Cargando…
Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale
BACKGROUND: Reducing health inequalities involves the identification and characterization of social and exposure factors and the way they accumulate in a given area. The areas of accumulation then allow for prioritization of interventions. The present study aims to build spatial composite indicators...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-015-0054-3 |
_version_ | 1782386870053765120 |
---|---|
author | Saib, Mahdi-Salim Caudeville, Julien Beauchamp, Maxime Carré, Florence Ganry, Olivier Trugeon, Alain Cicolella, Andre |
author_facet | Saib, Mahdi-Salim Caudeville, Julien Beauchamp, Maxime Carré, Florence Ganry, Olivier Trugeon, Alain Cicolella, Andre |
author_sort | Saib, Mahdi-Salim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reducing health inequalities involves the identification and characterization of social and exposure factors and the way they accumulate in a given area. The areas of accumulation then allow for prioritization of interventions. The present study aims to build spatial composite indicators based on the aggregation of environmental, social and health indicators and their inter-relationships. METHOD: Preliminary work was carried out firstly to homogenize spatial coverage, and secondly to study spatial variation of environmental (EI), socioeconomic (SI) and health (HI) indicators. The aggregation of the different indicators was performed using several methodologies for which results and decision-makers’ usability were compared. RESULTS: Four methodologies were tested: 1) A simple summation of normalized HI, EI and SI indicators (IC), 2) the sum of the normalized HI, EI and SI indicators weighted by the first principal component of a Principal Component Analysis (IC PCA), 3) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of Local Principal Component Analysis (IC LPCA), and 4) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of a Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis (IC GWPCA). CONCLUSION: The GWPCA is particularly adapted to taking into account the spatial heterogeneity and the spatial autocorrelation between SI, EI and HI. This approach invalidates the basic assumptions of many standard statistical analyses. Where socioeconomic indicators present high deprivation and where they are associated with potential modifiable health determinants, decision-makers can prioritize these areas for reducing inequalities by controlling the socioeconomic and health determinants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4546175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45461752015-08-23 Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale Saib, Mahdi-Salim Caudeville, Julien Beauchamp, Maxime Carré, Florence Ganry, Olivier Trugeon, Alain Cicolella, Andre Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: Reducing health inequalities involves the identification and characterization of social and exposure factors and the way they accumulate in a given area. The areas of accumulation then allow for prioritization of interventions. The present study aims to build spatial composite indicators based on the aggregation of environmental, social and health indicators and their inter-relationships. METHOD: Preliminary work was carried out firstly to homogenize spatial coverage, and secondly to study spatial variation of environmental (EI), socioeconomic (SI) and health (HI) indicators. The aggregation of the different indicators was performed using several methodologies for which results and decision-makers’ usability were compared. RESULTS: Four methodologies were tested: 1) A simple summation of normalized HI, EI and SI indicators (IC), 2) the sum of the normalized HI, EI and SI indicators weighted by the first principal component of a Principal Component Analysis (IC PCA), 3) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of Local Principal Component Analysis (IC LPCA), and 4) the sum of normalized and weighted indicators of the first principal component of a Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis (IC GWPCA). CONCLUSION: The GWPCA is particularly adapted to taking into account the spatial heterogeneity and the spatial autocorrelation between SI, EI and HI. This approach invalidates the basic assumptions of many standard statistical analyses. Where socioeconomic indicators present high deprivation and where they are associated with potential modifiable health determinants, decision-makers can prioritize these areas for reducing inequalities by controlling the socioeconomic and health determinants. BioMed Central 2015-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4546175/ /pubmed/26294093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-015-0054-3 Text en © Saib et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Saib, Mahdi-Salim Caudeville, Julien Beauchamp, Maxime Carré, Florence Ganry, Olivier Trugeon, Alain Cicolella, Andre Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale |
title | Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale |
title_full | Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale |
title_fullStr | Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale |
title_short | Building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale |
title_sort | building spatial composite indicators to analyze environmental health inequalities on a regional scale |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-015-0054-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saibmahdisalim buildingspatialcompositeindicatorstoanalyzeenvironmentalhealthinequalitiesonaregionalscale AT caudevillejulien buildingspatialcompositeindicatorstoanalyzeenvironmentalhealthinequalitiesonaregionalscale AT beauchampmaxime buildingspatialcompositeindicatorstoanalyzeenvironmentalhealthinequalitiesonaregionalscale AT carreflorence buildingspatialcompositeindicatorstoanalyzeenvironmentalhealthinequalitiesonaregionalscale AT ganryolivier buildingspatialcompositeindicatorstoanalyzeenvironmentalhealthinequalitiesonaregionalscale AT trugeonalain buildingspatialcompositeindicatorstoanalyzeenvironmentalhealthinequalitiesonaregionalscale AT cicolellaandre buildingspatialcompositeindicatorstoanalyzeenvironmentalhealthinequalitiesonaregionalscale |