Cargando…

One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails

We present a new classification for the genus Conus sensu lato (family Conidae), based on molecular phylogenetic analyses of 329 species. This classification departs from both the traditional classification in only one genus and from a recently proposed shell- and radula-based classification scheme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puillandre, N., Duda, T. F., Meyer, C., Olivera, B. M., Bouchet, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyu055
_version_ 1782386393269403648
author Puillandre, N.
Duda, T. F.
Meyer, C.
Olivera, B. M.
Bouchet, P.
author_facet Puillandre, N.
Duda, T. F.
Meyer, C.
Olivera, B. M.
Bouchet, P.
author_sort Puillandre, N.
collection PubMed
description We present a new classification for the genus Conus sensu lato (family Conidae), based on molecular phylogenetic analyses of 329 species. This classification departs from both the traditional classification in only one genus and from a recently proposed shell- and radula-based classification scheme that separates members of this group into five families and 115 genera. Roughly 140 genus-group names are available for Recent cone snails. We propose to place all cone snails within a single family (Conidae) containing four genera—Conus, Conasprella, Profundiconus and Californiconus (with Conus alone encompassing about 85% of known species)—based on the clear separation of cone snails into four distinct and well-supported groups/lineages in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Within Conus and Conasprella, we recognize 57 and 11 subgenera, respectively, that represent well-supported subgroupings within these genera, which we interpret as evidence of intrageneric distinctiveness. We allocate the 803 Recent species of Conidae listed as valid in the World Register of Marine Species into these four genera and 71 subgenera, with an estimate of the confidence for placement of species in these taxonomic categories based on whether molecular or radula and/or shell data were used in these determinations. Our proposed classification effectively departs from previous schemes by (1) limiting the number of accepted genera, (2) retaining the majority of species within the genus Conus and (3) assigning members of these genera to species groups/subgenera to enable the effective communication of these groups, all of which we hope will encourage acceptance of this scheme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4541476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45414762015-09-05 One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails Puillandre, N. Duda, T. F. Meyer, C. Olivera, B. M. Bouchet, P. J Molluscan Stud Featured Article We present a new classification for the genus Conus sensu lato (family Conidae), based on molecular phylogenetic analyses of 329 species. This classification departs from both the traditional classification in only one genus and from a recently proposed shell- and radula-based classification scheme that separates members of this group into five families and 115 genera. Roughly 140 genus-group names are available for Recent cone snails. We propose to place all cone snails within a single family (Conidae) containing four genera—Conus, Conasprella, Profundiconus and Californiconus (with Conus alone encompassing about 85% of known species)—based on the clear separation of cone snails into four distinct and well-supported groups/lineages in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Within Conus and Conasprella, we recognize 57 and 11 subgenera, respectively, that represent well-supported subgroupings within these genera, which we interpret as evidence of intrageneric distinctiveness. We allocate the 803 Recent species of Conidae listed as valid in the World Register of Marine Species into these four genera and 71 subgenera, with an estimate of the confidence for placement of species in these taxonomic categories based on whether molecular or radula and/or shell data were used in these determinations. Our proposed classification effectively departs from previous schemes by (1) limiting the number of accepted genera, (2) retaining the majority of species within the genus Conus and (3) assigning members of these genera to species groups/subgenera to enable the effective communication of these groups, all of which we hope will encourage acceptance of this scheme. Oxford University Press 2015-02 2014-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4541476/ /pubmed/26300576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyu055 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Malacological Society of London, all rights reserved
spellingShingle Featured Article
Puillandre, N.
Duda, T. F.
Meyer, C.
Olivera, B. M.
Bouchet, P.
One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails
title One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails
title_full One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails
title_fullStr One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails
title_full_unstemmed One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails
title_short One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails
title_sort one, four or 100 genera? a new classification of the cone snails
topic Featured Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyu055
work_keys_str_mv AT puillandren onefouror100generaanewclassificationoftheconesnails
AT dudatf onefouror100generaanewclassificationoftheconesnails
AT meyerc onefouror100generaanewclassificationoftheconesnails
AT oliverabm onefouror100generaanewclassificationoftheconesnails
AT bouchetp onefouror100generaanewclassificationoftheconesnails