Cargando…
Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that systematic reviews are used infrequently by physicians in clinical decision-making. One proposed solution is to create filtered resources so that information is validated and refined in order to be read quickly. Two shortened systematic review formats were develope...
Autores principales: | Perrier, Laure, Persaud, Nav, Thorpe, Kevin E., Straus, Sharon E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26276278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0303-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians
por: Perrier, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Yu, Catherine H., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision-making: protocol for a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision-making: a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A usability study of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians
por: Perrier, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2014)