Cargando…

A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Hysterectomy is often part of pelvic organ prolapse repair. However, this may offer no benefit when compared to uterine preservation. We aimed to prospectively evaluate a minimally invasive bilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy using polypropylene mesh. We hypothesized that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jirschele, K., Seitz, M., Zhou, Y., Rosenblatt, P., Culligan, P., Sand, P.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer London 2014
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4544494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25394892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2564-x

Ejemplares similares

Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse
por: Wang, Kaiyue, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion
por: Achermann, Arnold P. P., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage III and Stage IV Uterovaginal and Vault Prolapse
por: Gupta, Pratiksha
Publicado: (2015)

Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol)
por: van IJsselmuiden, Mèlanie N, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus
por: Dietz, Viviane, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Prolapse Hysterectomy with Apical Fixation: A Retrospective Comparison over an 18 Year Period
por: Carlin, Greta Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Anatomical and functional outcomes after hysterectomy and bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for stage IV uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective case series
por: Kavvadias, Tilemachos, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Mesh–free Ventral Rectopexy for Women with Complete Rectal and Uterovaginal Prolapse
por: Tade, Adedayo O., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
por: Detollenaere, Renée J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Patient's preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: A discrete choice experiment
por: Schulten, Sascha F. M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A novel bilateral anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy technique for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via the vaginal route: a cohort study
por: Naumann, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Congenital Uterovaginal Prolapse Present at Birth
por: Hyginus, Ekwunife Okechukwu, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Congenital Uterovaginal Prolapse in a Newborn
por: Jijo, Zenebe Wolde, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Sacrospinous ligament suspension with transobturator mesh versus sacral colpopexy for genital prolapse
por: Juliato, Cássia R.T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes
por: van Oudheusden, Anique M.J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial
por: Schulten, Sascha F M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

1‐year outcome after treatment of uterovaginal prolapse with a 6‐point fixation mesh
por: Brandt, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study
por: Dietz, Viviane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Concurrent Occurrence of Uterovaginal and Rectal Prolapse: An Uncommon Presentation
por: Umeh, UA, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Laparoscopic uterovaginal prolapse surgery in the elderly: feasibility and outcomes
por: King, Samuel W., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse
por: Kachroo, Naveen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Gynecologists’ perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified Manchester
por: Enklaar, Rosa A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study)
por: Schulten, Sascha F. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments
por: Moore, Robert D., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cervical carcinoma in the setting of uterovaginal prolapse: comparing standard versus tailored management
por: Kahn, Ryan M, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison
por: Gopinath, Deepa, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse
por: Hickman, Lisa C., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial)
por: Detollenaere, Renée J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Uterovaginal prolapse in a primigravida presenting in active first stage of labor: a case report
por: Dabi, Bezza Kedida, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Serious Complications and Recurrence following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Correction of Apical Prolapse
por: De Gracia, Susie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Laparoscopic Pectopexy versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse
por: Brasoveanu, Simona, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A new technique for uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Laparoscopic rectus abdominis hysteropexy for uterine prolapse by comparing with traditional techniques
por: Li, Zijun, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Use of Tutomesh for a Tension-Free and Tridimensional Repair of Uterovaginal and Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Preliminary Report
por: Dodero, Danilo, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse in a patient affected by marfan syndrome: a case report
por: Campagna, G, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Rectal Prolapse Concomitant with Uterovaginal Prolapse Protects the Ileum from Necrosis in Transanal Ileum Evisceration through a Traumatic Tear on the Sigmoid Wall
por: Budipramana, Vicky Sumarki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Traditional Chinese medicine decreases the obstructive uropathy risk in uterovaginal prolapse: A nationwide population-based study
por: Chang, Yin-Jen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty versus Unilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse
por: Nyyssönen, Virva, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Anatomical and functional outcomes after bilateral sacrospinous colposuspension (BSC) for the treatment of female genital prolapse
por: Hosni, Wael, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of High Uterosacral and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension Surgeries for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women
por: Hajhashemi, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial
por: Martins, Sérgio Brasileiro, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_etnve5kjlpl5j8ik29sr62o9cr