc, Sermin Kruse, Niels Kuiperij, H. Bea Kulic, Luka Lewczuk, Piotr Mollenhauer, Brit Mroczko, Barbara Parnetti, Lucilla Vanmechelen, Eugeen Verbeek, Marcel M. Winblad, Bengt Zetterberg, Henrik Koel-Simmelink, Marleen Teunissen, Charlotte E. |
author_facet | Andreasson, Ulf Perret-Liaudet, Armand van Waalwijk van Doorn, Linda J. C. Blennow, Kaj Chiasserini, Davide Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Fladby, Tormod Genc, Sermin Kruse, Niels Kuiperij, H. Bea Kulic, Luka Lewczuk, Piotr Mollenhauer, Brit Mroczko, Barbara Parnetti, Lucilla Vanmechelen, Eugeen Verbeek, Marcel M. Winblad, Bengt Zetterberg, Henrik Koel-Simmelink, Marleen Teunissen, Charlotte E. |
author_sort | Andreasson, Ulf |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biochemical markers have a central position in the diagnosis and management of patients in clinical medicine, and also in clinical research and drug development, also for brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is frequently used for measurement of low-abundance biomarkers. However, the quality of ELISA methods varies, which may introduce both systematic and random errors. This urges the need for more rigorous control of assay performance, regardless of its use in a research setting, in clinical routine, or drug development. The aim of a method validation is to present objective evidence that a method fulfills the requirements for its intended use. Although much has been published on which parameters to investigate in a method validation, less is available on a detailed level on how to perform the corresponding experiments. To remedy this, standard operating procedures (SOPs) with step-by-step instructions for a number of different validation parameters is included in the present work together with a validation report template, which allow for a well-ordered presentation of the results. Even though the SOPs were developed with the intended use for immunochemical methods and to be used for multicenter evaluations, most of them are generic and can be used for other technologies as well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4541289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45412892015-09-07 A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation Andreasson, Ulf Perret-Liaudet, Armand van Waalwijk van Doorn, Linda J. C. Blennow, Kaj Chiasserini, Davide Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Fladby, Tormod Genc, Sermin Kruse, Niels Kuiperij, H. Bea Kulic, Luka Lewczuk, Piotr Mollenhauer, Brit Mroczko, Barbara Parnetti, Lucilla Vanmechelen, Eugeen Verbeek, Marcel M. Winblad, Bengt Zetterberg, Henrik Koel-Simmelink, Marleen Teunissen, Charlotte E. Front Neurol Neuroscience Biochemical markers have a central position in the diagnosis and management of patients in clinical medicine, and also in clinical research and drug development, also for brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is frequently used for measurement of low-abundance biomarkers. However, the quality of ELISA methods varies, which may introduce both systematic and random errors. This urges the need for more rigorous control of assay performance, regardless of its use in a research setting, in clinical routine, or drug development. The aim of a method validation is to present objective evidence that a method fulfills the requirements for its intended use. Although much has been published on which parameters to investigate in a method validation, less is available on a detailed level on how to perform the corresponding experiments. To remedy this, standard operating procedures (SOPs) with step-by-step instructions for a number of different validation parameters is included in the present work together with a validation report template, which allow for a well-ordered presentation of the results. Even though the SOPs were developed with the intended use for immunochemical methods and to be used for multicenter evaluations, most of them are generic and can be used for other technologies as well. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4541289/ /pubmed/26347708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00179 Text en Copyright © 2015 Andreasson, Perret-Liaudet, van Waalwijk van Doorn, Blennow, Chiasserini, Engelborghs, Fladby, Genc, Kruse, Kuiperij, Kulic, Lewczuk, Mollenhauer, Mroczko, Parnetti, Vanmechelen, Verbeek, Winblad, Zetterberg, Koel-Simmelink and Teunissen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Andreasson, Ulf Perret-Liaudet, Armand van Waalwijk van Doorn, Linda J. C. Blennow, Kaj Chiasserini, Davide Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Fladby, Tormod Genc, Sermin Kruse, Niels Kuiperij, H. Bea Kulic, Luka Lewczuk, Piotr Mollenhauer, Brit Mroczko, Barbara Parnetti, Lucilla Vanmechelen, Eugeen Verbeek, Marcel M. Winblad, Bengt Zetterberg, Henrik Koel-Simmelink, Marleen Teunissen, Charlotte E. A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation |
title | A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation |
title_full | A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation |
title_fullStr | A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation |
title_short | A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation |
title_sort | practical guide to immunoassay method validation |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26347708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreassonulf apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT perretliaudetarmand apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT vanwaalwijkvandoornlindajc apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT blennowkaj apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT chiasserinidavide apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT engelborghssebastiaan apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT fladbytormod apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT gencsermin apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT kruseniels apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT kuiperijhbea apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT kulicluka apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT lewczukpiotr apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT mollenhauerbrit apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT mroczkobarbara apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT parnettilucilla apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT vanmecheleneugeen apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT verbeekmarcelm apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT winbladbengt apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT zetterberghenrik apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT koelsimmelinkmarleen apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT teunissencharlottee apracticalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT andreassonulf practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT perretliaudetarmand practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT vanwaalwijkvandoornlindajc practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT blennowkaj practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT chiasserinidavide practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT engelborghssebastiaan practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT fladbytormod practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT gencsermin practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT kruseniels practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT kuiperijhbea practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT kulicluka practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT lewczukpiotr practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT mollenhauerbrit practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT mroczkobarbara practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT parnettilucilla practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT vanmecheleneugeen practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT verbeekmarcelm practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT winbladbengt practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT zetterberghenrik practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT koelsimmelinkmarleen practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation AT teunissencharlottee practicalguidetoimmunoassaymethodvalidation |