Cargando…

Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors ranked highest in German pharmaceutical expenditure in 2011. Their most important application is the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective is to analyze cost per responder of TNF-α inhibitors for RA from the German Statutory Health Insurance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gissel, Christian, Repp, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4544564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23877487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1
_version_ 1782386689037041664
author Gissel, Christian
Repp, Holger
author_facet Gissel, Christian
Repp, Holger
author_sort Gissel, Christian
collection PubMed
description Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors ranked highest in German pharmaceutical expenditure in 2011. Their most important application is the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective is to analyze cost per responder of TNF-α inhibitors for RA from the German Statutory Health Insurance funds' perspective. We aim to conduct the analysis based on randomized comparative effectiveness studies of the relevant treatments for the German setting. For inclusion of effectiveness studies, we require results in terms of response rates as defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) or American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. We identify conventional triple therapy as the relevant comparator. We calculate cost per responder based on German direct medical costs. Direct clinical comparisons could be identified for both etanercept and infliximab compared to triple therapy. For infliximab, cost per responder was 216,392 euros for ACR50 and 432,784 euros for ACR70 responses. For etanercept, cost per ACR70 responder was 321,527 euros. Cost was lower for response defined by EULAR criteria, but data was only available for infliximab. Cost per responder is overestimated by 40 % due to inclusion of taxes and mandatory rebates in German drugs' list prices. Our analysis shows specific requirements for cost-effectiveness analysis in Germany. Cost per responder for TNF-α treatment in the German setting is more than double the cost estimated in a similar analysis for the USA, which measured against placebo. The difference in results shows the critical role of the correct comparator for a specific setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4544564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45445642015-08-25 Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany Gissel, Christian Repp, Holger Clin Rheumatol Brief Report Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors ranked highest in German pharmaceutical expenditure in 2011. Their most important application is the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective is to analyze cost per responder of TNF-α inhibitors for RA from the German Statutory Health Insurance funds' perspective. We aim to conduct the analysis based on randomized comparative effectiveness studies of the relevant treatments for the German setting. For inclusion of effectiveness studies, we require results in terms of response rates as defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) or American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. We identify conventional triple therapy as the relevant comparator. We calculate cost per responder based on German direct medical costs. Direct clinical comparisons could be identified for both etanercept and infliximab compared to triple therapy. For infliximab, cost per responder was 216,392 euros for ACR50 and 432,784 euros for ACR70 responses. For etanercept, cost per ACR70 responder was 321,527 euros. Cost was lower for response defined by EULAR criteria, but data was only available for infliximab. Cost per responder is overestimated by 40 % due to inclusion of taxes and mandatory rebates in German drugs' list prices. Our analysis shows specific requirements for cost-effectiveness analysis in Germany. Cost per responder for TNF-α treatment in the German setting is more than double the cost estimated in a similar analysis for the USA, which measured against placebo. The difference in results shows the critical role of the correct comparator for a specific setting. Springer London 2013-07-23 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4544564/ /pubmed/23877487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Gissel, Christian
Repp, Holger
Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany
title Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany
title_full Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany
title_fullStr Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany
title_short Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany
title_sort cost per responder of tnf-α therapies in germany
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4544564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23877487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gisselchristian costperresponderoftnfatherapiesingermany
AT reppholger costperresponderoftnfatherapiesingermany