Cargando…
Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention
Designing preventive programs relevant to vector-borne diseases such as Lyme disease (LD) can be complex given the need to include multiple issues and perspectives into prioritizing public health actions. A multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) model was previously used to rank interventions for LD pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26295344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135171 |
_version_ | 1782386954172628992 |
---|---|
author | Aenishaenslin, Cécile Gern, Lise Michel, Pascal Ravel, André Hongoh, Valérie Waaub, Jean-Philippe Milord, François Bélanger, Denise |
author_facet | Aenishaenslin, Cécile Gern, Lise Michel, Pascal Ravel, André Hongoh, Valérie Waaub, Jean-Philippe Milord, François Bélanger, Denise |
author_sort | Aenishaenslin, Cécile |
collection | PubMed |
description | Designing preventive programs relevant to vector-borne diseases such as Lyme disease (LD) can be complex given the need to include multiple issues and perspectives into prioritizing public health actions. A multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) model was previously used to rank interventions for LD prevention in Quebec, Canada, where the disease is emerging. The aim of the current study was to adapt and evaluate the decision model constructed in Quebec under a different epidemiological context, in Switzerland, where LD has been endemic for the last thirty years. The model adaptation was undertaken with a group of Swiss stakeholders using a participatory approach. The PROMETHEE method was used for multi-criteria analysis. Key elements and results of the MCDA model are described and contrasted with the Quebec model. All criteria and most interventions of the MCDA model developed for LD prevention in Quebec were directly transferable to the Swiss context. Four new decision criteria were added, and the list of proposed interventions was modified. Based on the overall group ranking, interventions targeting human populations were prioritized in the Swiss model, with the top ranked action being the implementation of a large communication campaign. The addition of criteria did not significantly alter the intervention rankings, but increased the capacity of the model to discriminate between highest and lowest ranked interventions. The current study suggests that beyond the specificity of the MCDA models developed for Quebec and Switzerland, their general structure captures the fundamental and common issues that characterize the complexity of vector-borne disease prevention. These results should encourage public health organizations to adapt, use and share MCDA models as an effective and functional approach to enable the integration of multiple perspectives and considerations in the prevention and control of complex public health issues such as Lyme disease or other vector-borne and zoonotic diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4546612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45466122015-09-01 Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention Aenishaenslin, Cécile Gern, Lise Michel, Pascal Ravel, André Hongoh, Valérie Waaub, Jean-Philippe Milord, François Bélanger, Denise PLoS One Research Article Designing preventive programs relevant to vector-borne diseases such as Lyme disease (LD) can be complex given the need to include multiple issues and perspectives into prioritizing public health actions. A multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) model was previously used to rank interventions for LD prevention in Quebec, Canada, where the disease is emerging. The aim of the current study was to adapt and evaluate the decision model constructed in Quebec under a different epidemiological context, in Switzerland, where LD has been endemic for the last thirty years. The model adaptation was undertaken with a group of Swiss stakeholders using a participatory approach. The PROMETHEE method was used for multi-criteria analysis. Key elements and results of the MCDA model are described and contrasted with the Quebec model. All criteria and most interventions of the MCDA model developed for LD prevention in Quebec were directly transferable to the Swiss context. Four new decision criteria were added, and the list of proposed interventions was modified. Based on the overall group ranking, interventions targeting human populations were prioritized in the Swiss model, with the top ranked action being the implementation of a large communication campaign. The addition of criteria did not significantly alter the intervention rankings, but increased the capacity of the model to discriminate between highest and lowest ranked interventions. The current study suggests that beyond the specificity of the MCDA models developed for Quebec and Switzerland, their general structure captures the fundamental and common issues that characterize the complexity of vector-borne disease prevention. These results should encourage public health organizations to adapt, use and share MCDA models as an effective and functional approach to enable the integration of multiple perspectives and considerations in the prevention and control of complex public health issues such as Lyme disease or other vector-borne and zoonotic diseases. Public Library of Science 2015-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4546612/ /pubmed/26295344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135171 Text en © 2015 Aenishaenslin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aenishaenslin, Cécile Gern, Lise Michel, Pascal Ravel, André Hongoh, Valérie Waaub, Jean-Philippe Milord, François Bélanger, Denise Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention |
title | Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention |
title_full | Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention |
title_fullStr | Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention |
title_short | Adaptation and Evaluation of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Lyme Disease Prevention |
title_sort | adaptation and evaluation of a multi-criteria decision analysis model for lyme disease prevention |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4546612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26295344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aenishaenslincecile adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention AT gernlise adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention AT michelpascal adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention AT ravelandre adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention AT hongohvalerie adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention AT waaubjeanphilippe adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention AT milordfrancois adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention AT belangerdenise adaptationandevaluationofamulticriteriadecisionanalysismodelforlymediseaseprevention |