Cargando…

PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields

BACKGROUND: Classification algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) images support computational treatment planning in radiotherapy. Common clinical practice is based on manual delineation and fixed or iterative threshold methods, the latter of which requires regression curves dependent on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Layer, Thomas, Blaickner, Matthias, Knäusl, Barbara, Georg, Dietmar, Neuwirth, Johannes, Baum, Richard P, Schuchardt, Christiane, Wiessalla, Stefan, Matz, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0110-7
_version_ 1782386778974453760
author Layer, Thomas
Blaickner, Matthias
Knäusl, Barbara
Georg, Dietmar
Neuwirth, Johannes
Baum, Richard P
Schuchardt, Christiane
Wiessalla, Stefan
Matz, Gerald
author_facet Layer, Thomas
Blaickner, Matthias
Knäusl, Barbara
Georg, Dietmar
Neuwirth, Johannes
Baum, Richard P
Schuchardt, Christiane
Wiessalla, Stefan
Matz, Gerald
author_sort Layer, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Classification algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) images support computational treatment planning in radiotherapy. Common clinical practice is based on manual delineation and fixed or iterative threshold methods, the latter of which requires regression curves dependent on many parameters. METHODS: An improved statistical approach using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is proposed to obtain initial estimates of a target volume, followed by a correction step based on a Markov random field (MRF) and a Gibbs distribution to account for dependencies among neighboring voxels. In order to evaluate the proposed algorithm, phantom measurements of spherical and non-spherical objects with the smallest diameter being 8 mm were performed at signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) between 2.06 and 9.39. Additionally (68)Ga-PET data from patients with lesions in the liver and lymph nodes were evaluated. RESULTS: The proposed algorithm produces stable results for different reconstruction algorithms and different lesion shapes. Furthermore, it outperforms all threshold methods regarding detection rate, determines the spheres’ volumes more accurately than fixed threshold methods, and produces similar values as iterative thresholding. In a comparison with other statistical approaches, the algorithm performs equally well for larger volumes and even shows improvements for small volumes and SBRs. The comparison with experts’ manual delineations on the clinical data shows the same qualitative behavior as for the phantom measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a generic probabilistic approach that does not require data measured beforehand is presented whose performance, robustness, and swiftness make it a feasible choice for PET segmentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4545759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45457592015-08-26 PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields Layer, Thomas Blaickner, Matthias Knäusl, Barbara Georg, Dietmar Neuwirth, Johannes Baum, Richard P Schuchardt, Christiane Wiessalla, Stefan Matz, Gerald EJNMMI Phys Research Article BACKGROUND: Classification algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) images support computational treatment planning in radiotherapy. Common clinical practice is based on manual delineation and fixed or iterative threshold methods, the latter of which requires regression curves dependent on many parameters. METHODS: An improved statistical approach using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is proposed to obtain initial estimates of a target volume, followed by a correction step based on a Markov random field (MRF) and a Gibbs distribution to account for dependencies among neighboring voxels. In order to evaluate the proposed algorithm, phantom measurements of spherical and non-spherical objects with the smallest diameter being 8 mm were performed at signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) between 2.06 and 9.39. Additionally (68)Ga-PET data from patients with lesions in the liver and lymph nodes were evaluated. RESULTS: The proposed algorithm produces stable results for different reconstruction algorithms and different lesion shapes. Furthermore, it outperforms all threshold methods regarding detection rate, determines the spheres’ volumes more accurately than fixed threshold methods, and produces similar values as iterative thresholding. In a comparison with other statistical approaches, the algorithm performs equally well for larger volumes and even shows improvements for small volumes and SBRs. The comparison with experts’ manual delineations on the clinical data shows the same qualitative behavior as for the phantom measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a generic probabilistic approach that does not require data measured beforehand is presented whose performance, robustness, and swiftness make it a feasible choice for PET segmentation. Springer International Publishing 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4545759/ /pubmed/26501811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0110-7 Text en © Layer et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Layer, Thomas
Blaickner, Matthias
Knäusl, Barbara
Georg, Dietmar
Neuwirth, Johannes
Baum, Richard P
Schuchardt, Christiane
Wiessalla, Stefan
Matz, Gerald
PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields
title PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields
title_full PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields
title_fullStr PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields
title_full_unstemmed PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields
title_short PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields
title_sort pet image segmentation using a gaussian mixture model and markov random fields
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0110-7
work_keys_str_mv AT layerthomas petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT blaicknermatthias petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT knauslbarbara petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT georgdietmar petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT neuwirthjohannes petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT baumrichardp petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT schuchardtchristiane petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT wiessallastefan petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields
AT matzgerald petimagesegmentationusingagaussianmixturemodelandmarkovrandomfields