Cargando…

Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Primary care clinicians often address multiple patient problems, with a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) which covers this range of outcomes. Consequently, many researchers use PROMs that do not capture the full impact of primary c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Mairead, Hollinghurst, Sandra, Turner, Katrina, Salisbury, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0323-9
_version_ 1782386876008628224
author Murphy, Mairead
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Turner, Katrina
Salisbury, Chris
author_facet Murphy, Mairead
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Turner, Katrina
Salisbury, Chris
author_sort Murphy, Mairead
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care clinicians often address multiple patient problems, with a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) which covers this range of outcomes. Consequently, many researchers use PROMs that do not capture the full impact of primary care services. In order to identify what outcomes a PROM for primary care would need to include, we conducted interviews with patients and practitioners. This paper reports these patient and practitioners’ views on the outcomes arising from primary care consultations. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were held with 30 patients and eight clinicians across five sites in Bristol. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. We used a broad definition of health outcome as ‘the impacts of healthcare on health, or a patient’s ability to impact health’ to identify outcomes through this process. RESULTS: 10 outcome groups were identified. These occupied 3 domains: Health Empowerment: These are the internal and external resources which enable patients to improve their health. This involves 1) patients’ understanding of their illnesses, 2) ability to self-care and stay healthy, 3) agreeing and adhering to a patient-clinician shared plan, 4) confidence in seeking healthcare and 5) access to support. Health Status: This involves 6) reduction of symptoms and 7) reducing the impact of symptoms on patients’ lives. Health Perceptions: This involves 8) patients’ satisfaction with their health, 9) health concerns, and 10) confidence in their future health. The structure, organisation and nature of primary care means it can affect all 3 domains. CONCLUSIONS: No existing PROM captures all these outcomes. For example, many health empowerment PROMs do not consider patient preference on empowerment. Many health status tools are not responsive to changes resulting from primary care. Health perceptions PROMs have generally been designed for measuring personality traits rather than outcomes. This study provides a platform for designing a new PROM containing outcomes that matter to patients and can be influenced by primary care. Such a PROM would greatly enhance the value of primary care research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0323-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4546201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45462012015-08-23 Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study Murphy, Mairead Hollinghurst, Sandra Turner, Katrina Salisbury, Chris BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care clinicians often address multiple patient problems, with a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) which covers this range of outcomes. Consequently, many researchers use PROMs that do not capture the full impact of primary care services. In order to identify what outcomes a PROM for primary care would need to include, we conducted interviews with patients and practitioners. This paper reports these patient and practitioners’ views on the outcomes arising from primary care consultations. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were held with 30 patients and eight clinicians across five sites in Bristol. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. We used a broad definition of health outcome as ‘the impacts of healthcare on health, or a patient’s ability to impact health’ to identify outcomes through this process. RESULTS: 10 outcome groups were identified. These occupied 3 domains: Health Empowerment: These are the internal and external resources which enable patients to improve their health. This involves 1) patients’ understanding of their illnesses, 2) ability to self-care and stay healthy, 3) agreeing and adhering to a patient-clinician shared plan, 4) confidence in seeking healthcare and 5) access to support. Health Status: This involves 6) reduction of symptoms and 7) reducing the impact of symptoms on patients’ lives. Health Perceptions: This involves 8) patients’ satisfaction with their health, 9) health concerns, and 10) confidence in their future health. The structure, organisation and nature of primary care means it can affect all 3 domains. CONCLUSIONS: No existing PROM captures all these outcomes. For example, many health empowerment PROMs do not consider patient preference on empowerment. Many health status tools are not responsive to changes resulting from primary care. Health perceptions PROMs have generally been designed for measuring personality traits rather than outcomes. This study provides a platform for designing a new PROM containing outcomes that matter to patients and can be influenced by primary care. Such a PROM would greatly enhance the value of primary care research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0323-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4546201/ /pubmed/26297232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0323-9 Text en © Murphy et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murphy, Mairead
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Turner, Katrina
Salisbury, Chris
Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
title Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
title_full Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
title_short Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
title_sort patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0323-9
work_keys_str_mv AT murphymairead patientandpractitionersviewsonthemostimportantoutcomesarisingfromprimarycareconsultationsaqualitativestudy
AT hollinghurstsandra patientandpractitionersviewsonthemostimportantoutcomesarisingfromprimarycareconsultationsaqualitativestudy
AT turnerkatrina patientandpractitionersviewsonthemostimportantoutcomesarisingfromprimarycareconsultationsaqualitativestudy
AT salisburychris patientandpractitionersviewsonthemostimportantoutcomesarisingfromprimarycareconsultationsaqualitativestudy