Cargando…

An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)

During microsatellite marker development, researchers must choose from a pool of possible primer pairs to further test in their species of interest. In many cases, the goal is maximizing detectable levels of genetic variation. To guide researchers and determine which markers are associated with high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merritt, Benjamin J., Culley, Theresa M., Avanesyan, Alina, Stokes, Richard, Brzyski, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Botanical Society of America 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500025
_version_ 1782386568650031104
author Merritt, Benjamin J.
Culley, Theresa M.
Avanesyan, Alina
Stokes, Richard
Brzyski, Jessica
author_facet Merritt, Benjamin J.
Culley, Theresa M.
Avanesyan, Alina
Stokes, Richard
Brzyski, Jessica
author_sort Merritt, Benjamin J.
collection PubMed
description During microsatellite marker development, researchers must choose from a pool of possible primer pairs to further test in their species of interest. In many cases, the goal is maximizing detectable levels of genetic variation. To guide researchers and determine which markers are associated with higher levels of genetic variation, we conducted a literature review based on 6782 genomic microsatellite markers published from 1997–2012. We examined relationships between heterozygosity (H(e) or H(o)) or allele number (A) with the following marker characteristics: repeat type, motif length, motif region, repeat frequency, and microsatellite size. Variation across taxonomic groups was also analyzed. There were significant differences between imperfect and perfect repeat types in A and H(e). Dinucleotide motifs exhibited significantly higher A, H(e), and H(o) than most other motifs. Repeat frequency and motif region were positively correlated with A, H(e), and H(o), but correlations with microsatellite size were minimal. Higher taxonomic groups were disproportionately represented in the literature and showed little consistency. In conclusion, researchers should carefully consider marker characteristics so they can be tailored to the desired application. If researchers aim to target high genetic variation, dinucleotide motif lengths with large repeat frequencies may be best.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4542939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Botanical Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45429392015-08-26 An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1) Merritt, Benjamin J. Culley, Theresa M. Avanesyan, Alina Stokes, Richard Brzyski, Jessica Appl Plant Sci Review Article During microsatellite marker development, researchers must choose from a pool of possible primer pairs to further test in their species of interest. In many cases, the goal is maximizing detectable levels of genetic variation. To guide researchers and determine which markers are associated with higher levels of genetic variation, we conducted a literature review based on 6782 genomic microsatellite markers published from 1997–2012. We examined relationships between heterozygosity (H(e) or H(o)) or allele number (A) with the following marker characteristics: repeat type, motif length, motif region, repeat frequency, and microsatellite size. Variation across taxonomic groups was also analyzed. There were significant differences between imperfect and perfect repeat types in A and H(e). Dinucleotide motifs exhibited significantly higher A, H(e), and H(o) than most other motifs. Repeat frequency and motif region were positively correlated with A, H(e), and H(o), but correlations with microsatellite size were minimal. Higher taxonomic groups were disproportionately represented in the literature and showed little consistency. In conclusion, researchers should carefully consider marker characteristics so they can be tailored to the desired application. If researchers aim to target high genetic variation, dinucleotide motif lengths with large repeat frequencies may be best. Botanical Society of America 2015-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4542939/ /pubmed/26312192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500025 Text en © 2015 Merritt et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-SA).
spellingShingle Review Article
Merritt, Benjamin J.
Culley, Theresa M.
Avanesyan, Alina
Stokes, Richard
Brzyski, Jessica
An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
title An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
title_full An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
title_fullStr An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
title_full_unstemmed An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
title_short An empirical review: Characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
title_sort empirical review: characteristics of plant microsatellite markers that confer higher levels of genetic variation(1)
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4542939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500025
work_keys_str_mv AT merrittbenjaminj anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT culleytheresam anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT avanesyanalina anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT stokesrichard anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT brzyskijessica anempiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT merrittbenjaminj empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT culleytheresam empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT avanesyanalina empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT stokesrichard empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1
AT brzyskijessica empiricalreviewcharacteristicsofplantmicrosatellitemarkersthatconferhigherlevelsofgeneticvariation1