Cargando…
Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking
Explanations of aesthetic pleasure based on processing fluency have shown that ease-of-processing fosters liking. What is less clear, however, is how processing fluency arises. Does it arise from a relative comparison among the stimuli presented in the experiment? Or does it arise from a comparison...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135944 |
_version_ | 1782386764643565568 |
---|---|
author | Forster, Michael Gerger, Gernot Leder, Helmut |
author_facet | Forster, Michael Gerger, Gernot Leder, Helmut |
author_sort | Forster, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Explanations of aesthetic pleasure based on processing fluency have shown that ease-of-processing fosters liking. What is less clear, however, is how processing fluency arises. Does it arise from a relative comparison among the stimuli presented in the experiment? Or does it arise from a comparison to an internal reference or standard? To address these questions, we conducted two experiments in which two ease-of-processing manipulations were applied: either (1) within-participants, where relative comparisons among stimuli varying in processing ease were possible, or (2) between-participants, where no relative comparisons were possible. In total, 97 participants viewed simple line drawings with high or low visual clarity, presented at four different presentation durations, and rated for felt fluency, liking, and certainty. Our results show that the manipulation of visual clarity led to differences in felt fluency and certainty regardless of being manipulated within- or between-participants. However, liking ratings were only affected when ease-of-processing was manipulated within-participants. Thus, feelings of fluency do not depend on the nature of the reference. On the other hand, participants liked fluent stimuli more only when there were other stimuli varying in ease-of-processing. Thus, relative differences in fluency seem to be crucial for liking judgments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4545584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45455842015-09-01 Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking Forster, Michael Gerger, Gernot Leder, Helmut PLoS One Research Article Explanations of aesthetic pleasure based on processing fluency have shown that ease-of-processing fosters liking. What is less clear, however, is how processing fluency arises. Does it arise from a relative comparison among the stimuli presented in the experiment? Or does it arise from a comparison to an internal reference or standard? To address these questions, we conducted two experiments in which two ease-of-processing manipulations were applied: either (1) within-participants, where relative comparisons among stimuli varying in processing ease were possible, or (2) between-participants, where no relative comparisons were possible. In total, 97 participants viewed simple line drawings with high or low visual clarity, presented at four different presentation durations, and rated for felt fluency, liking, and certainty. Our results show that the manipulation of visual clarity led to differences in felt fluency and certainty regardless of being manipulated within- or between-participants. However, liking ratings were only affected when ease-of-processing was manipulated within-participants. Thus, feelings of fluency do not depend on the nature of the reference. On the other hand, participants liked fluent stimuli more only when there were other stimuli varying in ease-of-processing. Thus, relative differences in fluency seem to be crucial for liking judgments. Public Library of Science 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4545584/ /pubmed/26288314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135944 Text en © 2015 Forster et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Forster, Michael Gerger, Gernot Leder, Helmut Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking |
title | Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking |
title_full | Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking |
title_fullStr | Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking |
title_full_unstemmed | Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking |
title_short | Everything’s Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking |
title_sort | everything’s relative? relative differences in processing fluency and the effects on liking |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forstermichael everythingsrelativerelativedifferencesinprocessingfluencyandtheeffectsonliking AT gergergernot everythingsrelativerelativedifferencesinprocessingfluencyandtheeffectsonliking AT lederhelmut everythingsrelativerelativedifferencesinprocessingfluencyandtheeffectsonliking |