Cargando…

Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND: Women in sub-Saharan Africa are disproportionately affected by high rates of HIV, yet relatively few products exist for female-initiated HIV prevention. New antiretroviral (ARV)-based prevention options could present opportunities for women to expand their HIV prevention choices; however...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eakle, Robyn, Jarrett, Caitlin, Bourne, Adam, Stadler, Jonathan, Larson, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0096-1
_version_ 1782386773130739712
author Eakle, Robyn
Jarrett, Caitlin
Bourne, Adam
Stadler, Jonathan
Larson, Heidi
author_facet Eakle, Robyn
Jarrett, Caitlin
Bourne, Adam
Stadler, Jonathan
Larson, Heidi
author_sort Eakle, Robyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women in sub-Saharan Africa are disproportionately affected by high rates of HIV, yet relatively few products exist for female-initiated HIV prevention. New antiretroviral (ARV)-based prevention options could present opportunities for women to expand their HIV prevention choices; however, acceptability and adherence play a key role in the effectiveness of these products and implementation is still in early stages. To better understand which HIV prevention options might best serve women in sub-Saharan Africa, how and why, this review will explore qualitative evidence from clinical trials and implementation studies alike using a meta-ethnographic approach to synthesise data and interpret results. METHODS/DESIGN: This systematic review will use a meta-ethnographic approach to analyse qualitative data extracted from multiple studies featuring actual use of female-initiated technologies for HIV prevention. The search strategy will be applied in seven databases and papers will be selected using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review will closely follow the guidance set forth by preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Centre for Reviews Dissemination (CRD) where the guidance applies to qualitative data. Two reviewers will review all papers during the paper selection phase, with consultation from a third reviewer to confirm consensus. All papers included in the review will be read and analysed by two reviewers. The final analysis will be conducted by three primary reviewers with additional input from all other authors. DISCUSSION: With new HIV prevention technologies currently in early implementation phases and still more on the horizon, there is much to learn about how best these products may be delivered. A review such as this could help to inform the real-world implementation of the next wave of new HIV prevention technologies such as ARV-based oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4545706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45457062015-08-23 Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa Eakle, Robyn Jarrett, Caitlin Bourne, Adam Stadler, Jonathan Larson, Heidi Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Women in sub-Saharan Africa are disproportionately affected by high rates of HIV, yet relatively few products exist for female-initiated HIV prevention. New antiretroviral (ARV)-based prevention options could present opportunities for women to expand their HIV prevention choices; however, acceptability and adherence play a key role in the effectiveness of these products and implementation is still in early stages. To better understand which HIV prevention options might best serve women in sub-Saharan Africa, how and why, this review will explore qualitative evidence from clinical trials and implementation studies alike using a meta-ethnographic approach to synthesise data and interpret results. METHODS/DESIGN: This systematic review will use a meta-ethnographic approach to analyse qualitative data extracted from multiple studies featuring actual use of female-initiated technologies for HIV prevention. The search strategy will be applied in seven databases and papers will be selected using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review will closely follow the guidance set forth by preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Centre for Reviews Dissemination (CRD) where the guidance applies to qualitative data. Two reviewers will review all papers during the paper selection phase, with consultation from a third reviewer to confirm consensus. All papers included in the review will be read and analysed by two reviewers. The final analysis will be conducted by three primary reviewers with additional input from all other authors. DISCUSSION: With new HIV prevention technologies currently in early implementation phases and still more on the horizon, there is much to learn about how best these products may be delivered. A review such as this could help to inform the real-world implementation of the next wave of new HIV prevention technologies such as ARV-based oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). BioMed Central 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4545706/ /pubmed/26286506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0096-1 Text en © Eakle et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Eakle, Robyn
Jarrett, Caitlin
Bourne, Adam
Stadler, Jonathan
Larson, Heidi
Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa
title Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa
title_full Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa
title_fullStr Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa
title_short Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa
title_sort protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical hiv prevention technologies in sub-saharan africa
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26286506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0096-1
work_keys_str_mv AT eaklerobyn protocolforasystematicreviewunderstandingthemotivationsandbarrierstouptakeanduseoffemaleinitiatedprimarybiomedicalhivpreventiontechnologiesinsubsaharanafrica
AT jarrettcaitlin protocolforasystematicreviewunderstandingthemotivationsandbarrierstouptakeanduseoffemaleinitiatedprimarybiomedicalhivpreventiontechnologiesinsubsaharanafrica
AT bourneadam protocolforasystematicreviewunderstandingthemotivationsandbarrierstouptakeanduseoffemaleinitiatedprimarybiomedicalhivpreventiontechnologiesinsubsaharanafrica
AT stadlerjonathan protocolforasystematicreviewunderstandingthemotivationsandbarrierstouptakeanduseoffemaleinitiatedprimarybiomedicalhivpreventiontechnologiesinsubsaharanafrica
AT larsonheidi protocolforasystematicreviewunderstandingthemotivationsandbarrierstouptakeanduseoffemaleinitiatedprimarybiomedicalhivpreventiontechnologiesinsubsaharanafrica