Cargando…

Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor function is degraded in patients after lower limb arthroplasty. Sensorimotor training is thought to improve sensorimotor skills, however, the optimal training stimulus with regard to volume, frequency, duration, and intensity is still unknown. The aim of this study, therefor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pohl, Torsten, Brauner, Torsten, Wearing, Scott, Stamer, Knut, Horstmann, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0644-9
_version_ 1782386772191215616
author Pohl, Torsten
Brauner, Torsten
Wearing, Scott
Stamer, Knut
Horstmann, Thomas
author_facet Pohl, Torsten
Brauner, Torsten
Wearing, Scott
Stamer, Knut
Horstmann, Thomas
author_sort Pohl, Torsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor function is degraded in patients after lower limb arthroplasty. Sensorimotor training is thought to improve sensorimotor skills, however, the optimal training stimulus with regard to volume, frequency, duration, and intensity is still unknown. The aim of this study, therefore, was to firstly quantify the progression of sensorimotor function after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty and, as second step, to evaluate effects of different sensorimotor training volumes. METHODS: 58 in-patients during their rehabilitation after THA or TKA participated in this prospective cohort study. Sensorimotor function was assessed using a test battery including measures of stabilization capacity, static balance, proprioception, and gait, along with a self-reported pain and function. All participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups performing sensorimotor training two, four, or six times per week. Outcome measures were taken at three instances, at baseline (pre), after 1.5 weeks (mid) and at the conclusion of the 3 week program (post). RESULTS: All measurements showed significant improvements over time, with the exception of proprioception and static balance during quiet bipedal stance which showed no significant main effects for time or intervention. There was no significant effect of sensorimotor training volume on any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: We were able to quantify improvements in measures of dynamic, but not static, sensorimotor function during the initial three weeks of rehabilitation following TKA/THA. Although sensorimotor improvements were independent of the training volume applied in the current study, long-term effects of sensorimotor training volume need to be investigated to optimize training stimulus recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number: DRKS00007894
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4545701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45457012015-08-23 Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty Pohl, Torsten Brauner, Torsten Wearing, Scott Stamer, Knut Horstmann, Thomas BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor function is degraded in patients after lower limb arthroplasty. Sensorimotor training is thought to improve sensorimotor skills, however, the optimal training stimulus with regard to volume, frequency, duration, and intensity is still unknown. The aim of this study, therefore, was to firstly quantify the progression of sensorimotor function after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty and, as second step, to evaluate effects of different sensorimotor training volumes. METHODS: 58 in-patients during their rehabilitation after THA or TKA participated in this prospective cohort study. Sensorimotor function was assessed using a test battery including measures of stabilization capacity, static balance, proprioception, and gait, along with a self-reported pain and function. All participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups performing sensorimotor training two, four, or six times per week. Outcome measures were taken at three instances, at baseline (pre), after 1.5 weeks (mid) and at the conclusion of the 3 week program (post). RESULTS: All measurements showed significant improvements over time, with the exception of proprioception and static balance during quiet bipedal stance which showed no significant main effects for time or intervention. There was no significant effect of sensorimotor training volume on any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: We were able to quantify improvements in measures of dynamic, but not static, sensorimotor function during the initial three weeks of rehabilitation following TKA/THA. Although sensorimotor improvements were independent of the training volume applied in the current study, long-term effects of sensorimotor training volume need to be investigated to optimize training stimulus recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number: DRKS00007894 BioMed Central 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4545701/ /pubmed/26286593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0644-9 Text en © Pohl et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pohl, Torsten
Brauner, Torsten
Wearing, Scott
Stamer, Knut
Horstmann, Thomas
Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
title Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
title_full Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
title_fullStr Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
title_short Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
title_sort effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0644-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pohltorsten effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty
AT braunertorsten effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty
AT wearingscott effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty
AT stamerknut effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty
AT horstmannthomas effectsofsensorimotortrainingvolumeonrecoveryofsensorimotorfunctioninpatientsfollowinglowerlimbarthroplasty