Cargando…
Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Umeclidinium (UMEC; long-acting muscarinic antagonist) plus vilanterol (VI; long-acting beta(2) agonist [LABA]) and the LABA/inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) are approved maintenance treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This 12-wee...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0092-1 |
_version_ | 1782386761692872704 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Dave Worsley, Sally Zhu, Chang-Qing Hardaker, Liz Church, Alison |
author_facet | Singh, Dave Worsley, Sally Zhu, Chang-Qing Hardaker, Liz Church, Alison |
author_sort | Singh, Dave |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Umeclidinium (UMEC; long-acting muscarinic antagonist) plus vilanterol (VI; long-acting beta(2) agonist [LABA]) and the LABA/inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) are approved maintenance treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This 12-week, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy study compared the efficacy and safety of these treatments in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe COPD with no exacerbations in the year prior to enrolment. METHODS: Patients (n = 717) were randomised 1:1 to once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg or twice-daily FP/SAL 500/50 mcg. Endpoints included 0–24 h weighted mean (wm) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (Day 84; primary), trough FEV(1) (Day 85; secondary), other lung function endpoints, symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and safety. RESULTS: Improvements with UMEC/VI versus FP/SAL were 0.080 L (95 % confidence interval: 0.046–0.113; wmFEV(1)) and 0.090 L (0.055–0.125; trough FEV(1)) (both p < 0.001). UMEC/VI statistically significantly improved all other lung function measures versus FP/SAL. Both treatments demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in symptoms (Transition Dyspnoea Index ≥1 unit) and QoL (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire Total score ≥4 unit decrease from baseline) over 12 weeks. The incidence of adverse events was 28 % (UMEC/VI) and 29 % (FP/SAL); nasopharyngitis and headache were most common. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg over 12 weeks resulted in significant and sustained improvements in lung function versus twice-daily FP/SAL 500/50 mcg in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and with no exacerbations in the year prior to enrolment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01822899 Registration date: March 28, 2013 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0092-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4545560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45455602015-08-23 Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial Singh, Dave Worsley, Sally Zhu, Chang-Qing Hardaker, Liz Church, Alison BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Umeclidinium (UMEC; long-acting muscarinic antagonist) plus vilanterol (VI; long-acting beta(2) agonist [LABA]) and the LABA/inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) are approved maintenance treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This 12-week, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy study compared the efficacy and safety of these treatments in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe COPD with no exacerbations in the year prior to enrolment. METHODS: Patients (n = 717) were randomised 1:1 to once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg or twice-daily FP/SAL 500/50 mcg. Endpoints included 0–24 h weighted mean (wm) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (Day 84; primary), trough FEV(1) (Day 85; secondary), other lung function endpoints, symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and safety. RESULTS: Improvements with UMEC/VI versus FP/SAL were 0.080 L (95 % confidence interval: 0.046–0.113; wmFEV(1)) and 0.090 L (0.055–0.125; trough FEV(1)) (both p < 0.001). UMEC/VI statistically significantly improved all other lung function measures versus FP/SAL. Both treatments demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in symptoms (Transition Dyspnoea Index ≥1 unit) and QoL (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire Total score ≥4 unit decrease from baseline) over 12 weeks. The incidence of adverse events was 28 % (UMEC/VI) and 29 % (FP/SAL); nasopharyngitis and headache were most common. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg over 12 weeks resulted in significant and sustained improvements in lung function versus twice-daily FP/SAL 500/50 mcg in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and with no exacerbations in the year prior to enrolment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01822899 Registration date: March 28, 2013 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0092-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4545560/ /pubmed/26286141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0092-1 Text en © Singh et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Singh, Dave Worsley, Sally Zhu, Chang-Qing Hardaker, Liz Church, Alison Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial |
title | Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial |
title_full | Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial |
title_short | Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial |
title_sort | umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in copd: a randomised trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0092-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhdave umeclidiniumvilanterolversusfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolincopdarandomisedtrial AT worsleysally umeclidiniumvilanterolversusfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolincopdarandomisedtrial AT zhuchangqing umeclidiniumvilanterolversusfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolincopdarandomisedtrial AT hardakerliz umeclidiniumvilanterolversusfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolincopdarandomisedtrial AT churchalison umeclidiniumvilanterolversusfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolincopdarandomisedtrial |