Cargando…

Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues

INTRODUCTION: Pathologists currently diagnose breast lesions through histologic assessment, which requires fixation and tissue preparation. The diagnostic criteria used to classify breast lesions are qualitative and subjective, and inter-observer discordance has been shown to be a significant challe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobbs, Jessica L., Mueller, Jenna L., Krishnamurthy, Savitri, Shin, Dongsuk, Kuerer, Henry, Yang, Wei, Ramanujam, Nirmala, Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0617-9
_version_ 1782386813332094976
author Dobbs, Jessica L.
Mueller, Jenna L.
Krishnamurthy, Savitri
Shin, Dongsuk
Kuerer, Henry
Yang, Wei
Ramanujam, Nirmala
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
author_facet Dobbs, Jessica L.
Mueller, Jenna L.
Krishnamurthy, Savitri
Shin, Dongsuk
Kuerer, Henry
Yang, Wei
Ramanujam, Nirmala
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
author_sort Dobbs, Jessica L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pathologists currently diagnose breast lesions through histologic assessment, which requires fixation and tissue preparation. The diagnostic criteria used to classify breast lesions are qualitative and subjective, and inter-observer discordance has been shown to be a significant challenge in the diagnosis of selected breast lesions, particularly for borderline proliferative lesions. Thus, there is an opportunity to develop tools to rapidly visualize and quantitatively interpret breast tissue morphology for a variety of clinical applications. METHODS: Toward this end, we acquired images of freshly excised breast tissue specimens from a total of 34 patients using confocal fluorescence microscopy and proflavine as a topical stain. We developed computerized algorithms to segment and quantify nuclear and ductal parameters that characterize breast architectural features. A total of 33 parameters were evaluated and used as input to develop a decision tree model to classify benign and malignant breast tissue. Benign features were classified in tissue specimens acquired from 30 patients and malignant features were classified in specimens from 22 patients. RESULTS: The decision tree model that achieved the highest accuracy for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast features used the following parameters: standard deviation of inter-nuclear distance and number of duct lumens. The model achieved 81 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity, corresponding to an area under the curve of 0.93 and an overall accuracy of 90 %. The model classified IDC and DCIS with 92 % and 96 % accuracy, respectively. The cross-validated model achieved 75 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity and an overall accuracy of 88 %. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that proflavine staining and confocal fluorescence microscopy combined with image analysis strategies to segment morphological features could potentially be used to quantitatively diagnose freshly obtained breast tissue at the point of care without the need for tissue preparation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0617-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4545917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45459172015-08-23 Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues Dobbs, Jessica L. Mueller, Jenna L. Krishnamurthy, Savitri Shin, Dongsuk Kuerer, Henry Yang, Wei Ramanujam, Nirmala Richards-Kortum, Rebecca Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Pathologists currently diagnose breast lesions through histologic assessment, which requires fixation and tissue preparation. The diagnostic criteria used to classify breast lesions are qualitative and subjective, and inter-observer discordance has been shown to be a significant challenge in the diagnosis of selected breast lesions, particularly for borderline proliferative lesions. Thus, there is an opportunity to develop tools to rapidly visualize and quantitatively interpret breast tissue morphology for a variety of clinical applications. METHODS: Toward this end, we acquired images of freshly excised breast tissue specimens from a total of 34 patients using confocal fluorescence microscopy and proflavine as a topical stain. We developed computerized algorithms to segment and quantify nuclear and ductal parameters that characterize breast architectural features. A total of 33 parameters were evaluated and used as input to develop a decision tree model to classify benign and malignant breast tissue. Benign features were classified in tissue specimens acquired from 30 patients and malignant features were classified in specimens from 22 patients. RESULTS: The decision tree model that achieved the highest accuracy for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast features used the following parameters: standard deviation of inter-nuclear distance and number of duct lumens. The model achieved 81 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity, corresponding to an area under the curve of 0.93 and an overall accuracy of 90 %. The model classified IDC and DCIS with 92 % and 96 % accuracy, respectively. The cross-validated model achieved 75 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity and an overall accuracy of 88 %. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that proflavine staining and confocal fluorescence microscopy combined with image analysis strategies to segment morphological features could potentially be used to quantitatively diagnose freshly obtained breast tissue at the point of care without the need for tissue preparation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0617-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-20 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4545917/ /pubmed/26290094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0617-9 Text en © Dobbs et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dobbs, Jessica L.
Mueller, Jenna L.
Krishnamurthy, Savitri
Shin, Dongsuk
Kuerer, Henry
Yang, Wei
Ramanujam, Nirmala
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
title Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
title_full Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
title_fullStr Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
title_full_unstemmed Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
title_short Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
title_sort micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0617-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dobbsjessical microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues
AT muellerjennal microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues
AT krishnamurthysavitri microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues
AT shindongsuk microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues
AT kuererhenry microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues
AT yangwei microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues
AT ramanujamnirmala microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues
AT richardskortumrebecca microanatomicalquantitativeopticalimagingtowardautomatedassessmentofbreasttissues