Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: A variety of psychological interventions to treat depressive disorders have been developed and are used in primary care. In a systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of psychological treatments grouped by theoretical background, intensity of contact with the health care professi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linde, Klaus, Rücker, Gerta, Sigterman, Kirsten, Jamil, Susanne, Meissner, Karin, Schneider, Antonius, Kriston, Levente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0314-x
_version_ 1782386741202649088
author Linde, Klaus
Rücker, Gerta
Sigterman, Kirsten
Jamil, Susanne
Meissner, Karin
Schneider, Antonius
Kriston, Levente
author_facet Linde, Klaus
Rücker, Gerta
Sigterman, Kirsten
Jamil, Susanne
Meissner, Karin
Schneider, Antonius
Kriston, Levente
author_sort Linde, Klaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A variety of psychological interventions to treat depressive disorders have been developed and are used in primary care. In a systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of psychological treatments grouped by theoretical background, intensity of contact with the health care professional, and delivery mode for depressed patients in this setting. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing a psychological treatment with usual care, placebo, another psychological treatment, pharmacotherapy, or a combination treatment in adult depressed primary care patients were identified by database searches up to December 2013. We performed both conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence. Outcome measures were response to treatment (primary outcome), remission of symptoms, post-treatment depression scores and study discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 37 studies with 7,024 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the psychological treatments investigated in at least 150 patients face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; OR 1.80; 95 % credible interval 1.35–2.39), face-to-face counselling and psychoeducation (1.65; 1.27–2.13), remote therapist lead CBT (1.87; 1.38–2.53), guided self-help CBT (1.68; 1.22–2.30) and no/minimal contact CBT (1.53; 1.07–2.17) were superior to usual care or placebo, but not face-to-face problem-solving therapy and face-to-face interpersonal therapy. There were no statistical differences between psychological treatments apart from face-to-face interpersonal psychotherapy being inferior to remote therapist-lead CBT (0.60; 0.37–0.95). Remote therapist-led (0.86; 0.21–3.67), guided self-help (0.93; 0.62–1.41) and no/minimal contact CBT (0.85; 0.54–1.36) had similar effects as face-to-face CBT. CONCLUSIONS: The limited available evidence precludes a sufficiently reliable assessment of the comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments in depressed primary care patients. Findings suggest that psychological interventions with a cognitive behavioral approach are promising, and primarily indirect evidence indicates that it applies also when they are delivered with a reduced number of therapist contacts or remotely. Systematic review registration: 01KG1012 at http://www.gesundheitsforschung-bmbf.de/de/2852.php ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0314-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4545315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45453152015-08-23 Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis Linde, Klaus Rücker, Gerta Sigterman, Kirsten Jamil, Susanne Meissner, Karin Schneider, Antonius Kriston, Levente BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: A variety of psychological interventions to treat depressive disorders have been developed and are used in primary care. In a systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of psychological treatments grouped by theoretical background, intensity of contact with the health care professional, and delivery mode for depressed patients in this setting. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing a psychological treatment with usual care, placebo, another psychological treatment, pharmacotherapy, or a combination treatment in adult depressed primary care patients were identified by database searches up to December 2013. We performed both conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence. Outcome measures were response to treatment (primary outcome), remission of symptoms, post-treatment depression scores and study discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 37 studies with 7,024 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the psychological treatments investigated in at least 150 patients face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; OR 1.80; 95 % credible interval 1.35–2.39), face-to-face counselling and psychoeducation (1.65; 1.27–2.13), remote therapist lead CBT (1.87; 1.38–2.53), guided self-help CBT (1.68; 1.22–2.30) and no/minimal contact CBT (1.53; 1.07–2.17) were superior to usual care or placebo, but not face-to-face problem-solving therapy and face-to-face interpersonal therapy. There were no statistical differences between psychological treatments apart from face-to-face interpersonal psychotherapy being inferior to remote therapist-lead CBT (0.60; 0.37–0.95). Remote therapist-led (0.86; 0.21–3.67), guided self-help (0.93; 0.62–1.41) and no/minimal contact CBT (0.85; 0.54–1.36) had similar effects as face-to-face CBT. CONCLUSIONS: The limited available evidence precludes a sufficiently reliable assessment of the comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments in depressed primary care patients. Findings suggest that psychological interventions with a cognitive behavioral approach are promising, and primarily indirect evidence indicates that it applies also when they are delivered with a reduced number of therapist contacts or remotely. Systematic review registration: 01KG1012 at http://www.gesundheitsforschung-bmbf.de/de/2852.php ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0314-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4545315/ /pubmed/26286590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0314-x Text en © Linde et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linde, Klaus
Rücker, Gerta
Sigterman, Kirsten
Jamil, Susanne
Meissner, Karin
Schneider, Antonius
Kriston, Levente
Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
title Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0314-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lindeklaus comparativeeffectivenessofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressivedisordersinprimarycarenetworkmetaanalysis
AT ruckergerta comparativeeffectivenessofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressivedisordersinprimarycarenetworkmetaanalysis
AT sigtermankirsten comparativeeffectivenessofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressivedisordersinprimarycarenetworkmetaanalysis
AT jamilsusanne comparativeeffectivenessofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressivedisordersinprimarycarenetworkmetaanalysis
AT meissnerkarin comparativeeffectivenessofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressivedisordersinprimarycarenetworkmetaanalysis
AT schneiderantonius comparativeeffectivenessofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressivedisordersinprimarycarenetworkmetaanalysis
AT kristonlevente comparativeeffectivenessofpsychologicaltreatmentsfordepressivedisordersinprimarycarenetworkmetaanalysis