Cargando…

A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms

To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scorza, A, Conforto, S, D'Anna, C, Sciuto, S.A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312078
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010164
_version_ 1782386379197513728
author Scorza, A
Conforto, S
D'Anna, C
Sciuto, S.A
author_facet Scorza, A
Conforto, S
D'Anna, C
Sciuto, S.A
author_sort Scorza, A
collection PubMed
description To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator’s visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent; (c) Field of View settings must be taken into account for measurement reproducibility as well as Dynamic Range compression and phantom attenuation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4541336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45413362015-08-26 A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms Scorza, A Conforto, S D'Anna, C Sciuto, S.A Open Biomed Eng J Article To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator’s visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent; (c) Field of View settings must be taken into account for measurement reproducibility as well as Dynamic Range compression and phantom attenuation. Bentham Open 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4541336/ /pubmed/26312078 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010164 Text en © Scorza et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Scorza, A
Conforto, S
D'Anna, C
Sciuto, S.A
A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms
title A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms
title_full A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms
title_short A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms
title_sort comparative study on the influence of probe placement on quality assurance measurements in b-mode ultrasound by means of ultrasound phantoms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312078
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010164
work_keys_str_mv AT scorzaa acomparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms
AT confortos acomparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms
AT dannac acomparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms
AT sciutosa acomparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms
AT scorzaa comparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms
AT confortos comparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms
AT dannac comparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms
AT sciutosa comparativestudyontheinfluenceofprobeplacementonqualityassurancemeasurementsinbmodeultrasoundbymeansofultrasoundphantoms