Cargando…
An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
During microsatellite marker development, researchers must choose from a pool of possible primer pairs to further test in their species of interest. In many cases, the goal is maximizing detectable levels of genetic variation. To guide researchers and determine which markers are associated with high...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Botanical Society of America
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500025 |
_version_ | 1782386568650031104 |
---|---|
author | Merritt, Benjamin J. Culley, Theresa M. Avanesyan, Alina Stokes, Richard Brzyski, Jessica |
author_facet | Merritt, Benjamin J. Culley, Theresa M. Avanesyan, Alina Stokes, Richard Brzyski, Jessica |
author_sort | Merritt, Benjamin J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | During microsatellite marker development, researchers must choose from a pool of possible primer pairs to further test in their species of interest. In many cases, the goal is maximizing detectable levels of genetic variation. To guide researchers and determine which markers are associated with higher levels of genetic variation, we conducted a literature review based on 6782 genomic microsatellite markers published from 1997–2012. We examined relationships between heterozygosity (H(e) or H(o)) or allele number (A) with the following marker characteristics: repeat type, motif length, motif region, repeat frequency, and microsatellite size. Variation across taxonomic groups was also analyzed. There were significant differences between imperfect and perfect repeat types in A and H(e). Dinucleotide motifs exhibited significantly higher A, H(e), and H(o) than most other motifs. Repeat frequency and motif region were positively correlated with A, H(e), and H(o), but correlations with microsatellite size were minimal. Higher taxonomic groups were disproportionately represented in the literature and showed little consistency. In conclusion, researchers should carefully consider marker characteristics so they can be tailored to the desired application. If researchers aim to target high genetic variation, dinucleotide motif lengths with large repeat frequencies may be best. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4542939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Botanical Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45429392015-08-26 An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) Merritt, Benjamin J. Culley, Theresa M. Avanesyan, Alina Stokes, Richard Brzyski, Jessica Appl Plant Sci Review Article During microsatellite marker development, researchers must choose from a pool of possible primer pairs to further test in their species of interest. In many cases, the goal is maximizing detectable levels of genetic variation. To guide researchers and determine which markers are associated with higher levels of genetic variation, we conducted a literature review based on 6782 genomic microsatellite markers published from 1997–2012. We examined relationships between heterozygosity (H(e) or H(o)) or allele number (A) with the following marker characteristics: repeat type, motif length, motif region, repeat frequency, and microsatellite size. Variation across taxonomic groups was also analyzed. There were significant differences between imperfect and perfect repeat types in A and H(e). Dinucleotide motifs exhibited significantly higher A, H(e), and H(o) than most other motifs. Repeat frequency and motif region were positively correlated with A, H(e), and H(o), but correlations with microsatellite size were minimal. Higher taxonomic groups were disproportionately represented in the literature and showed little consistency. In conclusion, researchers should carefully consider marker characteristics so they can be tailored to the desired application. If researchers aim to target high genetic variation, dinucleotide motif lengths with large repeat frequencies may be best. Botanical Society of America 2015-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4542939/ /pubmed/26312192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500025 Text en © 2015 Merritt et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-SA). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Merritt, Benjamin J. Culley, Theresa M. Avanesyan, Alina Stokes, Richard Brzyski, Jessica An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) |
title | An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) |
title_full | An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) |
title_fullStr | An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) |
title_full_unstemmed | An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) |
title_short | An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) |
title_sort | empirical review: characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merrittbenjaminj anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT culleytheresam anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT avanesyanalina anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT stokesrichard anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT brzyskijessica anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT merrittbenjaminj empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT culleytheresam empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT avanesyanalina empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT stokesrichard empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 AT brzyskijessica empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1 |