Cargando…

Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design

BACKGROUND: It is generally assumed that learning in context increases performance. This study investigates the relationship between the characteristics of a paper-patient context (relevance and familiarity), the mechanisms through which the cognitive dimension of context could improve learning (act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergman, Esther M., de Bruin, Anique B. H., Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M., Kooloos, Jan G. M., Puts, Ghita C. W. M., Leppink, Jimmie, Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A., van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0416-0
_version_ 1782386490263732224
author Bergman, Esther M.
de Bruin, Anique B. H.
Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M.
Kooloos, Jan G. M.
Puts, Ghita C. W. M.
Leppink, Jimmie
Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
author_facet Bergman, Esther M.
de Bruin, Anique B. H.
Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M.
Kooloos, Jan G. M.
Puts, Ghita C. W. M.
Leppink, Jimmie
Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
author_sort Bergman, Esther M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is generally assumed that learning in context increases performance. This study investigates the relationship between the characteristics of a paper-patient context (relevance and familiarity), the mechanisms through which the cognitive dimension of context could improve learning (activation of prior knowledge, elaboration and increasing retrieval cues), and test performance. METHODS: A total of 145 medical students completed a pretest of 40 questions, of which half were with a patient vignette. One week later, they studied musculoskeletal anatomy in the dissection room without a paper-patient context (control group) or with (ir)relevant-(un)familiar context (experimental groups), and completed a cognitive load scale. Following a short delay, the students completed a posttest. RESULTS: Surprisingly, our results show that students who studied in context did not perform better than students who studied without context. This finding may be explained by an interaction of the participants’ expertise level, the nature of anatomical knowledge and students’ approaches to learning. A relevant-familiar context only reduced the negative effect of learning the content in context. Our results suggest discouraging the introduction of an uncommon disease to illustrate a basic science concept. Higher self-perceived learning scores predict higher performance. Interestingly, students performed significantly better on the questions with context in both tests, possibly due to a ‘framing effect’. CONCLUSIONS: Since studies focusing on the physical and affective dimensions of context have also failed to find a positive influence of learning in a clinically relevant context, further research seems necessary to refine our theories around the role of context in learning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0416-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4542121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45421212015-08-21 Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design Bergman, Esther M. de Bruin, Anique B. H. Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M. Kooloos, Jan G. M. Puts, Ghita C. W. M. Leppink, Jimmie Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: It is generally assumed that learning in context increases performance. This study investigates the relationship between the characteristics of a paper-patient context (relevance and familiarity), the mechanisms through which the cognitive dimension of context could improve learning (activation of prior knowledge, elaboration and increasing retrieval cues), and test performance. METHODS: A total of 145 medical students completed a pretest of 40 questions, of which half were with a patient vignette. One week later, they studied musculoskeletal anatomy in the dissection room without a paper-patient context (control group) or with (ir)relevant-(un)familiar context (experimental groups), and completed a cognitive load scale. Following a short delay, the students completed a posttest. RESULTS: Surprisingly, our results show that students who studied in context did not perform better than students who studied without context. This finding may be explained by an interaction of the participants’ expertise level, the nature of anatomical knowledge and students’ approaches to learning. A relevant-familiar context only reduced the negative effect of learning the content in context. Our results suggest discouraging the introduction of an uncommon disease to illustrate a basic science concept. Higher self-perceived learning scores predict higher performance. Interestingly, students performed significantly better on the questions with context in both tests, possibly due to a ‘framing effect’. CONCLUSIONS: Since studies focusing on the physical and affective dimensions of context have also failed to find a positive influence of learning in a clinically relevant context, further research seems necessary to refine our theories around the role of context in learning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0416-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4542121/ /pubmed/26271797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0416-0 Text en © Bergman et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bergman, Esther M.
de Bruin, Anique B. H.
Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M.
Kooloos, Jan G. M.
Puts, Ghita C. W. M.
Leppink, Jimmie
Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design
title Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design
title_full Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design
title_fullStr Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design
title_full_unstemmed Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design
title_short Effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design
title_sort effects of learning content in context on knowledge acquisition and recall: a pretest-posttest control group design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0416-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bergmanestherm effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign
AT debruinaniquebh effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign
AT vorstenboschmarcatm effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign
AT kooloosjangm effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign
AT putsghitacwm effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign
AT leppinkjimmie effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign
AT scherpbieralbertjja effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign
AT vandervleutenceespm effectsoflearningcontentincontextonknowledgeacquisitionandrecallapretestposttestcontrolgroupdesign