Cargando…
PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields
BACKGROUND: Classification algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) images support computational treatment planning in radiotherapy. Common clinical practice is based on manual delineation and fixed or iterative threshold methods, the latter of which requires regression curves dependent on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0110-7 |
_version_ | 1782386778974453760 |
---|---|
author | Layer, Thomas Blaickner, Matthias Knäusl, Barbara Georg, Dietmar Neuwirth, Johannes Baum, Richard P Schuchardt, Christiane Wiessalla, Stefan Matz, Gerald |
author_facet | Layer, Thomas Blaickner, Matthias Knäusl, Barbara Georg, Dietmar Neuwirth, Johannes Baum, Richard P Schuchardt, Christiane Wiessalla, Stefan Matz, Gerald |
author_sort | Layer, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Classification algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) images support computational treatment planning in radiotherapy. Common clinical practice is based on manual delineation and fixed or iterative threshold methods, the latter of which requires regression curves dependent on many parameters. METHODS: An improved statistical approach using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is proposed to obtain initial estimates of a target volume, followed by a correction step based on a Markov random field (MRF) and a Gibbs distribution to account for dependencies among neighboring voxels. In order to evaluate the proposed algorithm, phantom measurements of spherical and non-spherical objects with the smallest diameter being 8 mm were performed at signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) between 2.06 and 9.39. Additionally (68)Ga-PET data from patients with lesions in the liver and lymph nodes were evaluated. RESULTS: The proposed algorithm produces stable results for different reconstruction algorithms and different lesion shapes. Furthermore, it outperforms all threshold methods regarding detection rate, determines the spheres’ volumes more accurately than fixed threshold methods, and produces similar values as iterative thresholding. In a comparison with other statistical approaches, the algorithm performs equally well for larger volumes and even shows improvements for small volumes and SBRs. The comparison with experts’ manual delineations on the clinical data shows the same qualitative behavior as for the phantom measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a generic probabilistic approach that does not require data measured beforehand is presented whose performance, robustness, and swiftness make it a feasible choice for PET segmentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4545759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45457592015-08-26 PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields Layer, Thomas Blaickner, Matthias Knäusl, Barbara Georg, Dietmar Neuwirth, Johannes Baum, Richard P Schuchardt, Christiane Wiessalla, Stefan Matz, Gerald EJNMMI Phys Research Article BACKGROUND: Classification algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) images support computational treatment planning in radiotherapy. Common clinical practice is based on manual delineation and fixed or iterative threshold methods, the latter of which requires regression curves dependent on many parameters. METHODS: An improved statistical approach using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is proposed to obtain initial estimates of a target volume, followed by a correction step based on a Markov random field (MRF) and a Gibbs distribution to account for dependencies among neighboring voxels. In order to evaluate the proposed algorithm, phantom measurements of spherical and non-spherical objects with the smallest diameter being 8 mm were performed at signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) between 2.06 and 9.39. Additionally (68)Ga-PET data from patients with lesions in the liver and lymph nodes were evaluated. RESULTS: The proposed algorithm produces stable results for different reconstruction algorithms and different lesion shapes. Furthermore, it outperforms all threshold methods regarding detection rate, determines the spheres’ volumes more accurately than fixed threshold methods, and produces similar values as iterative thresholding. In a comparison with other statistical approaches, the algorithm performs equally well for larger volumes and even shows improvements for small volumes and SBRs. The comparison with experts’ manual delineations on the clinical data shows the same qualitative behavior as for the phantom measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a generic probabilistic approach that does not require data measured beforehand is presented whose performance, robustness, and swiftness make it a feasible choice for PET segmentation. Springer International Publishing 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4545759/ /pubmed/26501811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0110-7 Text en © Layer et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Layer, Thomas Blaickner, Matthias Knäusl, Barbara Georg, Dietmar Neuwirth, Johannes Baum, Richard P Schuchardt, Christiane Wiessalla, Stefan Matz, Gerald PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields |
title | PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields |
title_full | PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields |
title_fullStr | PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields |
title_full_unstemmed | PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields |
title_short | PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields |
title_sort | pet image segmentation using a gaussian mixture model and markov random fields |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0110-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT layerthomas petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT blaicknermatthias petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT knauslbarbara petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT georgdietmar petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT neuwirthjohannes petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT baumrichardp petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT schuchardtchristiane petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT wiessallastefan petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields AT matzgerald petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields |