Cargando…
Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor function is degraded in patients after lower limb arthroplasty. Sensorimotor training is thought to improve sensorimotor skills, however, the optimal training stimulus with regard to volume, frequency, duration, and intensity is still unknown. The aim of this study, therefor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0644-9 |
_version_ | 1782386772191215616 |
---|---|
author | Pohl, Torsten Brauner, Torsten Wearing, Scott Stamer, Knut Horstmann, Thomas |
author_facet | Pohl, Torsten Brauner, Torsten Wearing, Scott Stamer, Knut Horstmann, Thomas |
author_sort | Pohl, Torsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor function is degraded in patients after lower limb arthroplasty. Sensorimotor training is thought to improve sensorimotor skills, however, the optimal training stimulus with regard to volume, frequency, duration, and intensity is still unknown. The aim of this study, therefore, was to firstly quantify the progression of sensorimotor function after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty and, as second step, to evaluate effects of different sensorimotor training volumes. METHODS: 58 in-patients during their rehabilitation after THA or TKA participated in this prospective cohort study. Sensorimotor function was assessed using a test battery including measures of stabilization capacity, static balance, proprioception, and gait, along with a self-reported pain and function. All participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups performing sensorimotor training two, four, or six times per week. Outcome measures were taken at three instances, at baseline (pre), after 1.5 weeks (mid) and at the conclusion of the 3 week program (post). RESULTS: All measurements showed significant improvements over time, with the exception of proprioception and static balance during quiet bipedal stance which showed no significant main effects for time or intervention. There was no significant effect of sensorimotor training volume on any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: We were able to quantify improvements in measures of dynamic, but not static, sensorimotor function during the initial three weeks of rehabilitation following TKA/THA. Although sensorimotor improvements were independent of the training volume applied in the current study, long-term effects of sensorimotor training volume need to be investigated to optimize training stimulus recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number: DRKS00007894 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4545701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45457012015-08-23 Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty Pohl, Torsten Brauner, Torsten Wearing, Scott Stamer, Knut Horstmann, Thomas BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor function is degraded in patients after lower limb arthroplasty. Sensorimotor training is thought to improve sensorimotor skills, however, the optimal training stimulus with regard to volume, frequency, duration, and intensity is still unknown. The aim of this study, therefore, was to firstly quantify the progression of sensorimotor function after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty and, as second step, to evaluate effects of different sensorimotor training volumes. METHODS: 58 in-patients during their rehabilitation after THA or TKA participated in this prospective cohort study. Sensorimotor function was assessed using a test battery including measures of stabilization capacity, static balance, proprioception, and gait, along with a self-reported pain and function. All participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups performing sensorimotor training two, four, or six times per week. Outcome measures were taken at three instances, at baseline (pre), after 1.5 weeks (mid) and at the conclusion of the 3 week program (post). RESULTS: All measurements showed significant improvements over time, with the exception of proprioception and static balance during quiet bipedal stance which showed no significant main effects for time or intervention. There was no significant effect of sensorimotor training volume on any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: We were able to quantify improvements in measures of dynamic, but not static, sensorimotor function during the initial three weeks of rehabilitation following TKA/THA. Although sensorimotor improvements were independent of the training volume applied in the current study, long-term effects of sensorimotor training volume need to be investigated to optimize training stimulus recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number: DRKS00007894 BioMed Central 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4545701/ /pubmed/26286593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0644-9 Text en © Pohl et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pohl, Torsten Brauner, Torsten Wearing, Scott Stamer, Knut Horstmann, Thomas Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty |
title | Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty |
title_full | Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty |
title_short | Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty |
title_sort | effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0644-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pohltorsten effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty AT braunertorsten effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty AT wearingscott effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty AT stamerknut effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty AT horstmannthomas effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty |