Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) are associated with vancomycin treatment failure, and are becoming an increasing public health problem. Therefore, we undertook this study of 91 published studies and made subgroup comparisons of hVISA/VI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Shanshan, Sun, Xiaoxi, Chang, Wenjiao, Dai, Yuanyuan, Ma, Xiaoling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136082
_version_ 1782386832896425984
author Zhang, Shanshan
Sun, Xiaoxi
Chang, Wenjiao
Dai, Yuanyuan
Ma, Xiaoling
author_facet Zhang, Shanshan
Sun, Xiaoxi
Chang, Wenjiao
Dai, Yuanyuan
Ma, Xiaoling
author_sort Zhang, Shanshan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) are associated with vancomycin treatment failure, and are becoming an increasing public health problem. Therefore, we undertook this study of 91 published studies and made subgroup comparisons of hVISA/VISA incidence in different study years, locations, and types of clinical samples. We also analyzed the genetic backgrounds of these strains. METHODS: A systematic literature review of relevant articles published in PubMed and EMBASE from January 1997 to August 2014 was conducted. We selected and assessed journal articles reporting the prevalence rates of hVISA/VISA. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of hVISA was 6.05% in 99,042 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains and that of VISA was 3.01% in 68,792 MRSA strains. The prevalence of hVISA was 4.68% before 2006, 5.38% in 2006–2009, and 7.01% in 2010–2014. VISA prevalence was 2.05%, 2.63%, and 7.93%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis of different isolation locations, the prevalence of hVISA strains was 6.81% in Asia and 5.60% in Europe/America, and that of VISA was 3.42% and 2.75%, respectively. The frequencies of hVISA isolated from blood culture samples and from all clinical samples were 9.81% and 4.68%, respectively, and those of VISA were 2.00% and 3.07%, respectively. The most prevalent genotype was staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) II, which accounted for 48.16% and 37.74% of hVISA and VISA, respectively. Sequence Type (ST) 239 was most prevalent. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of hVISA/VISA has been increasing in recent years, but has been grossly underestimated. Its incidence is higher in Asia than in Europe/America. hVISA is isolated from blood culture samples more often than from other samples. These strains are highly prevalent in epidemic MRSA strains. This study clarifies the epidemiology of hVISA/VISA and indicates that the detection of these strains and the control of nosocomial infections must be strengthened.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4546009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45460092015-09-01 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Zhang, Shanshan Sun, Xiaoxi Chang, Wenjiao Dai, Yuanyuan Ma, Xiaoling PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) are associated with vancomycin treatment failure, and are becoming an increasing public health problem. Therefore, we undertook this study of 91 published studies and made subgroup comparisons of hVISA/VISA incidence in different study years, locations, and types of clinical samples. We also analyzed the genetic backgrounds of these strains. METHODS: A systematic literature review of relevant articles published in PubMed and EMBASE from January 1997 to August 2014 was conducted. We selected and assessed journal articles reporting the prevalence rates of hVISA/VISA. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of hVISA was 6.05% in 99,042 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains and that of VISA was 3.01% in 68,792 MRSA strains. The prevalence of hVISA was 4.68% before 2006, 5.38% in 2006–2009, and 7.01% in 2010–2014. VISA prevalence was 2.05%, 2.63%, and 7.93%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis of different isolation locations, the prevalence of hVISA strains was 6.81% in Asia and 5.60% in Europe/America, and that of VISA was 3.42% and 2.75%, respectively. The frequencies of hVISA isolated from blood culture samples and from all clinical samples were 9.81% and 4.68%, respectively, and those of VISA were 2.00% and 3.07%, respectively. The most prevalent genotype was staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) II, which accounted for 48.16% and 37.74% of hVISA and VISA, respectively. Sequence Type (ST) 239 was most prevalent. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of hVISA/VISA has been increasing in recent years, but has been grossly underestimated. Its incidence is higher in Asia than in Europe/America. hVISA is isolated from blood culture samples more often than from other samples. These strains are highly prevalent in epidemic MRSA strains. This study clarifies the epidemiology of hVISA/VISA and indicates that the detection of these strains and the control of nosocomial infections must be strengthened. Public Library of Science 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4546009/ /pubmed/26287490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136082 Text en © 2015 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Shanshan
Sun, Xiaoxi
Chang, Wenjiao
Dai, Yuanyuan
Ma, Xiaoling
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate staphylococcus aureus isolates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136082
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshanshan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheepidemiologyofvancomycinintermediateandheterogeneousvancomycinintermediatestaphylococcusaureusisolates
AT sunxiaoxi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheepidemiologyofvancomycinintermediateandheterogeneousvancomycinintermediatestaphylococcusaureusisolates
AT changwenjiao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheepidemiologyofvancomycinintermediateandheterogeneousvancomycinintermediatestaphylococcusaureusisolates
AT daiyuanyuan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheepidemiologyofvancomycinintermediateandheterogeneousvancomycinintermediatestaphylococcusaureusisolates
AT maxiaoling systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheepidemiologyofvancomycinintermediateandheterogeneousvancomycinintermediatestaphylococcusaureusisolates