Cargando…

The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior

Many behaviors require reliably generating sequences of motor activity while adapting the activity to incoming sensory information. This process has often been conceptually explained as either fully dependent on sensory input (a chain reflex) or fully independent of sensory input (an idealized centr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Kendrick M., Lyttle, David N., Gill, Jeffrey P., Cullins, Miranda J., McManus, Jeffrey M., Lu, Hui, Thomas, Peter J., Chiel, Hillel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4544651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25182251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-014-0519-3
_version_ 1782386700935233536
author Shaw, Kendrick M.
Lyttle, David N.
Gill, Jeffrey P.
Cullins, Miranda J.
McManus, Jeffrey M.
Lu, Hui
Thomas, Peter J.
Chiel, Hillel J.
author_facet Shaw, Kendrick M.
Lyttle, David N.
Gill, Jeffrey P.
Cullins, Miranda J.
McManus, Jeffrey M.
Lu, Hui
Thomas, Peter J.
Chiel, Hillel J.
author_sort Shaw, Kendrick M.
collection PubMed
description Many behaviors require reliably generating sequences of motor activity while adapting the activity to incoming sensory information. This process has often been conceptually explained as either fully dependent on sensory input (a chain reflex) or fully independent of sensory input (an idealized central pattern generator, or CPG), although the consensus of the field is that most neural pattern generators lie somewhere between these two extremes. Many mathematical models of neural pattern generators use limit cycles to generate the sequence of behaviors, but other models, such as a heteroclinic channel (an attracting chain of saddle points), have been suggested. To explore the range of intermediate behaviors between CPGs and chain reflexes, in this paper we describe a nominal model of swallowing in Aplysia californica. Depending upon the value of a single parameter, the model can transition from a generic limit cycle regime to a heteroclinic regime (where the trajectory slows as it passes near saddle points). We then study the behavior of the system in these two regimes and compare the behavior of the models with behavior recorded in the animal in vivo and in vitro. We show that while both pattern generators can generate similar behavior, the stable heteroclinic channel can better respond to changes in sensory input induced by load, and that the response matches the changes seen when a load is added in vivo. We then show that the underlying stable heteroclinic channel architecture exhibits dramatic slowing of activity when sensory and endogenous input is reduced, and show that similar slowing with removal of proprioception is seen in vitro. Finally, we show that the distributions of burst lengths seen in vivo are better matched by the distribution expected from a system operating in the heteroclinic regime than that expected from a generic limit cycle. These observations suggest that generic limit cycle models may fail to capture key aspects of Aplysia feeding behavior, and that alternative architectures such as heteroclinic channels may provide better descriptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4544651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45446512015-08-25 The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior Shaw, Kendrick M. Lyttle, David N. Gill, Jeffrey P. Cullins, Miranda J. McManus, Jeffrey M. Lu, Hui Thomas, Peter J. Chiel, Hillel J. J Comput Neurosci Article Many behaviors require reliably generating sequences of motor activity while adapting the activity to incoming sensory information. This process has often been conceptually explained as either fully dependent on sensory input (a chain reflex) or fully independent of sensory input (an idealized central pattern generator, or CPG), although the consensus of the field is that most neural pattern generators lie somewhere between these two extremes. Many mathematical models of neural pattern generators use limit cycles to generate the sequence of behaviors, but other models, such as a heteroclinic channel (an attracting chain of saddle points), have been suggested. To explore the range of intermediate behaviors between CPGs and chain reflexes, in this paper we describe a nominal model of swallowing in Aplysia californica. Depending upon the value of a single parameter, the model can transition from a generic limit cycle regime to a heteroclinic regime (where the trajectory slows as it passes near saddle points). We then study the behavior of the system in these two regimes and compare the behavior of the models with behavior recorded in the animal in vivo and in vitro. We show that while both pattern generators can generate similar behavior, the stable heteroclinic channel can better respond to changes in sensory input induced by load, and that the response matches the changes seen when a load is added in vivo. We then show that the underlying stable heteroclinic channel architecture exhibits dramatic slowing of activity when sensory and endogenous input is reduced, and show that similar slowing with removal of proprioception is seen in vitro. Finally, we show that the distributions of burst lengths seen in vivo are better matched by the distribution expected from a system operating in the heteroclinic regime than that expected from a generic limit cycle. These observations suggest that generic limit cycle models may fail to capture key aspects of Aplysia feeding behavior, and that alternative architectures such as heteroclinic channels may provide better descriptions. Springer US 2014-09-04 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4544651/ /pubmed/25182251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-014-0519-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2014
spellingShingle Article
Shaw, Kendrick M.
Lyttle, David N.
Gill, Jeffrey P.
Cullins, Miranda J.
McManus, Jeffrey M.
Lu, Hui
Thomas, Peter J.
Chiel, Hillel J.
The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior
title The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior
title_full The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior
title_fullStr The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior
title_full_unstemmed The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior
title_short The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior
title_sort significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4544651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25182251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-014-0519-3
work_keys_str_mv AT shawkendrickm thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT lyttledavidn thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT gilljeffreyp thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT cullinsmirandaj thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT mcmanusjeffreym thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT luhui thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT thomaspeterj thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT chielhillelj thesignificanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT shawkendrickm significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT lyttledavidn significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT gilljeffreyp significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT cullinsmirandaj significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT mcmanusjeffreym significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT luhui significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT thomaspeterj significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior
AT chielhillelj significanceofdynamicalarchitectureforadaptiveresponsestomechanicalloadsduringrhythmicbehavior