Cargando…

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)

BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets can increase the efficiency and value of research and, as a result, there are an increasing number of studies looking to develop core outcome sets (COS). However, the credibility of a COS depends on both the use of sound methodology in its development and clear and tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirkham, Jamie J., Gorst, Sarah, Altman, Douglas G., Blazeby, Jane, Clarke, Mike, Devane, Declan, Gargon, Elizabeth, Williamson, Paula R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0913-9
_version_ 1782386910915723264
author Kirkham, Jamie J.
Gorst, Sarah
Altman, Douglas G.
Blazeby, Jane
Clarke, Mike
Devane, Declan
Gargon, Elizabeth
Williamson, Paula R.
author_facet Kirkham, Jamie J.
Gorst, Sarah
Altman, Douglas G.
Blazeby, Jane
Clarke, Mike
Devane, Declan
Gargon, Elizabeth
Williamson, Paula R.
author_sort Kirkham, Jamie J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets can increase the efficiency and value of research and, as a result, there are an increasing number of studies looking to develop core outcome sets (COS). However, the credibility of a COS depends on both the use of sound methodology in its development and clear and transparent reporting of the processes adopted. To date there is no reporting guideline for reporting COS studies. The aim of this programme of research is to develop a reporting guideline for studies developing COS and to highlight some of the important methodological considerations in the process. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will include a reporting guideline item generation stage which will then be used in a Delphi study. The Delphi study is anticipated to include two rounds. The first round will ask stakeholders to score the items listed and to add any new items they think are relevant. In the second round of the process, participants will be shown the distribution of scores for all stakeholder groups separately and asked to re-score. A final consensus meeting will be held with an expert panel and stakeholder representatives to review the guideline item list. Following the consensus meeting, a reporting guideline will be drafted and review and testing will be undertaken until the guideline is finalised. The final outcome will be the COS-STAR (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting) guideline for studies developing COS and a supporting explanatory document. DISCUSSION: To assess the credibility and usefulness of a COS, readers of a COS development report need complete, clear and transparent information on its methodology and proposed core set of outcomes. The COS-STAR guideline will potentially benefit all stakeholders in COS development: COS developers, COS users, e.g. trialists and systematic reviewers, journal editors, policy-makers and patient groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4546355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45463552015-08-23 COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol) Kirkham, Jamie J. Gorst, Sarah Altman, Douglas G. Blazeby, Jane Clarke, Mike Devane, Declan Gargon, Elizabeth Williamson, Paula R. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets can increase the efficiency and value of research and, as a result, there are an increasing number of studies looking to develop core outcome sets (COS). However, the credibility of a COS depends on both the use of sound methodology in its development and clear and transparent reporting of the processes adopted. To date there is no reporting guideline for reporting COS studies. The aim of this programme of research is to develop a reporting guideline for studies developing COS and to highlight some of the important methodological considerations in the process. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will include a reporting guideline item generation stage which will then be used in a Delphi study. The Delphi study is anticipated to include two rounds. The first round will ask stakeholders to score the items listed and to add any new items they think are relevant. In the second round of the process, participants will be shown the distribution of scores for all stakeholder groups separately and asked to re-score. A final consensus meeting will be held with an expert panel and stakeholder representatives to review the guideline item list. Following the consensus meeting, a reporting guideline will be drafted and review and testing will be undertaken until the guideline is finalised. The final outcome will be the COS-STAR (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting) guideline for studies developing COS and a supporting explanatory document. DISCUSSION: To assess the credibility and usefulness of a COS, readers of a COS development report need complete, clear and transparent information on its methodology and proposed core set of outcomes. The COS-STAR guideline will potentially benefit all stakeholders in COS development: COS developers, COS users, e.g. trialists and systematic reviewers, journal editors, policy-makers and patient groups. BioMed Central 2015-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4546355/ /pubmed/26297658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0913-9 Text en © Kirkham et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kirkham, Jamie J.
Gorst, Sarah
Altman, Douglas G.
Blazeby, Jane
Clarke, Mike
Devane, Declan
Gargon, Elizabeth
Williamson, Paula R.
COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
title COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
title_full COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
title_fullStr COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
title_full_unstemmed COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
title_short COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
title_sort cos-star: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0913-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkhamjamiej cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT gorstsarah cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT altmandouglasg cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT blazebyjane cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT clarkemike cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT devanedeclan cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT gargonelizabeth cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT williamsonpaular cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol
AT cosstarareportingguidelineforstudiesdevelopingcoreoutcomesetsprotocol