Cargando…

Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?

INTRODUCTION: National guidance states that all patients having emergency surgery should have a mortality risk assessment calculated on admission so that the ‘high risk’ patient can receive the appropriate seniority and level of care. We aimed to assess if peri-operative risk scoring tools could acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stonelake, Stephen, Thomson, Peter, Suggett, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4543083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2015.07.004
_version_ 1782386576065560576
author Stonelake, Stephen
Thomson, Peter
Suggett, Nigel
author_facet Stonelake, Stephen
Thomson, Peter
Suggett, Nigel
author_sort Stonelake, Stephen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: National guidance states that all patients having emergency surgery should have a mortality risk assessment calculated on admission so that the ‘high risk’ patient can receive the appropriate seniority and level of care. We aimed to assess if peri-operative risk scoring tools could accurately calculate mortality and morbidity risk. METHODS: Mortality risk scores for 86 consecutive emergency laparotomies, were calculated using pre-operative (ASA, Lee index) and post-operative (POSSUM, P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM) risk calculation tools. Morbidity risk scores were calculated using the POSSUM predicted morbidity and compared against actual morbidity according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. RESULTS: The actual mortality was 10.5%. The average predicted risk scores for all laparotomies were: ASA 26.5%, Lee Index 2.5%, POSSUM 29.5%, P-POSSUM 18.5%, CR-POSSUM 10.5%. Complications occurred following 67 laparotomies (78%). The majority (51%) of complications were classified as Clavien–Dindo grade 2–3 (non-life-threatening). Patients having a POSSUM morbidity risk of greater than 50% developed significantly more life-threatening complications (CD 4–5) compared with those who predicted less than or equal to 50% morbidity risk (P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: Pre-operative risk stratification remains a challenge because the Lee Index under-predicts and ASA over-predicts mortality risk. Post-operative risk scoring using the CR-POSSUM is more accurate and we suggest can be used to identify patients who require intensive care post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of accurate risk scoring tools that can be used on admission to hospital it is not possible to reliably audit the achievement of national standards of care for the ‘high-risk’ patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4543083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45430832015-10-14 Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used? Stonelake, Stephen Thomson, Peter Suggett, Nigel Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research INTRODUCTION: National guidance states that all patients having emergency surgery should have a mortality risk assessment calculated on admission so that the ‘high risk’ patient can receive the appropriate seniority and level of care. We aimed to assess if peri-operative risk scoring tools could accurately calculate mortality and morbidity risk. METHODS: Mortality risk scores for 86 consecutive emergency laparotomies, were calculated using pre-operative (ASA, Lee index) and post-operative (POSSUM, P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM) risk calculation tools. Morbidity risk scores were calculated using the POSSUM predicted morbidity and compared against actual morbidity according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. RESULTS: The actual mortality was 10.5%. The average predicted risk scores for all laparotomies were: ASA 26.5%, Lee Index 2.5%, POSSUM 29.5%, P-POSSUM 18.5%, CR-POSSUM 10.5%. Complications occurred following 67 laparotomies (78%). The majority (51%) of complications were classified as Clavien–Dindo grade 2–3 (non-life-threatening). Patients having a POSSUM morbidity risk of greater than 50% developed significantly more life-threatening complications (CD 4–5) compared with those who predicted less than or equal to 50% morbidity risk (P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: Pre-operative risk stratification remains a challenge because the Lee Index under-predicts and ASA over-predicts mortality risk. Post-operative risk scoring using the CR-POSSUM is more accurate and we suggest can be used to identify patients who require intensive care post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of accurate risk scoring tools that can be used on admission to hospital it is not possible to reliably audit the achievement of national standards of care for the ‘high-risk’ patient. Elsevier 2015-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4543083/ /pubmed/26468369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2015.07.004 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Stonelake, Stephen
Thomson, Peter
Suggett, Nigel
Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?
title Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?
title_full Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?
title_fullStr Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?
title_short Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used?
title_sort identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: which risk prediction model should be used?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4543083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2015.07.004
work_keys_str_mv AT stonelakestephen identificationofthehighriskemergencysurgicalpatientwhichriskpredictionmodelshouldbeused
AT thomsonpeter identificationofthehighriskemergencysurgicalpatientwhichriskpredictionmodelshouldbeused
AT suggettnigel identificationofthehighriskemergencysurgicalpatientwhichriskpredictionmodelshouldbeused