Cargando…

Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the preliminary result of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT). METHODS: All the CPT cases with tibial shortening after initial union managed b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Guang-hui, Mei, Hai-bo, He, Rong-guo, Liu, Kun, Tang, Jin, Wu, Jiang-yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26293924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0680-5
_version_ 1782386871451516928
author Zhu, Guang-hui
Mei, Hai-bo
He, Rong-guo
Liu, Kun
Tang, Jin
Wu, Jiang-yan
author_facet Zhu, Guang-hui
Mei, Hai-bo
He, Rong-guo
Liu, Kun
Tang, Jin
Wu, Jiang-yan
author_sort Zhu, Guang-hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the preliminary result of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT). METHODS: All the CPT cases with tibial shortening after initial union managed by proximal tibial lengthening using Ilizarov technique were identified. All the patient charts and radiograms were reviewed. RESULTS: Between March 2007 and January 2012, 11 CPT cases were included with an average follow-up of 41 months (range, 34–51 months). The mean age at surgery was 8.5 years (range, 3.9–14.5y). The average length of discrepancy was 5.6 cm (range, 2.0–8.2 cm). Eight (8) cases had radiological findings of proximal tibial dysplasia, while the other 3 cases had not. The average distraction length gained was 5.3 cm (range, 3.5–8.0 cm) with a mean elongation rate of 21.4 % (range, 15–30 %). The Healing Index (HI) was 63.1 d/cm (range, 47–77 d/cm). In the 8 patients with proximal tibial dysplasia, 5 cases had lateral callus, 3 had central callus, and poor bone regeneration was observed in all of them with an average HI of 67 d/cm. In the other 3 patients without proximal tibial dysplasia, concave shaped callus was identified with an average HI of 52.7 d/cm. None of the patients had re-fracture, nonunion, axis deviation or angulation of the distraction area. Ankle joint stiffness was found in 2 of the patients. No evidence of knee contracture was detected. There were 5 cases with pin-tract infection which was managed by pin-tract nurse and oral administration of antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that proximal tibial lengthening after initial union of CPT was effective for management of tibial shortening, however it was characterized by poor bone regeneration with different types of callus from normal, greater healing index and prolonged fixator wearing. We recommended that tibial lengthening could be considered when the limb length discrepancy (LLD) was more than 4 cm in younger children after primary union of CPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4546181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45461812015-08-23 Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study Zhu, Guang-hui Mei, Hai-bo He, Rong-guo Liu, Kun Tang, Jin Wu, Jiang-yan BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the preliminary result of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT). METHODS: All the CPT cases with tibial shortening after initial union managed by proximal tibial lengthening using Ilizarov technique were identified. All the patient charts and radiograms were reviewed. RESULTS: Between March 2007 and January 2012, 11 CPT cases were included with an average follow-up of 41 months (range, 34–51 months). The mean age at surgery was 8.5 years (range, 3.9–14.5y). The average length of discrepancy was 5.6 cm (range, 2.0–8.2 cm). Eight (8) cases had radiological findings of proximal tibial dysplasia, while the other 3 cases had not. The average distraction length gained was 5.3 cm (range, 3.5–8.0 cm) with a mean elongation rate of 21.4 % (range, 15–30 %). The Healing Index (HI) was 63.1 d/cm (range, 47–77 d/cm). In the 8 patients with proximal tibial dysplasia, 5 cases had lateral callus, 3 had central callus, and poor bone regeneration was observed in all of them with an average HI of 67 d/cm. In the other 3 patients without proximal tibial dysplasia, concave shaped callus was identified with an average HI of 52.7 d/cm. None of the patients had re-fracture, nonunion, axis deviation or angulation of the distraction area. Ankle joint stiffness was found in 2 of the patients. No evidence of knee contracture was detected. There were 5 cases with pin-tract infection which was managed by pin-tract nurse and oral administration of antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that proximal tibial lengthening after initial union of CPT was effective for management of tibial shortening, however it was characterized by poor bone regeneration with different types of callus from normal, greater healing index and prolonged fixator wearing. We recommended that tibial lengthening could be considered when the limb length discrepancy (LLD) was more than 4 cm in younger children after primary union of CPT. BioMed Central 2015-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4546181/ /pubmed/26293924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0680-5 Text en © Zhu et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Guang-hui
Mei, Hai-bo
He, Rong-guo
Liu, Kun
Tang, Jin
Wu, Jiang-yan
Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study
title Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study
title_full Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study
title_fullStr Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study
title_short Effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT): a preliminary study
title_sort effect of distraction osteogenesis in patient with tibial shortening after initial union of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (cpt): a preliminary study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26293924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0680-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuguanghui effectofdistractionosteogenesisinpatientwithtibialshorteningafterinitialunionofcongenitalpseudarthrosisofthetibiacptapreliminarystudy
AT meihaibo effectofdistractionosteogenesisinpatientwithtibialshorteningafterinitialunionofcongenitalpseudarthrosisofthetibiacptapreliminarystudy
AT herongguo effectofdistractionosteogenesisinpatientwithtibialshorteningafterinitialunionofcongenitalpseudarthrosisofthetibiacptapreliminarystudy
AT liukun effectofdistractionosteogenesisinpatientwithtibialshorteningafterinitialunionofcongenitalpseudarthrosisofthetibiacptapreliminarystudy
AT tangjin effectofdistractionosteogenesisinpatientwithtibialshorteningafterinitialunionofcongenitalpseudarthrosisofthetibiacptapreliminarystudy
AT wujiangyan effectofdistractionosteogenesisinpatientwithtibialshorteningafterinitialunionofcongenitalpseudarthrosisofthetibiacptapreliminarystudy