Cargando…

Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Haemostatic impairment can have a crucial impact on the outcome of emergency patients, especially in cases of concomitant antithrombotic drug treatment. In this prospective observational study we used a point of care (POC) coagulometer in a prehospital physician-based emergency medical s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beynon, Christopher, Erk, Angelina G., Potzy, Anna, Mohr, Stefan, Popp, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26260487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0139-6
_version_ 1782386485165555712
author Beynon, Christopher
Erk, Angelina G.
Potzy, Anna
Mohr, Stefan
Popp, Erik
author_facet Beynon, Christopher
Erk, Angelina G.
Potzy, Anna
Mohr, Stefan
Popp, Erik
author_sort Beynon, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Haemostatic impairment can have a crucial impact on the outcome of emergency patients, especially in cases of concomitant antithrombotic drug treatment. In this prospective observational study we used a point of care (POC) coagulometer in a prehospital physician-based emergency medical system in order to test its validity and potential value in the treatment of emergency patients. METHODS: During a study period of 12 months, patients could be included if venous access was mandatory for further treatment. The POC device CoaguChek® was used to assess international normalized ratio (INR) after ambulance arrival at the scene. Results were compared with in-hospital central laboratory assessment of INR. The gain of time was analysed as well as the potential value of POC testing through a questionnaire completed by the responsible prehospital emergency physician. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in this study. POC INR results were highly correlated with results of conventional assessment of INR (Bland-Altman-bias: 0.014). Using a cutoff value of INR >1.3, the device’s sensitivity to detect coagulopathy was 100 % with a specificity of 98.7 %. The median gain of time was 69 min. Treating emergency physicians considered the value of prehospital POC INR testing ‘high’ in 9 % and ‘medium’ in 21 % of all patients. In patients with tracer diagnosis ‘neurology’, the value of prehospital INR assessment was considered ‘high’ or ‘medium’ (63 %) significantly more often than in patients with non-neurological tracer diagnoses (24 %). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of INR through a POC coagulometer is feasible in prehospital emergency care and provides valuable information on haemostatic parameters in patients. Questionnaire results suggest that POC INR testing may present a valuable technique in selected patients. Whether this information translates into an improved management of respective patients has to be evaluated in further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4542099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45420992015-08-21 Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study Beynon, Christopher Erk, Angelina G. Potzy, Anna Mohr, Stefan Popp, Erik Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Haemostatic impairment can have a crucial impact on the outcome of emergency patients, especially in cases of concomitant antithrombotic drug treatment. In this prospective observational study we used a point of care (POC) coagulometer in a prehospital physician-based emergency medical system in order to test its validity and potential value in the treatment of emergency patients. METHODS: During a study period of 12 months, patients could be included if venous access was mandatory for further treatment. The POC device CoaguChek® was used to assess international normalized ratio (INR) after ambulance arrival at the scene. Results were compared with in-hospital central laboratory assessment of INR. The gain of time was analysed as well as the potential value of POC testing through a questionnaire completed by the responsible prehospital emergency physician. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in this study. POC INR results were highly correlated with results of conventional assessment of INR (Bland-Altman-bias: 0.014). Using a cutoff value of INR >1.3, the device’s sensitivity to detect coagulopathy was 100 % with a specificity of 98.7 %. The median gain of time was 69 min. Treating emergency physicians considered the value of prehospital POC INR testing ‘high’ in 9 % and ‘medium’ in 21 % of all patients. In patients with tracer diagnosis ‘neurology’, the value of prehospital INR assessment was considered ‘high’ or ‘medium’ (63 %) significantly more often than in patients with non-neurological tracer diagnoses (24 %). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of INR through a POC coagulometer is feasible in prehospital emergency care and provides valuable information on haemostatic parameters in patients. Questionnaire results suggest that POC INR testing may present a valuable technique in selected patients. Whether this information translates into an improved management of respective patients has to be evaluated in further studies. BioMed Central 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4542099/ /pubmed/26260487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0139-6 Text en © Beynon et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Beynon, Christopher
Erk, Angelina G.
Potzy, Anna
Mohr, Stefan
Popp, Erik
Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study
title Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study
title_full Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study
title_fullStr Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study
title_short Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study
title_sort point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26260487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0139-6
work_keys_str_mv AT beynonchristopher pointofcarecoagulometryinprehospitalemergencycareanobservationalstudy
AT erkangelinag pointofcarecoagulometryinprehospitalemergencycareanobservationalstudy
AT potzyanna pointofcarecoagulometryinprehospitalemergencycareanobservationalstudy
AT mohrstefan pointofcarecoagulometryinprehospitalemergencycareanobservationalstudy
AT popperik pointofcarecoagulometryinprehospitalemergencycareanobservationalstudy