Cargando…

24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather

BACKGROUND: Provision of shelter for horses kept on summer pasture is rarely considered in welfare guidelines, perhaps because the benefits of shelter in warm conditions are poorly documented scientifically. For cattle, shade is a valued resource during summer and can mitigate the adverse effects of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartmann, Elke, Hopkins, Richard J, von Brömssen, Claudia, Dahlborn, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26289447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0135-x
_version_ 1782386742867787776
author Hartmann, Elke
Hopkins, Richard J
von Brömssen, Claudia
Dahlborn, Kristina
author_facet Hartmann, Elke
Hopkins, Richard J
von Brömssen, Claudia
Dahlborn, Kristina
author_sort Hartmann, Elke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Provision of shelter for horses kept on summer pasture is rarely considered in welfare guidelines, perhaps because the benefits of shelter in warm conditions are poorly documented scientifically. For cattle, shade is a valued resource during summer and can mitigate the adverse effects of warm weather on well-being and performance. We found in a previous study that horses utilized shelters frequently in summer. A shelter with a roof and closed on three sides (shelter A) was preferred and can reduce insect pressure whereas a shelter with roof and open on three sides was not utilized. However, shelter A restricts the all-round view of a horse, which may be important for horses as flight animals. Therefore, we studied whether a shelter with roof, where only the upper half of the rear wall was closed (shelter B), would be utilized while maintaining insect protection properties and satisfying the horses’ sense for security. A third shelter was offered with walls but no roof (shelter C) to evaluate whether the roof itself is an important feature from the horse’s perspective. Eight Warmblood horses were tested each for 2 days, kept individually for 24 h in two paddocks with access to shelters A and B, or shelters A and C, respectively. Shelter use was recorded continuously during the night (1800–2400 h, 0200–0600 h) and the following day (0900–1600 h), and insect defensive behaviour (e.g., tail swish) in instantaneous scan samples at 5-min intervals during daytime. RESULTS: Seven horses used both shelters A and B, but when given the choice between shelters A and C, shelter C was scarcely visited. There was no difference in duration of shelter use between night (105.8 ± 53.6 min) and day (100.8 ± 53.8, P = 0.829). Daytime shelter use had a significant effect on insect defensive behaviours (P = 0.027). The probability of performing these behaviours was lowest when horses used shelter A compared to being outside (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Horses only utilized shelters with a roof whilst a shelter with roof and closed on three sides had the best potential to lower insect disturbance during daytime in summer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4545324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45453242015-08-23 24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather Hartmann, Elke Hopkins, Richard J von Brömssen, Claudia Dahlborn, Kristina Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: Provision of shelter for horses kept on summer pasture is rarely considered in welfare guidelines, perhaps because the benefits of shelter in warm conditions are poorly documented scientifically. For cattle, shade is a valued resource during summer and can mitigate the adverse effects of warm weather on well-being and performance. We found in a previous study that horses utilized shelters frequently in summer. A shelter with a roof and closed on three sides (shelter A) was preferred and can reduce insect pressure whereas a shelter with roof and open on three sides was not utilized. However, shelter A restricts the all-round view of a horse, which may be important for horses as flight animals. Therefore, we studied whether a shelter with roof, where only the upper half of the rear wall was closed (shelter B), would be utilized while maintaining insect protection properties and satisfying the horses’ sense for security. A third shelter was offered with walls but no roof (shelter C) to evaluate whether the roof itself is an important feature from the horse’s perspective. Eight Warmblood horses were tested each for 2 days, kept individually for 24 h in two paddocks with access to shelters A and B, or shelters A and C, respectively. Shelter use was recorded continuously during the night (1800–2400 h, 0200–0600 h) and the following day (0900–1600 h), and insect defensive behaviour (e.g., tail swish) in instantaneous scan samples at 5-min intervals during daytime. RESULTS: Seven horses used both shelters A and B, but when given the choice between shelters A and C, shelter C was scarcely visited. There was no difference in duration of shelter use between night (105.8 ± 53.6 min) and day (100.8 ± 53.8, P = 0.829). Daytime shelter use had a significant effect on insect defensive behaviours (P = 0.027). The probability of performing these behaviours was lowest when horses used shelter A compared to being outside (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Horses only utilized shelters with a roof whilst a shelter with roof and closed on three sides had the best potential to lower insect disturbance during daytime in summer. BioMed Central 2015-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4545324/ /pubmed/26289447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0135-x Text en © Hartmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hartmann, Elke
Hopkins, Richard J
von Brömssen, Claudia
Dahlborn, Kristina
24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather
title 24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather
title_full 24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather
title_fullStr 24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather
title_full_unstemmed 24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather
title_short 24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during Swedish summer weather
title_sort 24-h sheltering behaviour of individually kept horses during swedish summer weather
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26289447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0135-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmannelke 24hshelteringbehaviourofindividuallykepthorsesduringswedishsummerweather
AT hopkinsrichardj 24hshelteringbehaviourofindividuallykepthorsesduringswedishsummerweather
AT vonbromssenclaudia 24hshelteringbehaviourofindividuallykepthorsesduringswedishsummerweather
AT dahlbornkristina 24hshelteringbehaviourofindividuallykepthorsesduringswedishsummerweather